T
Tantum_ergo
Guest
My priests ARE Dominicans and they would find Fr. John’s posts unacceptable.I still feel the same. I have waded through the gobledegook replies of “I was only showing a different point to view,” to paraphrase FrJohn’s explanations of what he was trying to say. I don’t know if any others got PMs from him and Padrej. I didn’t understand what they were trying to say in them either.They were extremely terse; bordering on aggressive.
I was so bewildered by what I was reading that I took FrJohn’s early posts to Mass on Sunday and showed them to a very learned priest. He read through them very carefully and said, “What a load of rubbish!”
I’d rather trust one of my own priests (Franciscan) than someone who says they were trained as a priest at a Dominican seminary but doesn’t know how to put what the Church teaches into words.
I would love to be wrong but I don’t think I am.
Heck, even the occasional Jesuit visitor would find them unacceptable!
I have to say that before I saw the “Dominican” and I had read Frs posts they actually looked like the old-school Jesuit style --you know, focus on the ‘similarities’, agree with the person and THEN once they have accepted you, start to work on pointing out the Catholic teaching. But even so, they really went ‘off the rails.’
Of course, we can all call ourselves what we will. I mean, Fr. could certainly be an authentic priest just as he claims. He could also be a 60 year old woman ‘priest’, a lay Catholic ‘dissenter’ trying to get ‘credibility’, a Protestant trying to play games, or even a non Christian out for who knows what.
I’ll judge (and I may do so legitimately) by both the Church itself . . .and by the ‘fruits’ of the teachings.
:grouphug: