Y
Young_Thinker
Guest
Is it usually because the bishop of that diocese doesn’t feel that they are needed? I wouldn’t think that it’s for financial reasons since deacons tend to either have day jobs or be retirees.
They can also preach at Mass. I forgot about that – or maybe I intentionally blocked it out of my mind.I can only speak for my diocese, and for the most part only my deanery, but here locally I think it’s a cost vs. benefit sort of thing.
What can a deacon do that a layperson cannot? They can impart a blessing in the Name of the Holy Trinity. They can conduct matrimonial liturgies. They can proclaim the Gospel during Mass. That’s pretty much it…
Why?I can only speak for my diocese, and for the most part only my deanery, but here locally I think it’s a cost vs. benefit sort of thing.
What can a deacon do that a layperson cannot? They can impart a blessing in the Name of the Holy Trinity. They can conduct matrimonial liturgies. They can proclaim the Gospel during Mass. That’s pretty much it.
**
You wouldn’t want your kids to be catechized by the deacons in my parish.** Both are also approved to provide the pre-Cana wedding training, but neither is requested by future married couples.
Both are difficult personalities (ironically, one was a real sweetheart before going through the diaconate formation) and their wives are even more difficult. All four have had a terrible impact on my parish – and will for many years to come. But because of their ordinations they cannot be quietly benched, They, along with their wives are destined to do damage in my parish for years to come. I think some pastors and bishops are sensitive to this sort of potential situation.
The priestly vocation and the diaconate are tremendously different vocations – it doesn’t seem logical that a man would be called to both. YET, if the Western Church ever allowed married priests, you can bet there would be a ton of permanent deacons at the head of the line to become priests which would cause some real suffering in the Church.
If the Church truly had a foolproof way to select the right candidates for the diaconate, the cost/benefit matter would be moot. But it does not.
Maybe it just comes across this way, but you seem to have a lot of problems with people in your parish.I can only speak for my diocese, and for the most part only my deanery, but here locally I think it’s a cost vs. benefit sort of thing.
What can a deacon do that a layperson cannot? They can impart a blessing in the Name of the Holy Trinity. They can conduct matrimonial liturgies. They can proclaim the Gospel during Mass. That’s pretty much it.
You wouldn’t want your kids to be catechized by the deacons in my parish. Both are also approved to provide the pre-Cana wedding training, but neither is requested by future married couples.
Both are difficult personalities (ironically, one was a real sweetheart before going through the diaconate formation) and their wives are even more difficult. All four have had a terrible impact on my parish – and will for many years to come. But because of their ordinations they cannot be quietly benched, They, along with their wives are destined to do damage in my parish for years to come. I think some pastors and bishops are sensitive to this sort of potential situation.
The priestly vocation and the diaconate are tremendously different vocations – it doesn’t seem logical that a man would be called to both. YET, if the Western Church ever allowed married priests, you can bet there would be a ton of permanent deacons at the head of the line to become priests which would cause some real suffering in the Church.
If the Church truly had a foolproof way to select the right candidates for the diaconate, the cost/benefit matter would be moot. But it does not.
There is also the matter of conducting formal Baptisms. As to the original question, in addition to the other factors already mentioned, I would think that in some places, clericalism would be another reason for the failure to implement or broadly support the permanent diaconate.They can also preach at Mass. I forgot about that – or maybe I intentionally blocked it out of my mind.
Yes…I think my parish had soneone move here from Omaha. He may have switched over to ministerial duties as an acolyte (not sure if he’s still at my parish, though). We do have deacons as in transitional deacons…and a few of these get assigned to parishes the summer before their last year of the seminary and they occassionally preach the homily. My own parish had a deacon from Vietnam at least ten years ago, for a few months until he was ordained a priest for our diocese, and then assigned to a pairsh in Hastings, He’s now at the 2nd parish (saint benedict’s) in Nebraska City as an assistant pastor.In my diocese (Lincoln) we have never had a permanent diaconate program. Bishop Flavin (1967-1992) and Bishop Bruskewitz (1992-2012) thought it might detract from the promotion of priestly vocations. Bishop Conley is on record as saying he won’t rule out a diaconate program sometime in the future, but for now, he has enough priests to meet the pastoral needs of the diocese.
There are a few deacons (three, I believe) who were ordained elsewhere and moved to the Diocese of Lincoln; they have been assigned various ministries (prisons, etc.).
The parish where I grew up (Archdiocese of Omaha) has a few deacons. One of them presided over the vigil (Rosary) for my dad the night before his funeral. The deacon was a longtime family friend and having him conduct the vigil was a tremendous blessing to our family.Deacons can also preside over funeral Liturgies of the Word, quite a welcome service in aging populations such as ours and as more families opt out of funeral Masses.
could be, yesI think it’s a number of factors (not listed in any order):
Hasn’t panned out that way here
- unknown long terms effects the Permanent Diaconate could have on Priestly ordinations and celibacy (Bishops with historically good numbers of priests and seminarians might be a little hesitant to jinx it by allowing Permanent Deacons)
2) perceived clericalism
- little interest among laity, esp in historically Catholic nations and poor nations.
**surprisingly, many men seem interested around here, but I get what you are saying, If you’re busy making a living, and probably can’t retire, you have little time for it. **- financial - how training is paid for (paid by diocese or by deacon)? And does diocese own their own seminary or do they have to pay a seminary or Catholic college for the training?
Men here pay their own way at classes given by lay PhD Theology profs and other priests- Training program (related to #4) - does National Conference or Diocese have an established training program?
**I have no idea who penned ours, but yes, they do. **- Need - if diocese has healthy numbers of priests per parish, the need for Permanent Deacons diminishes
** Priests per parish? LOL Most here have one priest One lone priest in 80% of the parishes.
**
Personally, I think for most of the diocese that lack them (esp in the 3rd world), it’s due to a lack of accessible training, either due to financial reasons or logistical reasons. Logistical reasons being that they lack an established training program locally or nationally.