P
Pope_Noah_I
Guest
Why?
Take this with a grain of salt, but this is what my opinion entails as it has been told to me by others. In parishes where the TLM and the NO are both celebrated, the NO must be the Mass said during the Easter Triduum, as only one Mass is said on those days and the NO is the Ordinary Form. Any parishes that celebrate the TLM exclusively may celebrate the TLM during the Triduum. TLM-only parishes have celebrated the TLM during the Triduum for quite a while I believe, and are allowed to continue to do so under Summorum Pontificum.Why?
Such as the Institute of Christ the King, Sovereign Priest.Unless the parish is part of one of the FSSP or similar licit organization
That is not true!But, during the tridium, as stated, no private masses may be offered at all, and under the MP, without the bishop’s (or priestly society’s superior’s) indult, ALL the EF masses are “private.”)
I’m not quite sure if that is correct. Parishes that solely celebrate the TLM, or do so a majority of the time, may celebrate the TLM on these days. However if a parish only occasionaly celebrates the TLM, they must use the NO during the Triduum.That is not true!Now the MP does say if the EF is used, there has to be a OF Mass, so that pretty much excludes Holy Thursday, unless you have the permission of the bishop.
For Holy Thursday, there is only Mass possible. (except for the Cathedral). So the MP itself does not provide permission for that Mass to be celebrated using the EF. The local bishop may, however, provide permission.I’m not quite sure if that is correct. Parishes that solely celebrate the TLM, or do so a majority of the time, may celebrate the TLM on these days. However if a parish only occasionaly celebrates the TLM, they must use the NO during the Triduum.
I have heard many people say, including Priests, that the Holy Thursday Mass can be a TLM, if that parish always celebrates Mass that way (ie: FSSP, ICRSS, etc.)Yes, for Holy Thursday, there is only Mass possible. (except for the Cathedral). So the MP does not provide permission for that Mass to be celebrated using the EF. The local bishop may provide permission.
But there is no limit on using the 1962 Good Friday liturgy, as that is not a Mass.
Yes, those parishes have the bishop’s approvals to do so.I have heard many people say, including Priests, that the Holy Thursday Mass can be a TLM, if that parish always celebrates Mass that way (ie: FSSP, ICRSS, etc.)
I was under the impression that the MP was all about the Priests in this instance, and just like the rest of the year, a Bishop couldn’t deny a Priest saying the TLM.Yes, those parishes have the bishop’s approvals to do so.
I don’t disagree with that, all I’m saying is that the MP itself doesn’t give the permission to do so. It also says that a bishop may expand the permissions to what ever extent he want to![]()
This question was answered already by CA Apologists, and by EWTN’s council of theologians during public discussion aired live on TV.Why?
This is not so. The MP does not state this. A parish that regularly celebrates the Novus Ordo may in fact choose to use the 1962 Missal for the Holy Thursday, Good Friday Liturgy or the Easter Vigil. There is nothing in the MP that suggests that the parish MUST use the Novus Ordo during this time.Take this with a grain of salt, but this is what my opinion entails as it has been told to me by others. In parishes where the TLM and the NO are both celebrated, the NO must be the Mass said during the Easter Triduum, as only one Mass is said on those days and the NO is the Ordinary Form. Any parishes that celebrate the TLM exclusively may celebrate the TLM during the Triduum. TLM-only parishes have celebrated the TLM during the Triduum for quite a while I believe, and are allowed to continue to do so under Summorum Pontificum.
I do not agree. I know a few parishes that would like to add a “more sense of the sacred” at the most sacred time of the year that only the 1962 Missal can offer. They would like to use the 1962 Missal especially for the Easter Vigil.I agree with SF. That is what I gathered from my reading of the MP and from reading the interpretations of other bishops and priests.