V
ValiantDomain
Guest
Thanks again to all. I plan on talking to my priest about my dilemma soon.
I will pray for you. Don’t give up, there is something good waiting for you at the end of this suffering. Btw, how about praying novena to St. Jude since tomorrow is his feast day.I’ve been thinking a lot about this issue between last night and today and am starting to feel frustrated again…despite how much I try trusting in God.
Sometimes I want to give up and just become Episcopalian, but when I love the Church so much, I know I never could allow myself to do such. This is hard.
Pray for me.

Oh come on. Here we have a guy who has done his homework and is committed to joining the Church, and you’re giving him grief about his choice of words?<<
My story is one of continually searching for the one faith and religion which gives me a sense of comfort, sustenance, etc. and one which fits my own faith and beliefs like a glove. >>
It’s interesting how TRUTH doesn’t fit into your spiritual search at all, merely your own preferences.
In other words, you want your tummy patted and your ears tickled.
1 Timotny 2:3-4
3For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
4And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
Sometimes it's a matter of various doctrines, such as transubstantiation or the Marian emphasis. There is simply too much that they can't believe. (Actually, a Barna poll indicates that Catholics are quite a bit more skeptical of their theology than most Protestants are of theirs. Check the net for details.)
Sometimes it's a bad experience with a priest or with a Catholic school.
Sometimes it's resentment over what they see as gender discrimination against women.
Sometimes Catholics resent the 'one, true church' claim and prefer a church that is more ecumenical, less exclusive in its claims.
Sometimes Catholics visit one of those 'rocking' churches with a friend or relative, and they find it much more exciting than what they begin to view as a typical pre-packaged mass that has little spontaneity.
Sometimes Catholic congregations are just too big and some people prefer a smaller intimate church family.
As you can see, I'm struggling with the issue myself. I know so many who have fallen away from Catholicism, most of them to nothingness - possibly mass on Christmas and Easter - but many to one or another style of Protestantism.
I guess I honestly don't believe that God cares a hoot about the label. God looks at the heart. Jesus didn't mention any particular denomination, but summed everything up this way: love God and one another. That strikes me as the keystone and central 'doctrine' of Christianity.
I agree. The pathetic thing is that this kind of thing seems to happen a lot on these forums… I mean, wahtever happened to “love your neibhbor as yourself.”Oh come on. Here we have a guy who has done his homework and is committed to joining the Church, and you’re giving him grief about his choice of words?
Only one problem: What is love?Code:I guess I honestly don't believe that God cares a hoot about the label. God looks at the heart. Jesus didn't mention any particular denomination, but summed everything up this way: love God and one another. .
(2) Now, the notion that the Catholic Church is the only church in which Christ is physically present depends upon acceptance of transubstantiation - the dogma that through the priest bread and wine are transformed into the literal body and body of Christ during mass. I have trouble with that as do millions of modern Catholics. It smacks of the primitive notion that God is only satisfied with a blood (human) sacrifice. Besides, isn't Christ alive everywhere and at all times? Or, is that heresy?Roy, this thread is drifting into a discussion more suitable for the “Apologetics” or “Non-Catholic Religions” section, but to address briefly the above: It is not true to say that only Catholics have the understanding of Peter’s person as the rock. This belief is shared by many non-Catholic scholars scholars who, while they would doubtless argue to varying degrees against Peter’s role continuining in the governance of the Church through those who occupied his chair, do recognize his role as rock:(1) When Christ said he was building his church upon a rock, recall that Peter had just confessed him as Lord. Was Christ saying that he was building his church on Peter as a person or on the testimony Peter had just given? Not an easy question to answer with any certainty unless you consider the church your one and only authority. I prefer to ponder the scrptures myself. Is that a sin? . . .
No.I prefer to ponder the scrptures myself. Is that a sin?
Perhaps the articles below will help clarify for you the Church’s teaching - a teaching, btw, shared by all true Apostolic Churches, although their terminologies will be different than the Latin-rite “transubstantiation”.(2) Now, the notion that the Catholic Church is the only church in which Christ is physically present depends upon acceptance of transubstantiation - the dogma that through the priest bread and wine are transformed into the literal body and body of Christ during mass. I have trouble with that as do millions of modern Catholics. It smacks of the primitive notion that God is only satisfied with a blood (human) sacrifice. Besides, isn’t Christ alive everywhere and at all times? Or, is that heresy?