B
berk60
Guest
Both…sometimes, there is a feeling of deep shame and humility of our own unworthiness,a nd sinfulness…that sometimes, we can humbly choose to go through Mary, or any saint for that matter.
Both…sometimes, there is a feeling of deep shame and humility of our own unworthiness,a nd sinfulness…that sometimes, we can humbly choose to go through Mary, or any saint for that matter.
No, I did not miss your point, I was pointing out another dimention, that Cornelius was acting in humility, because he knew Peter to be a holy man…and from Jesus…he was not intending to worship him…as you seem to imply.
Very pious work, however…This is proving difficult- I imply that even though Cornelius was not trying to worship Peter, he is rebuked by Peter for offering himself kneeling before Peter, a man.
Another quote from Liguori (saint and doctor of the RCC):
“At the command of Mary all obey, even God. She is omnipotent, for the queen, according to all laws, enjoys the same privileges as the king; and since the son’s power also belongs to the mother, this Mother is made omnipotent by an omnipotent Son. Therefore, to use the words of St. Antonine, God has put the whole Church not only under the patronage, but even under the power and authority, of Mary.”
Since this is by far his most famous work and the RCC has endorsed him as doctor of the Church, we can only suppose that his Marian beliefs had a high level of endorsement at the time. They speak for themselves, really. “The Glories of Mary” is found easily online.
If we are praying to the Saints then they are not dead, but very much alive in Heaven!
That is not what I am asking…what was God’s point in making them go through Job?
How about those in heaven…do you think they are dead or alive?
Those in heaven…are they dead or alive?he was not a dead person whom we are not suppose to contact.
Another of your misconceptions. Contacting the dead for something else other than intercessions is necromancy.Look into God’s word about contacting dead people and it seems He is not a fan of that sort of stuff
The use of relics have OT/Jewish roots…calledtocommunion.com/2012/08/relics-saints-and-the-assumption-of-mary/
It was actually the pagans who had qualms as you have. From the article:
The first real blow to this interpretation came when I read Peter Brown’s book, The Cult of Saints: Its Rise and Function in Latin Christianity.
Brown challenged my view that the place of saints and relics in the church was a mere holdover from paganism, and that the practice was somehow peripheral to true Christianity. Instead, Brown painted a picture of ancient Christianity and paganism in which relics were indispensable to the former, and repulsive to the latter. Far from a holdover from paganism, the place of relics in the Church appeared as something intensely Jewish, Hebraic, and Old Testament. Pagans, like Julian-the-Apostate, found the practice revolting and legislated against it. (Paganism, with its notions of ritual purity, had strictly delimited the realm of divine worship and neatly separated it from the realm of corpses and the dead.)
pablope;10701195:
, really. “The Glories of Mary” is found easily online.This is proving difficult- I imply that even though Cornelius was not trying to worship Peter, he is rebuked by Peter for offering himself kneeling before Peter, a man.
Another quote from Liguori (saint and doctor of the RCC):
“At the command of Mary all obey, even God. She is omnipotent, for the queen, according to all laws, enjoys the same privileges as the king; and since the son’s power also belongs to the mother, this Mother is made omnipotent by an omnipotent Son. Therefore, to use the words of St. Antonine, God has put the whole Church not only under the patronage, but even under the power and authority, of Mary.”
Since this is by far his most famous work and the RCC has endorsed him as doctor of the Church, we can only suppose that his Marian beliefs had a high level of endorsement at the time. They speak for themselves
Which is? Which fuels your biases and misconceptions? You seem to have a nuanced anger towards Ligouri’s writings?
Indifferently;10701407:
There is no anger here. But Liguori’s book is much better read as popular fiction and mythology (including as it does various apparent appearances of the Blessed Virgin, amongst other things) but as a serious manual of devotion, I suspect it is rather dangerous to the uninstructed mind, much as the use of the phrase “Our Lady”, not found in Scripture, which, even without formal endorsement, can create a folk religion which equates Mary with the all-too-similar-sounding Our Lord.Which is? Which fuels your biases and misconceptions? You seem to have a nuanced anger towards Ligouri’s writings?
