Why is it important that Jews recognize Jesus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Splinker
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If Jews follow their faith, you have two sets of people behaving morally and loving God, is it really important that they change how they worship God by believing in Jesus? I guess this is a two part question. What is the importance rationally and what is the importance theologically?
Hi, Splinker,
You have asked a significant question. Rationally, it wouldn’t be important. Theologically, the importance is captured in Isaiah 53:10-11 and Isaiah 61:1-5. It has to do with being healed spiritually in this life and the next, through making an “offering for sin” that brings to the individual person a complete inner knowledge of lasting personal peace, and brings to the group collectively a fervent desire to follow a peace-loving, forgiving lifestyle while following a Shepherd who knows precisely how to lead toward that end, if the group follows with all their hearts. Wishing you great peace and joy in your life.🙂
 
To go back to the thread 🙂
In short, it is important for the Jews to recognize Jesus because he is their Messiah and their God.

Now there are many reasons why the Jewish people has not as a whole embraced Jesus and entered in the New Covenant.

The reason that stands out considering most of the post of this thread seems to be the lukewarmness of the Catholics:

Many Catholics are ill-equipped to explain their faith coherently, much less to explain the Jewish roots of Catholic doctrines. Others are intimidated by the task or not even interested in doing so. Others have been influenced by dual-covenant theology or have given in to the demands of political correctness, thinking that it is inappropriate to pray that Jews would come to faith in Jesus or shying away from witnessing their faith to them. How often does one hear prayers for the salvation of Israel during the intercessions of the faithful at Mass? How often do you bring this intention before the Lord in your own private prayers? The Epistle of James reminds us: “you do not have because you do not ask.” (Jam 4:1). The question must be asked how many Catholics are inspired by the apostle’s “great sorrow and unceasing anguish in [his] heart” and willingness to be “accursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of [his] brethren,” the Jews. One of the greatest stumbling blocks that has always kept people away from the faith has been that Christians have not loved enough. How much do we care or pray that the veil be lifted from the eyes of the Chosen People that they may recognize their Messiah, not forgetting that this moment will be like “life from the dead” (Rom 11:15) for the entire world?
I think your answer is insulting to both Jews and Catholics. Not intentionally perhaps, but still. To say that Jews cling to their religion only because Catholics are luke warm to them? Come on.
 
Hi, Splinker,
You have asked a significant question. Rationally, it wouldn’t be important. Theologically, the importance is captured in Isaiah 53:10-11 and Isaiah 61:1-5. It has to do with being healed spiritually in this life and the next, through making an “offering for sin” that brings to the individual person a complete inner knowledge of lasting personal peace, and brings to the group collectively a fervent desire to follow a peace-loving, forgiving lifestyle while following a Shepherd who knows precisely how to lead toward that end, if the group follows with all their hearts. Wishing you great peace and joy in your life.🙂
Thank you. Joy and peace to you and your family as well. I feel that I am healed spiritually in this life through my faith in God via Judaism. I’ve seen little in this world that would lead me to believe that a Christian has any greater chance at inner peace and a peace-loving lifestyle than a Jew or anyone else. This is not a dig at Christianity.

But my question perhaps could have been phrased better. Does the Church believe that Jews can achieve the same degree of spiritual wholeness and merit the same rewards in the next world, as a Christian?
 
If Jesus is who He claimed to be the Son of G-d, Messiah and Saviour of all then yes. Not only Jews but all mankind must recognize Him as such.
Why? Is it not possible for God to manifest Himself in different ways to different people? Why is it a matter involving my immortal soul and the fate of a nation, that we worship God by recognizing Jesus as His son?
 
Does the Church believe that Jews can achieve the same degree of spiritual wholeness and merit the same rewards in the next world, as a Christian?
As an individual Christian, my personal answer would be yes Splinker.
I guess as evidence, apart from my own feelings on the subject, i’d quote the parable of the good Samaritan. (in reverse 🙂 ).

I think God acts in the world for a purpose that is not always apparent to us. As a Christian we would say that the Old Covenant was added to by God for a more inclusive brotherhood and the witness of Jesus gives man an insight into the invisible God, what He is like, what He cares about, and how we are to conduct our lives in relationship to eachother and Him.

