M
Mickey
Guest
It is posts such as this that motivate people to run to the nearest Catholic or Orthodox Church! :yup:I do not follow error i follow the Lord and his word.
It is posts such as this that motivate people to run to the nearest Catholic or Orthodox Church! :yup:I do not follow error i follow the Lord and his word.
Stick to what is clear from your search: Protestantism is an “error” - and make a move either way - to move forward in obedience to God. It does not mean that you have made the perfect move, only that you have made a faithful move away from the “errors” you previously embraced.Greetings to you all.
I came to this board in the summer of 2005, as part of my desire to satisfy my curiosity about Catholicism, as well as get the Catholic answer to some of my questions. Over the next few months, I battled in my mind and soul over the apparent conclusion I had reached. I would have to become Catholic. This horrified me for a time, but eventually I looked forward to it with joy.
However, then I discovered Eastern Orthodoxy, heard new, more authoritative, objections to Catholicism, and found that my old certainty was significantly lessened. I moved away from my old Evangelical Protestant way of thinking–the combined Catholic-Orthodox witness and history was enough to show me the errors of Protestantism–but I found that I could not choose between Catholicism and Orthodoxy. …
You are equivocating with irrelevencies. Why should you entertain thoughts about Catholics who attend church grudgingly? That is a cop out. What you need to contemplate is simply this: from your search (which revealed errors of Protestantism) would God be more pleased with you worshipping in either the Catholic (or Orthodox) Church or would it be better to do nothing and remain where you are? You started out insinuating that the result of your searching to date showed that either move (Catholic or Orthodox) was an improvement, yet now you seem to be choosing to do nothing rather than embracing either choice? This is a classic example of the “perfect being the enemy of the good” where your zeal for the “perfect” choice leads to the exclusion of 2 good choices, which leads you to actually choose the lessor choice: remaining where you are.
- I am not remotely convinced that the Catholic who attends church grudgingly and goes through the motions is more pleasing to God than the Protestant who truly loves God and desires to do His will.
The funny thing is, that is exactly what you HAVE chosen. You have chosen to remain in the “error” of a Protestant church despite knowing that you don’t agree with it!And, that being said, I cannot join the Church unless I am convinced of all its teachings.
Thanks! God bless!![]()
In the absence of clear light otherwise, we have a sacred duty to remain where God has placed us. Otherwise we are engaging in an arrogant, individualistic search for truth that will not suit us to be faithful adherents of any orthodox Christian church.The funny thing is, that is exactly what you HAVE chosen. You have chosen to remain in the “error” of a Protestant church despite knowing that you don’t agree with it!
Good, well written points, thanks.In the absence of clear light otherwise, we have a sacred duty to remain where God has placed us. Otherwise we are engaging in an arrogant, individualistic search for truth that will not suit us to be faithful adherents of any orthodox Christian church.
Your assumption that staying where we are is just as much a “choice” as moving is an illogical assumption. It is on a par (for illogic, not for immorality of course) with Peter Singer’s belief that failing to attend to the needs of some person halfway across the world is just as bad as actively harming someone we actually meet.
In Christ,
Edwin
Okay. And as soon as I believe I know which way God is telling me forward is, I will step in that direction.Stick to what is clear from your search: Protestantism is an “error” - and make a move either way - to move forward in obedience to God. It does not mean that you have made the perfect move, only that you have made a faithful move away from the “errors” you previously embraced.
Sigh…I should point out that I’m not remaining anywhere. I have been actively studying Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, attending Mass and Divine Liturgy in their churches, and trying to discern the will of God. I have already left the harbor of Protestantism, and I’m at sea trying to find the harbor of my true home.What you need to contemplate is simply this: from your search (which revealed errors of Protestantism) would God be more pleased with you worshipping in either the Catholic (or Orthodox) Church or would it be better to do nothing and remain where you are? You started out insinuating that the result of your searching to date showed that either move (Catholic or Orthodox) was an improvement, yet now you seem to be choosing to do nothing rather than embracing either choice? This is a classic example of the “perfect being the enemy of the good” where your zeal for the “perfect” choice leads to the exclusion of 2 good choices, which leads you to actually choose the lessor choice: remaining where you are.
And yet a decision has to be made. I can’t make a move until I know which direction the move should be. If I’m standing at a crossroads, I can’t just step forward. I have to choose a path.Let me ask you a question that is more relevent to your situation: Is God more pleased with you remaining where you are (now that you know it is not where you belong) or would He be more pleased with a move - in faith - away from where you are despite a few remaining reservations?
Sigh…again…I have not remained in any Protestant church, nor am I choosing to be Protestant. The fact that I am trying to choose between Catholicism and Orthodoxy does not mean I am still a Protestant by default. I am searching for the true Church, and the fact that I have not found it yet does not mean I have given up the search. Nor does the fact that I have not yet found the truth mean that I am deliberately choosing falsehood.The funny thing is, that is exactly what you HAVE chosen. You have chosen to remain in the “error” of a Protestant church despite knowing that you don’t agree with it!
