"Why It Won’t Stop With Statues." Article on why it can be expected that the mayhem will get worse

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdgspencer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If poverty were the sole cause of crime, the countries like India would have higher crime rates that the USA, but they don’t.

Also, crime wouldn’t exist among the wealthy, but the fact is, white collar crime is real and often does more harm than a kids holding up a neighborhood store.

The main cause of crime is the lack of respect for others and the digression of basic moral values where the post-modernists have made morality a relative issue rather than follow the laws God gave us. Instead, they want to play God and have society live by their moral laws, or lack of them.
 
We went for a ride in the country yesterday…as we were driving on some country roads…a beer joint had a sign in the front “Bar Lives Matter”…we were driving in the direction of this historical park that had a statue of Stephen F. Austin…I remember this statue because I lived in the area as a little girl, many, many years ago. As we were driving I was hoping that the statue was till in the park…I felt emotional as we approached the park and…yes, it was still there! 😌
 
Black Lives Matter, like all critical race theory submovements, was created by a trio of black radical feminists who used it to center themselves in an African American community that they increasingly found themselves disconnected from by nature of their educational and cultural background. BLM (the Org) proudly admits its core members are professionally trained Marxist agitators.

It has since been adopted by liberal whites as a general bludgeon against conservative government and the boogeyman of white males. But that adoption didn’t happen spontaneously - MSM sources have been intentionally stoking racial strife in the US with no accountability.

The best move to save black lives would be to increase police resources to actually deter and solve gun crimes, but that’s considered racist. Why not allow black people to take control of their destinies instead of treating them like perpetual victims - who’s going to take responsibility for the 73% of all black children that are born out of wedlock? Certainly not the black community itself.

What really concerns me is the ease with which MSM is able to dominate public thought. The big networks are sinister enemies of the people, and their “leaders” aim to provoke resentment. Same with education. Want to get funding? What to get published? Easy, make a thesis on systemic racial grievances. It’s almost as if universities incentivize topics of study for the express purpose of proving a desired result.

It won’t stop with statues because “the aggrieved” peoples of actual injustice are not the ones burning down courthouses, so they are not at the table, and unable to engage in reconciliation in good faith. Their cause has been hijacked by political forces who are not remotely interested in reconciliation, but have been using MSM lies as a gambit to sway public opinion for their own purposes. This is why many conservatives (black conservatives included) are not on board with BLM. It is a golem of sorts, that is bent on destroying race relations and undoing the progress made since MLK.

It won’t stop with statues because the media will not suffer this country to be undivided. It can’t be stopped so long as people believe the lie that the movement was predicated on- that blacks systemically and disproportionately suffer unwarranted force by LE because of racism. Why is it that so many black cops have been threatened and silenced when they attempted to refute BLM’s claims of systematic brutality? But it doesn’t matter to the rioters whether it is true or not, they believe it to be true. How can a person (or an entire demographic) make restitution for a collective sin that doesn’t exist? And if it does exist, and there is contrition, what happens when the next incarnation of BLM is not satisfied by destruction of property and demands a more severe penance? Would every white generation need to atone for their uniquely wicked Adamic nature?

Why do we allow godless MSM to define the extent to which systemic racism exists? Especially when these networks are not even trying anymore to hide their contempt for the Faithful?
 
Last edited:
Want to get funding? What to get published? Easy, make a thesis on systemic racial grievances. It’s almost as if universities incentivize topics of study for the express purpose of proving a desired result.
—Yes. That was part of my response to Rubee.
 
Black Lives Matter, like all critical race theory submovements, was created by a trio of black radical feminists who used it to center themselves in an African American community that they increasingly found themselves disconnected from by nature of their educational and cultural background. BLM (the Org) proudly admits its core members are professionally trained Marxist agitators.
Lots to unpack here.
None of which matters.
It has since been adopted by liberal whites as a general bludgeon against conservative government and the boogeyman of white males.
That’s what you think it’s for.
One of the biggest problems with political tribalism is the totem of the other side constructed as negatively as possible. We don’t discuss the point (valid or not) we accuse each other of subversion.

Think what we could accomplish if we just discussed the point.
But that adoption didn’t happen spontaneously - MSM sources have been intentionally stoking racial strife in the US with no accountability.
News will do that. Seen Tucker talk?
No one at the forefront of this movement cares about black lives.
That’s not true, I care.
The one thing that would save the most black lives would be to place exorbitantly high taxes on junk food, and every attempt to do that is called racist. After that the best move would be to increase police resources to actually deter and solve gun crimes, but that’s considered racist too.
Because you imply taxing junk food curbs racial bad habits.
The second is reinforcement of a system with racial discrimination baked in.
None of which is your own fault, history has been edited for the victor traditionally but the south campaigned hard to malign coloured people’s. How can you fix a problem if you don’t know it exists? Made all the more harder with the destructive totems we create instead of discussing them.
Why not allow black people to take control of their destinies instead of treating them like perpetual victims
How about we re write society so they can and stop insisting it’s fine.
What really concerns me is the ease with which MSM is able to dominate public thought. The big networks are sinister enemies of the people, and their “leaders” aim to provoke resentment. Same with education…
Again pointing to my totem point.
It is a golem of sorts, that is bent on destroying race relations and undoing the progress made since MLK.
There hasn’t been as much progress as you think and you are unaware of the steps backwards since.