I guess it really depends on whether “someone” accepts God as acting in this second Covenant (or supposed second Covenant) by way of incarnation, or not, and whether someone wants to be part of it.

I would say personally that if you are at peace with God in your life where you are now, then that is really great. If you are ambivalent or doubtful about Christianity it’s not up to me to convice you otherwise, and i guess i shouldn’t try unless you ask.

As a Christian (accepting Christianity as true) i would say it’s important as a lesson in spiritual awareness and part of a greater universal plan involving God and humanity, but on the personal level (while helpful) it is not imperative for the personal outcomings you list.

Saying that, i would think the Jewish people will also continue to be part of God’s plan, but of course i say that from a Christian perspective.

God’s perspective i guess, is what counts more than any of ours. 🙂
 
Thank you. Joy and peace to you and your family as well. I feel that I am healed spiritually in this life through my faith in God via Judaism. I’ve seen little in this world that would lead me to believe that a Christian has any greater chance at inner peace and a peace-loving lifestyle than a Jew or anyone else. This is not a dig at Christianity.

But my question perhaps could have been phrased better. Does the Church believe that Jews can achieve the same degree of spiritual wholeness and merit the same rewards in the next world, as a Christian?
Splinker,
I think the person who writes as “Abucs” has given a very insightful and helpful reply to your question. I appreciate your heartfelt wish for me and my family. Thanks!

If one follows the peace-bringing teachings of the Old Testament, they will experience personal and family peace, no doubt, and gain “spiritual wholeness”. You would be familiar with the Psalm that begins with the attestation, “The Lord is my shepherd.” It sounds like you have made the Lord your shepherd, and that His promises have become your promises. If you have, He will lead you along and will guide you where He needs you to be led to find the green pasture and the still waters where He can continue to bring you peace.

Have you ever considered that since Christians believe in the same God as the Jews, and believe that He guided the Jews and the whole nation of Israel and wanted that nation to keep their covenant with Him, that as Jews enter into and keep that same eternal covenant with pure hearts, that the God of Israel will keep His promises to them? It was intended to be an everlasting covenant, and no doubt God will keep His part of that covenant. Making that covenant means making the Lord one’s shepherd, and being continuously led by Him through the strength of that everlasting covenant.

Note also that there was a purpose in the law of sacrifice given to Moses, and it pointed toward the need for sin offerings to heal the people. While keeping your everlasting covenant, it would be important to seek the Lord’s will as to how sin offerings are made in order that they be accepted by Him whom you worship. That sin offering is an important aspect of gaining “spiritual wholeness”, because it satisfies an eternal law in the universe. He who made the law will guide you in keeping the law, as you make the Lord your shepherd, no?

Again, great peace, joy, and love to you and your family.
 
Splinker
Unfortunately, your response shows that you didn’t take the time to read the article that I had linked to my post.
I have simply pointed out, among various reasons why most Jews don’t believe in Jesus, the responsability that we Christians bear in this situation.
As a Jew you have the right to hear about our belief in Jesus Messiah of Israel, came to fulfill all the propheties, to reconcile us with God and usher the New Covenant (Jr 31, 31) thus restoring the davidic kingdom and reuniting the 12 tribes of Israel.

Now, you can simply dismiss these claims, but exposing our belief is no way insulting you.

שלום
 
Splinker
Unfortunately, your response shows that you didn’t take the time to read the article that I had linked to my post.
I have simply pointed out, among various reasons why most Jews don’t believe in Jesus, the responsability that we Christians bear in this situation.
As a Jew you have the right to hear about our belief in Jesus Messiah of Israel, came to fulfill all the propheties, to reconcile us with God and usher the New Covenant (Jr 31, 31) thus restoring the davidic kingdom and reuniting the 12 tribes of Israel.

Now, you can simply dismiss these claims, but exposing our belief is no way insulting you.

שלום
I did not read your link. I did not say you were insulting me. The premise that Jews are only Jewish because Christians have a lukewarm attitude toward Judaism, is demeaning to the Jewish religion.
 
Splinker,
Have you ever considered that since Christians believe in the same God as the Jews, and believe that He guided the Jews and the whole nation of Israel and wanted that nation to keep their covenant with Him, that as Jews enter into and keep that same eternal covenant with pure hearts, that the God of Israel will keep His promises to them?
I’m unclear on what you are saying here. Are you talking about Jews keeping their covenants with God? I’m not sure what Christian concepts, if any, you are referring to here.

