Who do you talk to? Where do you hear such nonsense?
Hi rondirect, Iâd be happy to explain what I mean. This forum is, as you have seen, is the âhomeâ of a lot of wonderful people of different points of view. Many of my best friends are Catholic too, so I hope that you will take my words seriously.
Attitudes can be hard to discern in a totally written forum where we canât see the faces or hear the voices of the people we are communicating with. So naturally, we can only discern attitudes by the words we are using with each other. If you read through this whole topic from the beginning, what you will find is lots of Catholics who are very confident that only the CC is the one established by God, and that only the CC has complete unity (one-ness). In addition, you will find the usual Catholic talking points, such as:
- The fact that the apostle Peter was named, ârockâ by Jesus, the keys to the kingdom were given to Peter only, and these facts, among a few others, is how we can know that there is apostolic succession in the CC alone.
- The teachings of the CC are infallible because only the CC has this infallible authority given to it by Jesus.
- The others (non-Catholics) donât have the âreal presenceâ in the Lordâs Supper; only Catholics have it.
- History is clear on the authority of the Catholic Church, so there is no historical reason to doubt this.
I could add several other talking points, but you get my point.
Those of us who have rejected Romeâs authority are often reminded (here) that our own private interpretation of the bible is not a good thing; we need the infallible authority of âThe Churchâ (guess which one) in order to understand the bible correctly.
Why is there such emphasis on the
religious institution here? I have thought about this a lot over the past several years. One partial explanation: the CC has issued several ancient âclarificationsâ on the authority of the Catholic Church. Among these, are âunum sanctamâ, the bull that proclaimed, âExtra Ecclesiam nulla salusâ: âoutside of the Church, there is no salvationâ .
This isnât âchurch authorityâ, it is church abuse. Since the Catholic Church no longer supports this error, it is to be credited, but some of the lingering damage remains to this day, and it can clearly be noticed by the Catholic talking points mentioned above. The reason for my selection of this topic, is to shed some light on all of this. I want to make one last point: I donât see these âtalking pointsâ in
most Catholics that I know, and most Catholics avoid âchurch worshipâ. I brought it up only because I see it here frequently.