Being the crusty old bat of nearly 54 that I am, I sat through, in the 1990s, many a sermon on the ‘miracle of sharing’ that Jesus ‘supervised’ through getting the people to ‘share what they had’ (of COURSE He couldn’t possibly have made 5 loaves and 2 fish feed 5000 people, that would have been so out of character for a simple humble man ya know?)
Now when that gospel comes around, usually the first thing our priests do is say, "I know you’re all waiting to hear about the miracle of how Jesus softened the hearts of people and got them to ‘share’ their food. Well, you’re going to have a long wait because that never happened. What really happened was a total miracle where Jesus took 5 loaves and 2 fish and was able to feed an entire crowd with just that–just as He today can feed the world with His body and blood. It was a foreshadowing. Now, that other story was a popular kind of idea that went well with society’s ‘cocooning’ of the 1990s, a kind of ‘we-the-community-will-share’ idea that went so far out of focus in thinking of Jesus as the "man who gives good example’ that it IGNORED the fact that Jesus is not just ‘the man’ but GOD.’
Why do I bring this up? To show that nice, good, average Catholic priests are like the rest of us. They bring in their ‘point of view’. As my pastor says (often), One must always remember that Jesus is God and man. And any time that we focus more on one OR the other, we will veer into heresy. Teaching about Jesus and neglecting any ‘miraculous’ deeds or teachings (as dear old TJ did) is focusing only on the MAN and not the GOD. . .and veers into heresy. Teaching about Jesus and focusing only the miraculous, like the many atheists who sneer, “So He died on the cross, big deal, He KNEW He was gonna come to life again, He’s not really like us at all” are focusing on the GOD and neglecting the MAN and obviously veering into heresy.
So Fr. J in speaking of Mary might be working from absolutely good and authentic teachings but ‘veering’ into a point of view that focuses a little too much in ‘one’ way and thus throws the teachings off and is in error.
Because so much of the ‘base’ of the teachings is true, it is harder to see the error. I mean, in the story of the loaves and fishes, we can see that the whole thing is ‘right there’. There is the crowd, there is Jesus, there He is breaking the food, and there the people are, well fed.
It is not explictly stated, "and to each man of the 5000 Jesus gave a piece from the very same loaf and/or fish’. And knowing that people might have some dried food ‘tucked away’ (as was common for us ‘bright’ people in the 1990s) and being inclined to try to make people ‘work together’, some bright boys theorized the ‘sharing’, probably first as a simple, “Yes, Jesus gave everybody just enough to satisfy, and then along with that people probably shared out some stuff and that’s why we got ‘leftovers’. . .” and then of course, the ‘anti-miracle’ crowd probably thought, “Hey, that would work with OUR program too, yay” and the "horizontal community worshippers’ were like, "Well of COURSE because after all it’s all about being FED and being “Church”. . .
Ah, the 90s. How we ever got out of the 20th century. . . .
So we don’t want to have the same problems with skewed theories about MARY as we did with the great ‘miracle of sharing’ that is STILL causing repercussions today.
And so we’ll do a Barney Fife and ‘nip it in the bud’ when possible!!!