I think that perhaps there is a difference of opinion/understanding on the importance of the sin offering in Judaism. A new thread on this subject might be interesting, discussing the unintentional and intentional sin offering in Judiasm. My experience when discussing this with Christians is that the concept of sacrifices in the Temple are viewed very differently by Jews and Christians.
 
Splinker
in reading the link, you would have understood that I was not saying that the lukewarm attitude of my Catholic brethren is the only reason Jewish do not accept Jesus…
The stress I put on this aspect has been motivated by different posts exposing the view that it isn’t important that Jews recognize Jesus…
 
Why? Is it not possible for God to manifest Himself in different ways to different people? Why is it a matter involving my immortal soul and the fate of a nation, that we worship God by recognizing Jesus as His son?
Hi Splinker, according to the OT ( not trying to imply that it is old or irrevelent ) G-d is clear as to Himself being the only way to eternal life. Is 45:5 I am the LORD, and there is no other; apart from me there is no God. I will strengthen you, though you have not acknowledged me. Israel was chastised many times because they went after other gods. He is a jealous G-d and wants the best for His people. Ex 34:14 Do not worship any other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God. Ultimately He sets the terms and we must abide in them.

The knowledge of a coming Messiah is throughout the OT. G-d is longing for a relationship with His people. Messiah was sent to reconcile men back to Himself.

May I ask, if you knew that G-d wanted a personal relationship with you and showed how to do it would accept ? You don’t have to answer here it’s a personal question for you to answer to yourself.
 
Splinker;6119736 said:
I would like to respond if I you would let me. The sin offering offering is central to both faiths. Blood must be shed because of the gravity of sin. In Genisis G-d killed an animal/s to cover the first sin of Adam and Eve. Animals had to be sacrificed continually to cover the reoccouring sins. Jesus was a sin offering on the cross. His once sacrificial offering is suffecient forever for the remission of sins. So that anyone who would put their faith in Him as the Lamb of G-d without spot or blemish would have eternal life.

Have you ever read or studied Messianic prophecies in the bible? Let me know if this is makes sense.
 
I could never understand how the Jewish people do not recognize Christ as their Messiah. When it so clearly states so in every Book in the Old Testament. I seriously cannot figure out who they think the Prophets are actually talking about. For instance, many believe that the “Suffering Servant” in Isaiah, “Whose Stripes we are healed” is actually Israel. They think the Prophets are speaking about the Country and not Christ…I don’t get it. I feel sort of sorry for those who do not believe. Their days are numbered.
I’m no believer in the Messiah but I can tell you Jesus did not fulfill the Prophecies.
 
I’m unclear on what you are saying here. Are you talking about Jews keeping their covenants with God? I’m not sure what Christian concepts, if any, you are referring to here.

I think that perhaps there is a difference of opinion/understanding on the importance of the sin offering in Judaism. A new thread on this subject might be interesting, discussing the unintentional and intentional sin offering in Judiasm. My experience when discussing this with Christians is that the concept of sacrifices in the Temple are viewed very differently by Jews and Christians.
Splinker,
What I was trying to say is that the Jews are a covenant people with covenant promises from God if they keep their covenant or come back to their covenant if they had departed from it, according to many Old Testament scriptures. Keeping that covenant with God means that they will be led somewhere, no? (just as the children of Israel were led to a promised land). The Christian concept of being willing to be led by God to a sure and peaceful earthly dwelling place and a heavenly dwelling place, are given repeatedly in the Old Testament. The Jews have the same promise through keeping their covenant with God, which means being willing to be led by God and let Him be their shepherd.

It might surprise you that there may be similarities you may not be aware of between the concepts of sin offerings and sacrifices and how carefully and prayerfully they needed to be done in the Temple, and the great and last sacrifice believed in by Christianity that allows for reconciliation from sin just as sin offerings allowed for that reconciliation for the covenant people.
 
Hmm. Perhaps the most widely-acknowledged “intellectual” Cardinal of the Catholic Church (who recently passed away) but was beloved by the Pope and faithful had this to say in his article “Who Can Be Saved” published in the religious journal First Things which has such Jewish luminosities in its editorial board as Rabbi Novak, David Dallin, and Norman Podhoretz’s (of Commentary fame) wife Midge Decter.

