J
JRKH
Guest
JRHK, I think the two points above is where there is contention for me. RCIA is not an education program. It should be about conversion. When I started RCIA it was in late October and I almost didn’t “get in” because they had already performed the Rite of Welcome. I had a very quick conversion (too the point of a sense of physical shock/violence). God wanted me in the Church; now. I don’t know why, but I certainly know what was written in my heart. When I talked to the RE Director I told them that I wanted to go to confession and asked if I could pray in the Adoration chapel. The answer: “no, not until we get closer to Easter.” If you have someone that walks in and professes the faith and is burning for the sacraments, then to what purpose should the sacraments be withheld? Luckily I found another parish in the neighboring diocese that understood that God calls us each in our own time.
Faith is not an education process. Education informs faith, but it does not produce faith. That is the biggest problem with RCIA being under the religious education banner; it’s treated like school. My take on it was that when the Lord calls my job was to help the person understand the call, not to say jump through hoop x, y, z. We are not talking about getting an engineering degree, we are talking about people answering the call in their heart. We had some people that were in RCIA for 6 weeks and others that were there for 4 years. We made sure they understood the pillars of the faith and could fully embrace the truth when they said “I believe and profess all that the holy Catholic Church believes, teaches, and proclaims to be revealed by God.” That is not to say they got a theology degree, but that they understood the non-negotiables (i.e. birth control, marriage, the Eucharist, Sunday obligations, etc. [the “sticking points” for many both in and out of the Church]). We covered “advanced topics” as part of on going mystagogy (most continued meeting with us and new candidates for 6 - 18 months after they were received). For us confirmation and the eucharist were not the destination, but the begining of the journey.
What was important was that they followed the Lords schedule for them, not something lain out in a lesson plan. The result; Of the 18 people that were there when I started in the second parish I know at least 12 that still regularly attend mass after 5 years. The first parish had 90 people and expected that less than a third would still be there in 3 years. Now which route seems to have produces better results?
Many good points in the above. Thanks for posting it.
You are right. My comparison of the two things contains flaws and I probably didn’t express it very well either. That sometimes happens with my thoughts…
My main point that I was trying to express is that, a person who is seeking something far less (an engineering degree for example) is willing to conform to the necessary requirements of the “system”, but those who are seeking the “pearl of great price” are not willing to wait just a bit??
That said, I agree wholeheartedly with your post and perhaps there are things that should be changed.
Also, as your own experience shows, the process can vary from place to place. I’m also aware that in some instances, where a person has already done a lot of study or perhaps is a trained minister who is converting, the RCIA process is waived…The priest meets with them a few times and then they are received into the Church.
In the end though I think what would help the process the most is the active involvement of the friend, or friends of the person inquiring. These people should be willing and available to do more than just point somebody at RCIA. They should be right there. Talking, reading, studying, answering questions etc.
Anyway - just my 2cents worth…
Peace
James