D
divinefaith
Guest
I have to admit the pill’s side effects can sometimes be irritating. I use it for hormonal reasons and I’ve developed skin pigmentation. Not everyone might experience that side effect though
WHY, Because God became man to save us, that is to set us free from the slavery of sin. God did not become man to open the gates of heaven. No where does the Church teach that the reason God became man was to make eternal salvation possible, that is, to open the gates of heaven.
Greetings Maryjk,Do you really think that people make that distinction? Or is it more that they don’t understand?
I know that when I used ABC, I had no idea that it was against the teaches of the Catholic Church. I wasn’t going against anything, as far as I knew.![]()
Greetings Dcharles,Statistical Information from “The Practice of Natural Family Planning Versus the Use of Artificial Birth Control: Family, Sexual and Moral Issues” by Mercedes Arzu Wilson, in Catholic Social Science Review, Vol VII, Nov. 2002
Couples that are married by a justice of peace – 50% of marriages end in divorce.
Couples married by the Church – 33% of marriages end in divorce.
Couples married by the Church and attend Church together – 2% end in divorce.
Couples using NFP – 2-5% end in divorce.
Couples married by the Church, pray together, and use NFP - .001 – 1% end in divorce.
These stats were gathered from the original study below
familiadelasamericas.org/inc/data/divorce_study_eng_wilson.pdf
You do know that there is a difference between correlation and causation, right? That is, the same thing that allows a couple to use NFP (say, attentiveness to one’s body, communication skills and a mutual willingness to put future good ahead of present desire) might also stave off divorce. That couple might elect not to use NFP (maybe they use nothing or they might use the hormones found in birth control pills for medical reasons not having to do with willful contraception), and have the same result.No one has ever shown a single study where the divorce rate of people who use NFP was above 4%. Never.
If Catholics who use NFP are also devout and make use of God’s grace through prayer and the sacraments, their divorce rate is less than 1% and even zero in some studies I have read.
Thus why in the world would Catholics want to use artificial birth control, especially dangerous birth control pills, with their increase in cancer rates, and which cause the deaths of the innocent unborn children, which decrease the sex drives of the women who take them, thus making the husbands miserable, and their marriages miserable, which turn peoples hearts away from God, and away from the Church, which alone has God’s teachings handed down infallibly. These teachings of God, which Jesus handed down and taught entirely to His Church are all for our good and for our happiness.
Why would anyone want to reject the teachings of God, who is all good and who suffered and died so that we can be happy in this life, and instead listen to the ideas of the abortion company, Planned Parenthood, and its founder Margaret Sanger who thought children were a burden because they prevented her from committing adultery and why would they listen to the greedy birth control companies who will promote any drug, no matter how dangerous it is to adults and their unborn babies, as long as they can make money.
Why don’t they believe Jesus when He said to listen to His Church?
Why do they want to be unhappy and slaves to the misery of sin?
Using birth control pills is pure stupidity.
When I read through this “study”, nowhere did I find it saying that this began 20 years ago and that within those 20 years the percentage of couples who used NFP at the beginning who were still using it 5 or 10 or 15 or 20 years later were married, divorced or anything else. From what I could gather, this “study” got in touch with NFP teachers and had them choose the students they would have questioned. (this in itself makes this “study” suspect - as there was no randomness about the testing - the people asked were chosen by their teachers). It seems (from what I read this study to say) - that a certain number of people who were using NFP were asked by their NFP instructors to be studied - their average marriage of these particular NFP users was a little over 15 years - no where did it begin with a group and then study this group 5, 10 or 15 years later. Yes, it gave information about their life ( how many partners they’d had, if they had ever used ABC, etc)- I don’t see that it proved anything but that they were able to find a number of NFP users who were still married - it basically went backwards - first finding the couples who had been chosen to respond and had gone to NFP training as little as 3 years ago and upwards of 15 years ago. Then they asked this chosen group a number of moral questions such as: “how many partners have you had?” and “have you had any abortions?”…Statistical Information from “The Practice of Natural Family Planning Versus the Use of Artificial Birth Control: Family, Sexual and Moral Issues” by Mercedes Arzu Wilson, in Catholic Social Science Review, Vol VII, Nov. 2002
Couples that are married by a justice of peace – 50% of marriages end in divorce.