The Cardinal writes: it is the responsibility of believers to help these seekers by word and by example. Whoever receives the gift of revealed truth has the obligation to share it with others. Christian faith is normally transmitted by testimony. Believers are called to be God’s witnesses to the ends of the earth.

Who, then, can be saved? Catholics can be saved if they believe the Word of God as taught by the Church and if they obey the commandments. Other Christians can be saved if they submit their lives to Christ and join the community where they think he wills to be found. Jews can be saved if they look forward in hope to the Messiah and try to ascertain whether God’s promise has been fulfilled. Adherents of other religions can be saved if, with the help of grace, they sincerely seek God and strive to do his will. Even atheists can be saved if they worship God under some other name and place their lives at the service of truth and justice. God’s saving grace, channeled through Christ the one Mediator, leaves no one unassisted. But that same grace brings obligations to all who receive it. They must not receive the grace of God in vain. Much will be demanded of those to whom much is given.

firstthings.com/article/2008/02/001-who-can-be-saved-8

In all honesty, to clear up potential discrepancies, one really should read that entire article in whole. We’re trying to condense 2,000 years in one paragraph.

If some Catholic feels they know more about this than the eminent late Cardinal, O.K. - I don’t object to the Cardinal’s view. (continued below)
 
From the same authoritative Cardinal on “The Covenant with Israel”:

Does Israel cease to be the People of God?

For an answer to this question the key text would seem to be, for Christians, chapters nine through eleven of Romans. Paul’s thought in these chapters is exceedingly complex and has given rise to a variety of interpretations. Perhaps Paul himself intended to leave some questions open. He ends the section with an exclamation of awe-filled humility before the incomprehensible ways of God: “O the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable are his ways!”

Without any pretense of giving a final solution I shall try to indicate some elements of a tenable Catholic position. Paul in this passage clearly teaches that God has not rejected His People, for His gifts and call are irrevocable. As regards election, they are unceasingly beloved for the sake of their forefathers. “If they do not persist in their unbelief,” he says, the children of Israel “will be grafted in” to the olive tree from which they have been cut off. He predicts that in the end “all Israel will be saved” and that their reconciliation and full inclusion will mean life from the dead. God’s continuing love and fidelity to his promises indicate that the Old Covenant is still in force in one of its most important aspects—God’s gracious predilection for His Chosen People.

Pope John Paul II, whose theology was deeply affected by personalism, spoke of the Jews as a covenant people. In an address in Rome on October 31, 1997, he discussed the act of divine election that brought this people into existence: “This people is assembled and led by Yahweh, creator of heaven and of earth. Its existence is therefore not purely a fact of nature or of culture in the sense that the resourcefulness proper to one’s nature is expressed in culture. It is a supernatural fact. This people perseveres despite everything because it is the people of the covenant, and despite human infidelities, Yahweh is faithful to his covenant. To ignore this most basic principle is to adopt a Marcionism against which the church immediately and vigorously reacted, conscious of a vital link with the Old Testament, without which the New Testament itself is emptied of meaning.”

Vatican II brought out the profound truth that the mystery of Israel and the mystery of the Church are permanently intertwined: “As this sacred people searches into the mystery of the Church, it recalls the spiritual bond linking the people of the New Covenant to Abraham’s stock.” The Church is conscious that she is a branch grafted onto the olive tree of Israel. Pope John Paul II was deeply conscious of this affinity. Speaking at the synagogue of Rome on April 13, 1986, he made the point: “The Jewish religion is not ‘extrinsic’ to us, but in a certain way is ‘intrinsic’ to our own religion. With Judaism, therefore, we have a relationship which we do not have with any other religion. You are our dearly beloved brothers and, in a certain way, it could be said that you are our elder brothers.”

In continuity with Vatican II and earlier Catholic tradition, John Paul II saw the two covenants as intrinsically related. The Old is a preview and promise of the New; the New is the unveiling and fulfillment of the Old. “The New Covenant,” he declared, “serves to fulfill all that is rooted in the vocation of Abraham, in God’s covenant with Israel at Sinai, and in the whole rich heritage of the inspired Prophets who, hundreds of years before that fulfillment, pointed in the Sacred Scriptures to the One whom God would send in the ‘fullness of time.’

