Why Elohim if God is Absolutely One?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ben_Masada
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Who said that the NT is also Word of God coming from God, you, Paul, or the Church? Jesus was not because the NT appeared 50+ years after Jesus had been gone. That’s what I meant by getting trapped in your own web.
I don't understand why believing that the NT was inspired by God is getting trapped in a web. :confused:
 
I don’t understand why believing that the NT was inspired by God is getting trapped in a web. :confused:
Did Jesus ever mention the NT as God’s Word? No, he didn’t. Who decided it so? Paul or the Church? If Paul why would a former Jew who apostated from Judaism, write a few books and decide that they are Word of God? If the Church, why should a Jew aknowledge that a Church which has nothing to do with Judaism exhibit that power? Does this answer your question?
 
Who said that the NT is also Word of God coming from God, you, Paul, or the Church? Jesus was not because the NT appeared 50+ years after Jesus had been gone. That’s what I meant by getting trapped in your own web.
Yeah, and I guess all books of the Tanakh appeared Moses’ lifetime, so if one or more books were not indeed written by him personally, it would necessarily be invalited, right?
Come on, Ben. In started with oral teaching in both cases, not with written sacred text. The Qohol came first in the OT, and the Church came first in the NT also.
I haven’t got caught in MY web, if anything. YOU are making it a web… like tyrants who fear to be dethroned. What a pity!
 
Who said that the NT is also Word of God coming from God, you, Paul, or the Church?
Do you really care that much about God, Ben? What was the whole Tanakh written for, tell me? Why did God reveal Himself to Moses, and why when it happened did Moses prostrate to the ground? Why did Prophet Elijah cover his face when He felt the Presence of God was making Himself manifest? Abraham, Isaac and Jacob also prostrated themselves as soon as they recognized that the Presence of God was appearing to them. Why? Why did somebody or some people take the pain to write about them?
 
Who said that the NT is also Word of God coming from God (…)?
Who said to YOU that the NT is not the Word of God? And, have you read the whole of the NT? If you did, did you do it prayerfully, conversing with your “Adonai” (if God is indeed your Lord in your eyes, of course…)?
 
Is Elohim truly your God? Do you indeed try to love it with your whole heart, soul and strength, not merely try to formally do what God’s commandments ask you to do because it’s required and like it or not, you do it because you were told it’s your duty?
 
Did Jesus ever mention the NT as God’s Word? No, he didn’t. Who decided it so? Paul or the Church? If Paul why would a former Jew who apostated from Judaism, write a few books and decide that they are Word of God? If the Church, why should a Jew aknowledge that a Church which has nothing to do with Judaism exhibit that power? Does this answer your question?
I thought the Nazarenes, as you have called them, were Jews and a sect within Judaism at the time. Where do you see that Paul apostated from Judaism? He for one still considered himself to be a Jew. The “Church” (Assembly) was following a Jewish model, the Q-H-L (Qohol, maybe), which gave the name Qohelet, one of the books of Wisdom in the Tanakh (in the “Ketubim” part).
 
Did Jesus ever mention the NT as God’s Word? No, he didn’t. Who decided it so? Paul or the Church? If Paul why would a former Jew who apostated from Judaism, write a few books and decide that they are Word of God? If the Church, why should a Jew aknowledge that a Church which has nothing to do with Judaism exhibit that power? Does this answer your question?
It was the Church that decided so. Whether or not you agree with their decision is up to you.
 
How could three be one when the three are not the same? Luke says that Jesus appeared to the disciples for 40 days after his suffering on the cross, showing them in many convincing ways that he was alive in flesh and bone, eating and drinking just like any other man, until the day he was taken up to heaven.

When or where did he leave that body behind? Catholics have told me that Jesus as the second person of the Trinity in Heaven exhibits the wounds of the crucifixion. How can he exhibit the wounds of the crucifixion without a body? If the other two persons of the Trinity are without body, how could the three be one? So, there is no such a thing as unity in trinity. I am sorry to rain on your parade.