Couples married by the Church – 33% of marriages end in divorce.
Couples married by the Church and attend Church together – 2% end in divorce.
Couples using NFP – 2-5% end in divorce.
Couples married by the Church, pray together, and use NFP - .001 – 1% end in divorce.
These stats were gathered from the original study below
familiadelasamericas.org/inc/data/divorce_study_eng_wilson.pdf
Why don’t you write the author, she has a website and ask her those questions. I am sure she can give you more information. I am sure that many people have attacked these studies before, after all, the birth control pill companies have a lot to lose, and so I am sure they have searched for errors. They could lose billions if the truth was promoted. But, we know from experience that those who oppose the Catholic Church are not exactly obsessed with the truth.When I read through this “study”, nowhere did I find it saying that this began 20 years ago and that within those 20 years the percentage of couples who used NFP at the beginning who were still using it 5 or 10 or 15 or 20 years later were married, divorced or anything else. From what I could gather, this “study” got in touch with NFP teachers and had them choose the students they would have questioned. (this in itself makes this “study” suspect - as there was no randomness about the testing - the people asked were chosen by their teachers). It seems (from what I read this study to say) - that a certain number of people who were using NFP were asked by their NFP instructors to be studied - their average marriage of these particular NFP users was a little over 15 years - no where did it begin with a group and then study this group 5, 10 or 15 years later. Yes, it gave information about their life ( how many partners they’d had, if they had ever used ABC, etc)- I don’t see that it proved anything but that they were able to find a number of NFP users who were still married - it basically went backwards - first finding the couples who had been chosen to respond and had gone to NFP training as little as 3 years ago and upwards of 15 years ago. Then they asked this chosen group a number of moral questions such as: “how many partners have you had?” and “have you had any abortions?”…
Saying that this study in anyway PROVED that the marriages that used NFP have a less than 1% chance of divorce is at best MISLEADING.
This work sites a number of articles - one takes the Creighton method into question - and then it claims a 99.5 and 96.8 % “effective rate” - but only in the foot notes does it mention that by the 18th month there is a combines “discontinuation rate” of almost 1/4 of the participants (not they don’t say WHY they discontinued use).
It just looked like this work was being used to try to prove that NFP only based marriages have a less than 1% chance of divorce and with regards to this study, I don’t believe that this was in any way proven. I have no doubt that many if not most NFP marriages have a fairly low rate of divorce and I’m really happy for those people that have success with the method.
God Bless
Rye
p.s. This work sites a number of articles - one takes the Creighton method into question - and then it claims a 99.5 and 96.8 % “effective rate” - but only in the foot notes does it mention that by the 18th month there is a combined"discontinuation rate" of almost 1/4 of the participants (they don’t say WHY they discontinued use). This is a study I’ve seen sighted multiple times at pro life/Catholic sites - but making any claims about this information being accurate and touting that very high “success” rate in my opinion at best is misleading - at worst dishonest
I looked, but could not find one in any other format. I suppose because it has colored charts and graphs which are hard to put in other formats.Greetings Dcharles,
I was wondering if this document or study is available in another format besides pdf. If you know where I could find it, I would appreciate it if you could direct me to it.
God Bless.
Anathama Sit
I have this summary of the study in the regular HTML format on the internet at this pre-cana site:Greetings Dcharles,
I was wondering if this document or study is available in another format besides pdf. If you know where I could find it, I would appreciate it if you could direct me to it.
God Bless.