Example The Miami Riot of 1980.
Police chase a motorcyclist who “crashed.” Later when evidence didn’t match testimony the police admitted they beat the man to death with flashlights.

They were acquitted.
 
None of which matters.
No that’s what you think. Organizational leadership that promotes tactics that are currently killing black people at an unprecedented level DOES matter. To say this leadership policy doesn’t matter is to say “black lives don’t matter.”
 
There hasn’t been as much progress as you think and you are unaware of the steps backwards since.
–You are wrong.

The US has elected a black president. For all their supposed integration and racial harmony, have the UK, France, Germany, etc., ever elected a black leader? Nope. Blacks have unprecedented levels of success, and opportunities, in the US, backed up by affirmative action preferences in education and employment.

“Steps backward?” Like what…some obscure trial from 1980 (40 years ago)?
 
Last edited:
Made all the more harder with the destructive totems we create instead of discussing them.
You don’t seem to want to discuss in good faith. Targeting only blacks would be wrong and racist, but that’s not what I typed. I argued that such a tax would save the most black lives. It would be wrong to not take a life-saving course of action just because doing so means admitting that some beneficiaries will benefit more than others.

Obesity for American blacks is a massive problem that shortens their lives and quality of life. The earlier onset of heart disease in the black community necessitates that if one - truly - cared about black lives, that one would support taxes and programs that made junk food less obtainable. Taxing specific foods types does curb consumption.

Would it actually work? Probably not without other forms of dietary assistance and lifestyle changes, and it would be impossible to enforce.
 
Something to think about, that I have no answer to: some politicians have proposed taxing soda, or, say, limiting the size of sodas - but what’s to prevent a person from, say, just buying 2 sodas with their Big Mac? I can’t really come up with a rejoinder.

BTW, I thought your first post made a lot of sense. Welcome!
 
Last edited:
Hi VonDerTann, I’m not sure either. Maybe offer free water, while charging what movie theaters charge for soda. At what point does a drink cost too much? Like the sin taxes on cigs, you still have people willing to spend $15 a pack.

The only rejoinder maybe: being poor. It’s more effective on the poor, for sure.
 
The US has elected a black president.
All that’s proves is most people are not proactively racist. It doesn’t address redlining, it doesn’t address police brutality. Those are problems baked into the fabric of society. When I say systemic racism it doesn’t have to have a grumpy old clout who won’t get with the times behind it.
Also doesn’t exclude that there is.
“Steps backward?” Like what…some obscure trial from 1980 (40 years ago)?
Yes because it illistrates that whats happening now was happing then and still no one does anything about it.
Blacks have unprecedented levels of success, and opportunities, in the US, backed up by affirmative action preferences in education and employment.
I’ve addressed this point adnossium with you and have yet to address it, so here we go one more time.

Just because a company has a box that can be ticked by having a token employee to satisfy a pie chart so they can say “we are an equal opportunity…” doesn’t mean that colored individuals have the same opportunity to get to that interview.

It’s also really patronizing.
Would it actually work? Probably not without other forms of dietary assistance and lifestyle changes, and it would be impossible to enforce.
Taking away the vending machine doesn’t make officer Freddy nicer. If you want to argue in good faith then discuss the point at hand: Coloured people are dying, they are angry and maybe instead of clutching your statues, you should be assisting with the above problem.

Or at the very, lest accept that the destruction of a few statues will allow the next generation to look more critically on who we idolize and by extension how we treat each other.
Cause frankly the one in the age of power isn’t.
 
Last edited:
Taking away the vending machine doesn’t make officer Freddy nicer.
What happens when officer Freddy is black? And his Commissioner is black? And their Mayor is black? Because black people are getting killed in black-LE-majority Dem-controlled cities at the highest rates right now. Turns out that much of this movement isn’t about police brutality, but about coercing whites to accept black criminality.
destruction of a few statues
That’s the thing, it’s more than destruction of a few statues. And pretending otherwise is counterproductive to honest discussion.

If anything, the destructive elements of the movement have created more racism and violent radicalism than before. Countless whites, Hispanics, and Asians are fed up with the MSM lies and are becoming less sympathetic for the plight of black people each day these protests continue.
 
What happens when officer Freddy is black? And his Commissioner is black? And their Mayor is black? Because black people are getting killed in black-LE-majority Dem-controlled cities at the highest rates right now.
Means the police are still too militarized even IF that assertion is true.
And since police respond too everything but white collar crime guess who disproportionately gets over policed?
It’s not suburbia.
Countless whites, Hispanics, and Asians are buying into the propaganda and are becoming less sympathetic for the plight of black people each day these protests continue.
Fixed it for you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top