Hi Edwin. I misunderstood where Iambic Pen was - I thought he was still actively participating in the area Christianity (Protestant) which the “clear light” of reason had revealed was no longer acceptable for him. That is why I made the comments I did. I havent a clue what you mean by “where God has placed us”, BTW - it sounds like a thought for someone who simply needs to rest at night.In the absence of clear light otherwise, we have a sacred duty to remain where God has placed us. Otherwise we are engaging in an arrogant, individualistic search for truth that will not suit us to be faithful adherents of any orthodox Christian church.
I disagree with your analogy.Your assumption that staying where we are is just as much a “choice” as moving is an illogical assumption. It is on a par (for illogic, not for immorality of course) with Peter Singer’s belief that failing to attend to the needs of some person halfway across the world is just as bad as actively harming someone we actually meet.
In Christ,
Edwin
I don’t disagree with you Edwin, but the light has gotten a LOT clearer for me in the past few months. In fact I would say it has become blinding! I would caution you though, against believing that because you are in a “good” (i.e.orthodox?) Episcopal parish you will never have to deal with the current controversies. I promise you, eventually you will.In the absence of clear light otherwise, we have a sacred duty to remain where God has placed us
Oh, I’m under no such illusion. It’s not that I don’t *yet *have to deal with them but rather that for the moment I no longer have to deal with them as immediately. The parish in NC where I was confirmed has now split, with the rector and many/most of the people joining one of the Continuing Churches. My parish in NJ (which I never officially joined because I was too uncertain about remaining Episcopalians) was much more liberal and the rector they called about a year before I moved was by my standards very liberal (though surprisingly orthodox in her basic preaching–perhaps this was just because she used deceptively orthodox language, but I got to know her well enough that I’m quite confident this was not the case). So the fact that I’m now (since the end of August) in a fairly conservative parish in a fairly conservative diocese is actually a new factor to be considered!I don’t disagree with you Edwin, but the light has gotten a LOT clearer for me in the past few months. In fact I would say it has become blinding! I would caution you though, against believing that because you are in a “good” (i.e.orthodox?) Episcopal parish you will never have to deal with the current controversies. I promise you, eventually you will.
Hi,
You echo many of my concerns. I also have been thinking that I would like to join the Roman Catholic Church (after spending a long weekend at an abbey) and experiencing Mass firsthand.
However, then I ran into obstacles:
Why can only Catholics participate in true communion when Jesus clearly says that without communion we do not belong to Him?
How can Mary be co-redemptrix when our God is a jealous God? and will not share glory with any other? How can Mary be without sin when the scripture clearly teaches that “no not one is without sin” except Jesus Christ?
And then, there are the Old Catholic and Eastern Orthodoxy claiming to be the part of the one true church and adding confusion.
I always believed that the one true church is the body of believers - all of us together under one Head, our Lord and Savior via the Holy Spirit.
I think Jesus is crying in Heaven looking down at us. I believe that those persons who recognize the Real Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist have the obligation to take the Eucharist when offered.
The Mass is not just for Roman Catholics; it is for all true Christians. It is just unfortunate that so few Protestants ever attend a Mass and when they do, feel unaccepted and inadequate.
Hey there,I agree with 7 and I’ve been Catholic all my life. The teaching used to be that all non-Catholics were toast. I couldn’t really believe that my Baptist Bible loving friends were eternally doomed just because they went to a church 2 blocks away.
Here are some articles which may answer your questions:Hey there,
This is my issue as a non-Catholic (at this point): how can those non-Catholic Baptists be one with Christ if they are denied true Communion with the Lord? I think this is where the Roman Catholic Church has hit a wall - if Baptists who believe, really believe and follow the Lord, are “saved” then they also have an obligation and a right to participate in the Eucharist.
![]()
Hi Janet,Remember, you can receive the Holy Eucharist if you truly desire it. You must, though, become a Catholic first. Be patient though since all good things are worth the wait.
Sorry, but you obey the Lord when you obey His Church. “He who hears you hears me.”Hi Janet,
You know, I have read at least one of these articles and I understand the argument; I just happen to not agree with it.
I take the Holy Eucharist at an abbey with monks and priests at least once a week, and refrain from taking “communion” at my non-denominational church because this church does not recognize the Body and Blood of Christ in the Eucharist.
I am declaring my unity with the entire Body of Christ (i.e. the Church) each time I take the Holy Eucharist.
This is my obligation: to obey the Lord.
Thanks for your kind thoughts, but I can not wait for the good things that are mine already.
They also have the obligation and the right to become Catholics, but what are the chances of that ever happening?… if Baptists who believe, really believe and follow the Lord, are “saved” then they also have an obligation and a right to participate in the Eucharist.
QUOTE]
- I am not convinced of the Catholic understanding of original sin, and its attendant teachings. Namely, that unbaptized infants may possibly be damned, or go to some alternate “in-between” state. The more positive phrasing of the new Catechism does not help much, as new teachings cannot contradict old teachings.
Hmmm… I remember a few moths ago Pope Benidict XVI once adressed the same thing, yet he announced that this belief is only a theological idea from Saint Augustine and have dennounced it from doctrine and has never been in doctrne. However, Im not really sure about this, but ill let you know where I have found this info…it’s just that I need to find it.![]()