You can choose goodness, truth and love without believing the God of Abraham is real.
I know you’ll disagree.
Sure, you can choose some degree of goodness, truth and love, but will that be the complete truth, fullness of love and absolute goodness?
How would you know if you make yourself the final arbiter of all three?
At the same time, how would you know anything at all about goodness, truth or love without having some capacity to recognize them? Where does that capacity derive? Is it merely made up by you or do goodness, truth and love exist objectively? If objectively, then from what source? Fullness of truth, goodness and love – AKA, the Subsistent Act of Being Itself? the Actus Purus or Ipsum Esse Subsistens of Aquinas? I AM WHO AM? The God of Abraham?
Whether or not I believe the God of Abraham is real is less important than what it is I believe the God of Abraham to be.
There are, by the way, some very interesting connections between the place where Abraham was compelled to sacrifice his only begotten son, Isaac, and where Jesus the only begotten Son of the Father was, in fact, sacrificed. They are one and the same place – Mt. Moriah, the Site of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Were you aware of that?
Were you also aware that when Isaac asked his father Abraham about the sacrificial altar they had prepared, Abraham answered that God himself would provide the lamb? And yet, it was a ram – and NOT a lamb – that appeared in the thicket and which they sacrificed, leaving open to fulfillment Abraham’s wards that God himself would provide the lamb.
Did you also know that the lambs prepared for sacrifice at the Temple in Jerusalem at Passover were splayed on tiny crosses of wood, very like the manner in which Jesus, the lamb of God, was prepared for sacrifice?
Dismissible coincidences? Perhaps.
But how many of these dismissible coincidences add up to being no longer dismissible?
Is there a point at which they can no longer be dismissed?