Some Christians, in their eagerness to reject a crude supersessionism, give independent validity to the Old Covenant. They depict the Old and New Covenants as two ‘separate but equal’ parallel paths to salvation, the one intended for Jews, the other for gentiles. The commentator Roy H. Schoeman correctly remarks this thesis “has been presented as though it were the only logical alternative to supersessionism, despite the fact that it is utterly irreconcilable with both the core beliefs of Christianity and with the words of Jesus himself in the New Testament.” Joseph Fitzmyer, in his scholarly commentary on Romans, likewise opposes the theory of two separate ways of salvation: “It is difficult to see how Paul would envisage two different kinds of salvation, one brought about by God apart from Christ for Jews, and one by Christ for Gentiles and believing Jews. That would seem to militate against his whole thesis of justification and salvation by grace for all who believe in the gospel of Christ Jesus (1:16). For Paul the only basis for membership in the new people of God is faith in Christ Jesus.”

It is unthinkable that in these chapters of Romans Paul would be proposing salvation for Jews apart from Christ. He spent much of his ministry seeking to evangelize his fellow Jews. In the very passage in which he speaks of God’s abiding love for Israel, he confesses his great sorrow and anguish at Israel’s unbelief. He would be ready, he says, to be accursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of his brethren, his kinsmen by race, who have not accepted Jesus as Messiah.

The Catholic Church clearly teaches that no one will be condemned for unbelief, or for incomplete belief, without having sinned against the light. Those who with good will follow the movements of God’s grace in their own lives are on the road to salvation. They are not required to profess belief in Christ unless or until they are in a position to recognize him as Messiah and Lord. The fact that Jews and Christians have honest differences about this point is a powerful incentive for dialogue between them.

It really helps to read the whole article:
firstthings.com/article/2008/08/the-covenant-with-israel—42
 
Hmm. Perhaps the most widely-acknowledged “intellectual” Cardinal of the Catholic Church (who recently passed away) but was beloved by the Pope and faithful had this to say in his article “Who Can Be Saved” published in the religious journal First Things which has such Jewish luminosities in its editorial board as Rabbi Novak, David Dallin, and Norman Podhoretz’s (of Commentary fame) wife Midge Decter on its Board.

The Cardinal writes: it is the responsibility of believers to help these seekers by word and by example. Whoever receives the gift of revealed truth has the obligation to share it with others. Christian faith is normally transmitted by testimony. Believers are called to be God’s witnesses to the ends of the earth.

Who, then, can be saved? Catholics can be saved if they believe the Word of God as taught by the Church and if they obey the commandments. Other Christians can be saved if they submit their lives to Christ and join the community where they think he wills to be found. Jews can be saved if they look forward in hope to the Messiah and try to ascertain whether God’s promise has been fulfilled. Adherents of other religions can be saved if, with the help of grace, they sincerely seek God and strive to do his will. Even atheists can be saved if they worship God under some other name and place their lives at the service of truth and justice. God’s saving grace, channeled through Christ the one Mediator, leaves no one unassisted. But that same grace brings obligations to all who receive it. They must not receive the grace of God in vain. Much will be demanded of those to whom much is given.

firstthings.com/article/2008/02/001-who-can-be-saved-8

In all honesty, to clear up potential discrepancies, one really should read that entire article in whole. We’re trying to condense 2,000 years in one paragraph.

If some Catholic feels they know more about this than the eminent late Cardinal, O.K. - I don’t object to the Cardinal’s view. (continued below)
****ing WOW!! BTW I’m half Ukrainian Jew by the surname of Hoshko … ****ing WOW! ill shake your hand anytime (its a reference to “Fiddler on the Roof”) Wow!, well put.
 
