S
SHW
Guest
I was merely quoting Scripture verses which seem to say that salvation can be lost, using the terms “lost” and "lose."Using the phrase " salvation can be lost" creates a lot of problems when trying to make these concepts clear to our separated brethren, who have not received the Apostolic Teaching, and have been misled to beleive that initial justification is complete and eternal.
Originally Posted by SHW Luke 9:25 “For what is a man profited if he gains the whole world, and loses or forfeits himself?”
Hasn’t he lost his salvation if he loses or forfeits himself? If you are not “saved,” then aren’t you “unsaved?”Originally posted by guanophore: This is better terminology to use than “saved/unsaved” when in dialog with our separated brethren. This terminology is biblical (“unsaved” is not) and will not get them confused with their erroneous understandings of the word “salvation”.
The definition of terms pertaining to salvation topics depends on to whom you are speaking. I think it would be best to find out what definitions they give the terms they use when discussing salvation.
As Scripture shows, the words: justification, salvation, saved, reconciliation, inherit or enter eternal life, righteous, and “grafted in,” etc. are all used to explain a “right relationship” with God and this often makes for confusing dialog.
Originally Posted by SHW:
Romans 11:22 “Behold then the kindness and severity of God; to those who fell, severity, but to you, God’s kindness, if you continue in His kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off.”
No, I definitely don’t think that.Originally posted by guanophore: I hope you are not thinking that I do not espouse the Apostolic Teaching on salvation.![]()
Lost, death, die, cut off, dead, enemies, unrighteous, and “not inherit the kingdom of God,” etc. are all used in Scripture to signify that our salvation or “right relationship” with God is lost due to sin; whether original sin or our own personal sins.
Scripture does use the words “lose and lost” in reference to salvation topics.Originally posted by guanophore: All I am trying to communicate to you is that the phrase “lose salvation” is not the most effective one to employ when attempting to discuss the matter with evangelicals. They have a different understanding of the word, and because of what they understand about what we know of as “initial justification” they become stubborn and confused. … I had never considered “grafted/cut off” as an alternative to “saved/unsaved” but it is good food for thought.![]()
“Cut off the Vine (Christ)” is a good analogy to use.
John 15:5-6 “I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing. 6 If anyone does not abide in Me, he is cast out as a branch and is withered; and they gather them and throw them into the fire, and they are burned.”
Paul is so frustrated with some of the Galatians that he says:
Galatians 5:12 “I could wish that those who trouble you would even cut themselves off!”
Paul is talking about wishing that some of the Galatians would cut themselves off the Vine (Christ), or in other words, he is saying that they will no longer be saved. (They will separate themselves from the gospel of Christ by heresy if they continue to insist that circumcision is necessary for salvation.)
I use Romans 5:10 in order to explain the process of salvation because it shows that the initial reconciliation is not the only thing that saves us and that it is not just a one-time event.
We are reconciled to God by the free gift of grace but then we continue to be saved much more by His life.
Romans 5:10 “For if when we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, much more, having been reconciled, we shall be saved by His life.”
Peace,
SHW