Ben: :)🙂
The trinity is a complicated subject. However you are incorrect in this statement. The trinity is unity in one.

They all have the same substance as each other, thus they are all fully God. Think of it like liquid water, frozen water, and gas water. All essentially the same in substance but different in character.

Or the sun also. The sun is the Father, the rays the Son, and the heat the Holy Spirit.
 
Yeah, and I guess all books of the Tanakh appeared Moses’ lifetime, so if one or more books were not indeed written by him personally, it would necessarily be invalited, right?
Come on, Ben. In started with oral teaching in both cases, not with written sacred text. The Qohol came first in the OT, and the Church came first in the NT also.
I haven’t got caught in MY web, if anything. YOU are making it a web… like tyrants who fear to be dethroned. What a pity!
**I think I have told you before, that I don’t care who or when the books of the Tanach were written, as long as they were written by Jews for Judaism, not against. I have noticed you have pulled that twice on me. It doesn’t work.

With the NT is different. You guys are using a religious Jew to write against Judaism. It doesn’t work that way either.**
 
Do you really care that much about God, Ben? What was the whole Tanakh written for, tell me? Why did God reveal Himself to Moses, and why when it happened did Moses prostrate to the ground? Why did Prophet Elijah cover his face when He felt the Presence of God was making Himself manifest? Abraham, Isaac and Jacob also prostrated themselves as soon as they recognized that the Presence of God was appearing to them. Why? Why did somebody or some people take the pain to write about them?
Why wouldn’t I? God has created the Jewish People for a special purpose, and that’s what the whole Tanach is about: God’s relation with Mankind through the Jewish People. And my care about God is free of any preconditions attached, as the reward of an afterlife, which is what moves Christians to care.
 
Is Elohim truly your God? Do you indeed try to love it with your whole heart, soul and strength, not merely try to formally do what God’s commandments ask you to do because it’s required and like it or not, you do it because you were told it’s your duty?
**At least I don’t do it with an eye in resurrection, which was Paul’s reason to serve. (I Cor. 15:32) Or under the condition of reward of an afterlife, which is the reason Christians use to serve. **
 
Who said to YOU that the NT is not the Word of God? And, have you read the whole of the NT? If you did, did you do it prayerfully, conversing with your “Adonai” (if God is indeed your Lord in your eyes, of course…)?
Yes, I have read the NT even more than several times. And believe me,
God has nothing to do with the NT. He couldn’t. Too much Antisemitism, Greek Mythology and contradictions.
 
I thought the Nazarenes, as you have called them, were Jews and a sect within Judaism at the time. Where do you see that Paul apostated from Judaism? He for one still considered himself to be a Jew. The “Church” (Assembly) was following a Jewish model, the Q-H-L (Qohol, maybe), which gave the name Qohelet, one of the books of Wisdom in the Tanakh (in the “Ketubim” part).
This that Paul still considered himself to be a Jew is not new. At the time of Elijah there were many Jews who had apostated from Judaism to worship Baal and still considered themselves Jewish. They were the “Jews-for-Baal.” Just like we have today “Jews-for-Jesus.” Paul must have been one of these. Elijah got so upset at them that ended up by slitting the throats of 450 of their prophets.
 
The trinity is a complicated subject. However you are incorrect in this statement. The trinity is unity in one.

They all have the same substance as each other, thus they are all fully God. Think of it like liquid water, frozen water, and gas water. All essentially the same in substance but different in character.

Or the sun also. The sun is the Father, the rays the Son, and the heat the Holy Spirit.
**Much less complicated therefore is to accept the truth that God is absolutely One and Incorporeal at that. Jesus himself said that God is Spirit, and spirit is incorporeal. (John 4:24) Then, there is no logic that three could ever be one.

They don’t all have the same substance because one is in body. And there is no such a thing as “they” in talking about God. God is One and the only Lord. That’s also from Jesus himself in Mark 12:29. As you can see, you must either be with the Church or with Jesus, because the doctrine of the Trinity is a contradiction to Jesus’ own words. **
 
**Much less complicated therefore is to accept the truth that God is absolutely One and Incorporeal at that. Jesus himself said that God is Spirit, and spirit is incorporeal. (John 4:24) Then, there is no logic that three could ever be one.