And from Rabbi David Novak in First Things in “Jews, Christians, and Civil Society”:

What we Jews can learn from Christians is that (regardless of whatever else
we might be) we are first and foremost a religion. Now, unfortunately, many
Jews and many Christians have been deluded by Jewish secularists to think that
Judaism—or “Jewishness”—is not a religion because even nonreligious Jews are
considered to be part of the Jewish people. Therefore, it is argued that Jews
are an “ethnic group” for whom Jewish religion is an arbitrary form of identification.
But this is backward. Even nonreligious Jews, even atheistic Jews, are part
of the Jewish people because to be a Jew is to be a member of a community elected
by God. That is fundamentally different both from choosing one’s own society
and the mere accident of birth. It is God who makes a Jew a Jew. It is not a
human choice—neither our own, nor that of our ancestors, nor that of our enemies.
Election is a fundamentally religious event initiated by God, not man. Thus
those who repudiate their obligation to keep the commandments of the Torah—that
is, Judaism—may have left Judaism in practice, but they are still part of Judaism
by their very existence. Speaking figuratively, they have gone AWOL, but they
may not be court-martialed. Of course, we practicing Jews hope and pray that
these sons and daughters who have strayed from the covenantal home will return,
but neither our souls nor theirs would be well served if we attempted to coerce
them back into the fold.

For most Jews, election begins at birth; it thus precedes any choice on the
part of the Jew. As for those who convert to Judaism, their decision must be
conceived as a compulsion that originally comes from God alone. Their free consent
is a necessary but not sufficient condition of their being accepted as Jews.
The same is true for Christians. If baptism is indelible, and if most Christians
are baptized as infants, then most Christians become Christians like most Jews
become Jews. This is so even in the cases of Christians who are “born again”
and who are baptized as adults. Birth is, after all, the most involuntary event
possible. (Incidentally, the term “born again” appears in Greek in the New Testament
and in Hebrew in the Talmud.) It is only a modern, voluntaristic view of the
covenant as a social contract that supposes that being a Jew or being a Christian
is an individual option that is initiated or terminated by human will…

Jewish and Christian interests are thus parallel in many matters. But do we
have something more than just parallels going for us? Is there some point at
which we truly intersect?

On the theological level, as we have seen, we do intersect in the sense that
both Judaism and Christianity are the traditions of two separate communities
who are still emerging out of the same Hebrew Bible and the same Second Temple
Judaism. The recovery of that reality has been an exercise of fruitful commonality
between Jews and Christians of late, especially among our scholars. And that
scholarship has had an effect on our broader communities, too. Nevertheless,
theological intersection is limited by the agreement of both sides in the Jewish-Christian
dialogue to avoid proselytizing. That necessarily means that we cannot make
our full truth claims to each other theologically and expect the other side
to sit still and listen to what could only be perceived as conversionist rhetoric.
As such, theological dialogue between Jews and Christians can only work when
these ultimate claims are consciously bracketed. That is why many Jews and Christians
have stayed away from the dialogue. But today, truth be happily told, many Jewish
and Christian theologians have begun to speak to each other under this constraint
in good faith and with good results. Yet, at this point, our lines are still
more parallel than perpendicular. Our theological intersection is little more
than the affirmation of our common beginning.
firstthings.com/article/2007/06/002-jews-christians-and-civil-society-35

Honest discussion on all citations. Some one can agree with Cardinal Dulles and/or Rabbi David Novak, some possibly not. At least it’s a start at understanding our beliefs.
 
****ing WOW!! BTW I’m half Ukrainian Jew by the surname of Hoshko … ****ing WOW! ill shake your hand anytime (its a reference to “Fiddler on the Roof”) Wow!, well put.
Wow! I should have realized the Hoshko. 😃 Hey you’re still up in Alaska! That’s hilarious Hosh!! Ha! Ukrainian. Who knows about these things, my mom’s parents in Ukraine were Orthodox and Catholic respectively, but mom’s maiden name is “Isaac” - not very Ukrainian sounding I guess. Who knows. Great to have you on board Hosh.

And yes, I will shake your hand anytime.🙂 (just be clear with me up front, so I know I’m not wagering on a cow - also from Fiddler on the Roof).

Were your parents or grandparents from Ukraine, or one of them. Both mine were. Huh, small world, but my eyes are getting sleepy in Toronto.

I might pass out… Hosh:D:D:D:D:

Happy New Year!!! Andrew
 
Holy ****! Two of eight of my great grandparents immigrated from Ukraine in the 1880’s in accordance with the may laws. Eventually they made there way to Cleveland, Oh… not so far from Toronto. It was a Chasidic family of 17, and were all related so I was a little afraid to admit my last name.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top