Anathama Sit
Yeah I don’t understand how the OP can;t see how suspect this study looks when you look at it this way. I mean it seems like they basically cherry picked the data to get the results they wanted. But yeah this in no way proves or is even strong evidence that NFP alone keeps marriages together. There usually other factors and one brought up a lot in this thread is that the devout NFP users are more likely though certainly not guarenteed to be the type that believe in no divorce ever. Really though if a couple was having marriage problems and were on the pill or some other form of contraception. I think the last thing I would recommend is NFP! I think with all the stress and strain NFP can and often does put on a marriage often times you really need a strong healthy marriage in the first place in order to endure. Of course like has been pointed out before some people will stay married no matter how miserable they are and some of those people are using NFP. But those people probably aren;t staying together because of NFP they are staying together because they believe in no divorce ever!When I read through this “study”, nowhere did I find it saying that this began 20 years ago and that within those 20 years the percentage of couples who used NFP at the beginning who were still using it 5 or 10 or 15 or 20 years later were married, divorced or anything else. From what I could gather, this “study” got in touch with NFP teachers and had them choose the students they would have questioned. (this in itself makes this “study” suspect - as there was no randomness about the testing - the people asked were chosen by their teachers). It seems (from what I read this study to say) - that a certain number of people who were using NFP were asked by their NFP instructors to be studied - their average marriage of these particular NFP users was a little over 15 years - no where did it begin with a group and then study this group 5, 10 or 15 years later. Yes, it gave information about their life ( how many partners they’d had, if they had ever used ABC, etc)- I don’t see that it proved anything but that they were able to find a number of NFP users who were still married - it basically went backwards - first finding the couples who had been chosen to respond and had gone to NFP training as little as 3 years ago and upwards of 15 years ago. Then they asked this chosen group a number of moral questions such as: “how many partners have you had?” and “have you had any abortions?”…
Saying that this study in anyway PROVED that the marriages that used NFP have a less than 1% chance of divorce is at best MISLEADING.
This work sites a number of articles - one takes the Creighton method into question - and then it claims a 99.5 and 96.8 % “effective rate” - but only in the foot notes does it mention that by the 18th month there is a combines “discontinuation rate” of almost 1/4 of the participants (not they don’t say WHY they discontinued use).
It just looked like this work was being used to try to prove that NFP only based marriages have a less than 1% chance of divorce and with regards to this study, I don’t believe that this was in any way proven. I have no doubt that many if not most NFP marriages have a fairly low rate of divorce and I’m really happy for those people that have success with the method.
God Bless
Rye
p.s. This work sites a number of articles - one takes the Creighton method into question - and then it claims a 99.5 and 96.8 % “effective rate” - but only in the foot notes does it mention that by the 18th month there is a combined"discontinuation rate" of almost 1/4 of the participants (they don’t say WHY they discontinued use). This is a study I’ve seen sighted multiple times at pro life/Catholic sites - but making any claims about this information being accurate and touting that very high “success” rate in my opinion at best is misleading - at worst dishonest
Feel free to be uncharitable. In fact, you already have been.Greetings Maryjk,
Yes I do. We as Catholics are encouraged to learn about our faith. Should this not have been an area that you researched even if you did not know about what the Church taught about Contraception when you were using it? I need to stop before my response gets a bit more uncharitable. [Next paragraph]
I do not know how anyone could be a Catholic and not just happen to know that contraception in all forms are wrong. I have a very hard time in believing that there are people out there who have been Catholic that just do not know these Church doctrines.
Open your eyes. There are lots of people that simply do not know the teachings of the Church on contraception. Just look around here.Perhaps I am being a bit hard in my reply, but it’s pretty hard not to know that Abortion is wrong, contraception is wrong, and ect.
Or maybe grew up in the 70’s when contraception was never mentioned. Or maybe didn’t have the internet growing up. Or maybe lived in a house where people thought practicing their faith included simply going to Mass on Sunday.If you had lived on an island all your life and just learned about the Faith, then I just might understand this position that you are positing. As it is, I just see in most cases this as a justification as to continue on using contraception.
I think I will stay out of these types of threads because 1. People already have decided for themselves whether they will use contraception or not depsite what the Teaching of the Church is. 2. You can lead a horse to water but you cannot force him to drink.
I am glad the person that spoke to me about the teachings didn’t have your attitude. Otherwise, I might still be in the dark and still using ABC. Instead, she talked to me about it and I am now, and have been for many years using NFP.God Bless.
Anathama Sit
Lol now i think I may read this just so I can see how bad it is for myself!I read the Wilson article.
All I can say is Wow!!!
Bias…Bias…Bias…
In fact, anyone that writes articles like that has no right to call themselves researchers. They should stick with writing opinion pieces.
That’s coming from someone with a science degree that spent years reviewing various articles for publication (my first job out of college). I also spent years after that reading articles pertaining to nutritional-related matters after that looking for bias (and found plenty).
The population sample selected for that article is a specific subset of the general population. It is not representative of the entire population of data, and it is entirely inappropriate to apply what that study shows to the general population.
I could start going through why, but I have a busy day at work.