They don’t all have the same substance because one is in body. And there is no such a thing as “they” in talking about God. God is One and the only Lord. That’s also from Jesus himself in Mark 12:29. As you can see, you must either be with the Church or with Jesus, because the doctrine of the Trinity is a contradiction to Jesus’ own words. **
“Before Abraham, I AM”

Also before his execution the Sanhedrin ask him if he is the Son of God. And He answers in the positive. Never once did he deny it.

Also Peter answered, when Jesus asked “So who do you say that I am”, and Peter answered “Your are the Christ, the Son of the living God”. Then Jesus answered in the affirmative and declared Peter to be the holder of the Keys and the Rock of the Church.

When I was saying “they” I had meant the character of each in the Trinity. Like when Jacob wrestled with the angel of God. Another ‘character’ of him. Or the burning bush. Or the angel in the fiery pit with Daniel. Genesis talks about God in heaven and God on earth, Genesis 19:23 ,Zechariah 3:1-2 (YHWH calling upon YHWH: “And the LORD said unto Satan, The LORD rebuke thee, O Satan”

“And I will pour out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and supplication. They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child, and grieve bitterly for him as one grieves for a firstborn son. – Zechariah 12:10

*"I kept looking in the night visions, And behold, with the clouds of heaven One like a Son of Man was coming, And He came up to the Ancient of Days And was presented before Him. "And to Him was given dominion, Glory and a kingdom, That all the peoples, nations, and men of every language Might serve Him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion Which will not pass away; And His kingdom is one Which will not be destroyed. (Daniel 7:13-14) *

We must also remember that the Prophet Daniel predicted the messiah would come before the destruction of the temple. Meaning he had to have come before A.D. 70.
 
“Before Abraham, I AM”

Jesus was Jewish, and that’s not Jewish; therefore, not true.

Also before his execution the Sanhedrin ask him if he is the Son of God. And He answers in the positive. Never once did he deny it.

**Are you sure he answered in the positive and did not deny it? You are not focused when reading your NT. His answer was, “You said so.” That’s not positive. It could even be negative. Besides, as he continued, he said, “And you will see the son of man coming…” What did he say? Did he continue the thought of the High Priest? No, he did not. He changed his question in the answer. If the question was son of God, he fixed the answer with son of man. That’s quite something else, which only faith prevents one from seeing the difference. **

Also Peter answered, when Jesus asked “So who do you say that I am”, and Peter answered “Your are the Christ, the Son of the living God”. Then Jesus answered in the affirmative and declared Peter to be the holder of the Keys and the Rock of the Church.

Peter could have never said that for two reasons: First, because the expression started with Paul 30 years later. And second, Peter was a member of the Sect of the Nazarenes headquartered in Jerusalem and coexisting peacefully with mainstream Judaism. (Acts 9:31) When Paul showed up in Jerusalem with that exact message, he got almost killed for preaching apostasy. It’s only obvious that the Apostles did not know about such a thing.

When I was saying “they” I had meant the character of each in the Trinity. Like when Jacob wrestled with the angel of God. Another ‘character’ of him. Or the burning bush. Or the angel in the fiery pit with Daniel. Genesis talks about God in heaven and God on earth, Genesis 19:23 ,Zechariah 3:1-2 (YHWH calling upon YHWH: “And the LORD said unto Satan, The LORD rebuke thee, O Satan”

**That’s all metaphorical. **

“And I will pour out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and supplication. They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child, and grieve bitterly for him as one grieves for a firstborn son. – Zechariah 12:10

That’s a reference to the Jews returning from Babylon. In Jerusalem they would ponder on the cause of their happy chance to start their lives again in Jerusalem, that it was all due to the sacrifice of Israel, who had been removed so that Judah would remain forever. So, the Jews would, in their memory, look at him (Israel) whom they had pierced with their sins, and mourn for him as one mourn for his firsborn.

