B
Byzantine_Wolf
Guest
I’ll save everyone time and say it’s not in there. This is what the Quran says regarding the crucifixion of Jesus:
That they said (in boast), “We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah”;- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not. [S. 4:157; Yusuf Ali]
Some comparative translations:
And [for] their saying, “Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah .” And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain. [Sahih International]
And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah’s messenger - they slew him not nor crucified him, but it appeared so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in doubt thereof; they have no knowledge thereof save pursuit of a conjecture; they slew him not for certain. [Pickthall]
And their saying: Surely we have killed the Messiah, Isa son of Marium, the messenger of Allah; and they did not kill him nor did they crucify him, but it appeared to them so (like Isa) and most surely those who differ therein are only in a doubt about it; they have no knowledge respecting it, but only follow a conjecture, and they killed him not for sure. [Shakir]
The only translation that comes close to the JRT is the one by Sahih International, but notice that the word “another” is in brackets, showing that it was added in and not in the original text (in the same manner Bibles often put words in italics). Most translations emphasize simply that it was made to appear that Jesus was crucified. In this wording, any of the Islamic beliefs mentioned before regarding S. 4:157 could be fit into it.
I would also not say the JRT is the most believed explanation for the crucifixion in Islam. It’s a bit like dispensationalism in Christianity - it’s the most well known, but not the most believed. A lot of Muslims I’ve spoken to think it was all just an illusion, or that Jesus just fainted and hence was buried alive in the tomb.
I will say that it is ironic the author of the Quran claims those who believe Jesus was crucified are full of conjecture, when there are so many wild theories floating around Muslims regarding what happened on a cross, whereas Christians know exactly what happened on the cross, as all four gospels give consistent accounts.
That they said (in boast), “We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah”;- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not. [S. 4:157; Yusuf Ali]
Some comparative translations:
And [for] their saying, “Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah .” And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain. [Sahih International]
And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah’s messenger - they slew him not nor crucified him, but it appeared so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in doubt thereof; they have no knowledge thereof save pursuit of a conjecture; they slew him not for certain. [Pickthall]
And their saying: Surely we have killed the Messiah, Isa son of Marium, the messenger of Allah; and they did not kill him nor did they crucify him, but it appeared to them so (like Isa) and most surely those who differ therein are only in a doubt about it; they have no knowledge respecting it, but only follow a conjecture, and they killed him not for sure. [Shakir]
The only translation that comes close to the JRT is the one by Sahih International, but notice that the word “another” is in brackets, showing that it was added in and not in the original text (in the same manner Bibles often put words in italics). Most translations emphasize simply that it was made to appear that Jesus was crucified. In this wording, any of the Islamic beliefs mentioned before regarding S. 4:157 could be fit into it.
I would also not say the JRT is the most believed explanation for the crucifixion in Islam. It’s a bit like dispensationalism in Christianity - it’s the most well known, but not the most believed. A lot of Muslims I’ve spoken to think it was all just an illusion, or that Jesus just fainted and hence was buried alive in the tomb.
I will say that it is ironic the author of the Quran claims those who believe Jesus was crucified are full of conjecture, when there are so many wild theories floating around Muslims regarding what happened on a cross, whereas Christians know exactly what happened on the cross, as all four gospels give consistent accounts.