Mr. inJESUS,
Before attacking Prophet Muhammed (pbuh),
you should first attack the translators of your own Catholc Bible-
The New American Bible, who **denied to translate the Greek word “PIAS” as Son, with capital “S”. They translated it as “servant” with small “s”. **
Mr. inJESUS,
I dare you call those some 50 Biblical scholars (who were appointed by your Holy Papacy to prepare a fresh English translation) denied the “Son-ship” of Jesus (atleast in the case of )Act 3:26 while translating it.
Now take a look what your old Douay Rheims Bible say:
Acts 3:26 - From Catholic’s** Douay Rheims Bible**
To you first God, raising up his Son, hath sent him to bless you; that every one may convert himself from his wickedness.
[
Douay-Rheims Bible, Acts of Apostles Chapter 3]](
Douay-Rheims Bible, Acts of Apostles Chapter 3])
then compare it with:
Acts 3:26 - From Catholic’s** The New American Bible**
**…For you first, God raised up his servant ** and sent him to bless you by turning each of you from your evil ways."
usccb.org/nab/bible/acts/acts3.htm
So the Greek word “
PIAS” of the so-called “original” Manuscript of New Testament is translated by the Catholic Bible scholars as: servant in their recent version of the Bible unlike their own previous Bible -
Douay Rheims. By the way Greek was not the native language of Jesus nor his Jewish disciples.
I wonder why Catholic learned Bible translators felt necessary to
translate "PIAS" as servant with small “s” by rejecting their OWN previous stance, i.e. Son with capital “S”?
NOW, Did Muslims asked those Catholic Bible scholars to change the meaning of PIAS, from SON to servant?
Again, who told these learned Catholic scholars and your “infallible” Papacy to deny the
Son-ship of Jesus atleast in the Act 3:26 ???
Mr. inJESUS, from your same logic, I dare you call **your own learned Catholic scholars ** and
your “infallible” Papacy,
deniers of the
Son-ship of Jesus.
.