J
JohnPaul
Guest
Since Catholics give Mary the title of Mother of God, why don’t they give her mother the title of 'Grandmother of God?
It was her cousin Elizabeth that called her this. We do not see anyone called the ‘grandmother of my Lord’ in scripture.Since Catholics give Mary the title of Mother of God, why don’t they give her mother the title of 'Grandmother of God?
I’ve always know her as Saint Anne, what about the other in-laws, Saint Joseph I mean, where would it end, I mean the “grandfather of God” ?Since Catholics give Mary the title of Mother of God, why don’t they give her mother the title of 'Grandmother of God?
The title ‘Mother of God’ was declared dogmatically at the Council of Ephesus primarily to clear up some controversies about the nature of Christ.Since Catholics give Mary the title of Mother of God, why don’t they give her mother the title of 'Grandmother of God?
I’m sorry, but Joseph was more than just the “titular” father. In taking Mary into his home, Joseph became the legal father of Jesus. Jesus’ role as Messiah would have been null and void among ancient Jews if this didn’t happen, for He could not claim the title “Son of David” if Joseph was not His adopted father.Since the child Jesus was of the Holy Spirit, and placed, by Divine Will and Mary’s “Fiat” in her womb, no one is considered a maternal grandmother. Likewise, Joseph is never considered the true “father” of Christ, even though that is exactly how he functioned on earth. Mary certainly had a mother, and Joseph acted as father, but their roles were functional, rather than titular in nature.
Christ’s peace.
I don’t think “Mother of God” is an inaccurate translation of Theotokos. It may not be literal, but it is accurate. Nestorius would not allow that the Virgin Mary was the mother of God. He would allow that she was the mother of the Christ only. “The Mother of God” goes to the very heart of the Nestorian Heresy, and that is what the council of Ephesus condemned. So therefore “Mother of God” is the most accurate English translation of the greek Theotokos, and that is why we use it.The term Mother of God was an inaccurate translation of the Greek term THEOTOKOS into Western languages. In Greek, Theotokos Maria does not mean “Mary, the Mother of God”, but “Mary, the God-bearer”. However, the Mother of God can be used as an honorary title while addressing Mary since bearing and motherhood are linguistically and indispensably associated.
Thus, we cannot claim anyone to be the grandmother (Anna) of God, cousin (John the Baptist) of God, or even ancestor (Abraham, David) of God because only Mary was involved in the act of bearing (giving human body to) God the Son on earth.
Nevertheless, Nestorius was Greek, and the term he objected to was Theotokos (God-bearer), not “Mother of God”. Nestorius wanted to replace the very word Theotokos (God-bearer) with Christotokos (Christ-bearer) since he believed and contended that Mary bore only Christ, not the eternal Logos, the second divine person.I don’t think “Mother of God” is an inaccurate translation of Theotokos. It may not be literal, but it is accurate. Nestorius would not allow that the Virgin Mary was the mother of God. He would allow that she was the mother of the Christ only. “The Mother of God” goes to the very heart of the Nestorian Heresy, and that is what the council of Ephesus condemned. So therefore “Mother of God” is the most accurate English translation of the greek Theotokos, and that is why we use it.![]()
Because it would do nothing to further help us grasp the Incarnation.Since Catholics give Mary the title of Mother of God, why don’t they give her mother the title of 'Grandmother of God?
I was trying, poorly again, to say Joseph was not strictly a titular father, but also a physically functioning father, for Christ’s good, and the benefit of the eyes that watched. But, that also fanned the flames of doubt about Christ’s identity:I’m sorry, but Joseph was more than just the “titular” father. In taking Mary into his home, Joseph became the legal father of Jesus. Jesus’ role as Messiah would have been null and void among ancient Jews if this didn’t happen, for He could not claim the title “Son of David” if Joseph was not His adopted father.