*"I kept looking in the night visions, And behold, with the clouds of heaven One like a Son of Man was coming, And He came up to the Ancient of Days And was presented before Him. "And to Him was given dominion, Glory and a kingdom, That all the peoples, nations, and men of every language Might serve Him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion Which will not pass away; And His kingdom is one Which will not be destroyed. (Daniel 7:13-14) *

**That was a prophetical vision to be fulfilled in Judah eventually. **

We must also remember that the Prophet Daniel predicted the messiah would come before the destruction of the temple. Meaning he had to have come before A.D. 70.

That prophecy of Daniel 9:24-27 is a Jewish prophecy that must be interpreted Jewishly and not by using the tools of another religion, which are prone to fail from the onset. I have posted a thread with the Jewish interpretation of that prophecy. Mind you that it does not have anything to do with Jesus.
 
Did Jesus ever mention the NT as God’s Word? No, he didn’t.
We know about Jesus and what he taught – the gospel of God – from the written gospels.
The gospel of God is,of course,God’s Word. Jesus is both the teacher of God’s Word and he is himself God’s Word.
Who decided it so? Paul or the Church?
The Church. And Paul belonged to the Church.
If Paul why would a former Jew who apostated from Judaism, write a few books and decide that they are Word of God?
Paul had been spoken to by Christ and had been taken up into heaven in a vision.
If the Church, why should a Jew aknowledge that a Church which has nothing to do with Judaism exhibit that power? Does this answer your question?
The Church has a lot to do with the Jewish religion.
 
Jesus was Jewish, and that’s not Jewish; therefore, not true.
What isn’t Jewish? THe sentence “Before Abraham, I AM”? Why did the Jews get so angry at him and wanted to stone him after he said that?

Jesus spoke Aramaic, not Hebrew.
**Are you sure he answered in the positive and did not deny it? You are not focused when reading your NT. His answer was, “You said so.” That’s not positive. It could even be negative. Besides, as he continued, he said, “And you will see the son of man coming…” What did he say? Did he continue the thought of the High Priest? No, he did not. He changed his question in the answer. If the question was son of God, he fixed the answer with son of man. That’s quite something else, which only faith prevents one from seeing the difference. **
The grammar structure that is being used shows he probably answered in the positive. Otherwise he would have no need to claim he would be in the clouds of heaven descending upon them, which is a God-like action and type of vision.
Peter could have never said that for two reasons: First, because the expression started with Paul 30 years later. And second, Peter was a member of the Sect of the Nazarenes headquartered in Jerusalem and coexisting peacefully with mainstream Judaism. (Acts 9:31) When Paul showed up in Jerusalem with that exact message, he got almost killed for preaching apostasy. It’s only obvious that the Apostles did not know about such a thing.
You sure about that? Peter went though alot of trouble in the book of Acts. Prison and beatings. The Pharisees confronted him in the book of Acts a few times. Acts 9:31 only talks about the Church ebing during a peaceful stage with less persecution. That dosen’t mean the apostles were scratch free though.
**That’s all metaphorical. **
It might be. But either way the bible is showing different forms of the essence of God. Whether he be on top of Mount Sinai, the clouds surrounding the Ark, the wrestling angel and the angel in the pit with Daniel, the finger and hand that Daniel saw writing on the wall about the kings destruction, etc
**That was a prophetical vision to be fulfilled in Judah eventually. **
So who is this Son of Man and Ancient of Days? WHo is this person who is given dominion, glory and an everlasting kingdom??
That prophecy of Daniel 9:24-27 is a Jewish prophecy that must be interpreted Jewishly and not by using the tools of another religion, which are prone to fail from the onset. I have posted a thread with the Jewish interpretation of that prophecy. Mind you that it does not have anything to do with Jesus.
Yes, but Daniel does say, that before the Temple is destroyed the Messiah will come. Its quite explicit.

So you are to know and discern that from the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah the Prince there will be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks; it will be built again, with plaza and moat, even in times of distress. Then after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah will be cut off and have nothing, and the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary - Daniel 9:25-26
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top