And like you basically said: the CC would consider the worshipping of anyone other than God, outright heresy/apostasy.You have obviously missed my point. Cornelius was humbling himself before Peter by kneeling at his feet, and Peter rebuked him fiercely, saying that he too was a man. Cornelius was not worshipping the Apostle as God, and yet, he was rebuked.
“No one can enter Heaven unless by Mary, as though through a door.”
So says late Medieval writer Bonaventure, enthusiastically quoted by Alphonsus Liguori, later declared doctor of the Church by the Roman Catholic hierarchy.
pablope;10702246:
Appreciate your points but remember both the Anglican and Lutheran traditions refer to ‘Our Lady’ and name their churches after her.There is no anger here. But Liguori’s book is much better read as popular fiction and mythology (including as it does various apparent appearances of the Blessed Virgin, amongst other things) but as a serious manual of devotion, I suspect it is rather dangerous to the uninstructed mind, much as the use of the phrase “Our Lady”, not found in Scripture, which, even without formal endorsement, can create a folk religion which equates Mary with the all-too-similar-sounding Our Lord.
Indifferently;10702313:
We do indeed name our churches after her. But our official liturgical materials use no such phrase. The churches are usually called St Mary the Virgin - nothing controversial about that.Appreciate your points but remember both the Anglican and Lutheran traditions refer to ‘Our Lady’ and name their churches after her.
I get that all the time. Here is what I say. Oh, Did you not hear about Jesus Christ! He rose from the dead, He took away death. There is no more death.I had a conversation the other day on this topic so I thought I would present it to the forum. A Protestant friend of mine has prayer groups where they pray for others and ask for prayers in return.
I presented the question …If we can ask one another to pray for us, why can’t we ask the Mother of God and the Saints to do the same?
Her reply was that they are dead and do not pray for us and asking them to do so goes against Scripture.
Your thoughts?
EvangelCatholic;10702714:
We do indeed name our churches after her. But our official liturgical materials use no such phrase. The churches are usually called St Mary the Virgin - nothing controversial about that.**Appreciate your points but remember both the Anglican and Lutheran traditions refer to ‘Our Lady’ and name their churches after her.
**
Would you consider the appellation - our lady- controversial? Some protestants would consider calling our blessed mother Mary a virgin, somewhat controversial, since they do not believe that Mary remained a virgin. Different strokes for different folks I suppose…![]()
But where does that say that we can’t ask for the prayers of the Saints?I pray directly to God without the intercession of saints since Jesus is our High Priest. He can sympathize with our temptations and needs because He was tempted in all ways so He knows what it’s like. I come directly to Jesus because that is where to obtain the grace. Is that not allowed for the Catholic to come this way for the dispensing grace? Or does it have to come through Mary and saint?
I find in Hebrews 4:14-16, "Seeing then that we have a great High Priest who has passed through the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our confession. For we do not have a High Priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but was in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin. Let us therefore come boldly to the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy and find grace to help in time of need.
I ran into this already.I had a conversation the other day on this topic so I thought I would present it to the forum. A Protestant friend of mine has prayer groups where they pray for others and ask for prayers in return.
I presented the question …If we can ask one another to pray for us, why can’t we ask the Mother of God and the Saints to do the same?
Her reply was that they are dead and do not pray for us and asking them to do so goes against Scripture.
Your thoughts?
pablope;10702246:
But that is why we have the Church to go to when we are in doubt not a book.There is no anger here. But Liguori’s book is much better read as popular fiction and mythology (including as it does various apparent appearances of the Blessed Virgin, amongst other things) but as a serious manual of devotion, I suspect it is rather dangerous to the uninstructed mind, much as the use of the phrase “Our Lady”, not found in Scripture, which, even without formal endorsement, can create a folk religion which equates Mary with the all-too-similar-sounding Our Lord.
The Church is quite clear about Our Lady and what she is and is not to the Church.
And as far as Our Lady not being found in scripture means nothing. The Holy Trinity is also not found in scripure. But not being found in scripture, does not mean it is not so.
Indifferently;10702313:
Exactly.But that is why we have the Church to go to when we are in doubt not a book.
The Church is quite clear about Our Lady and what she is and is not to the Church.
And as far as Our Lady not being found in scripture means nothing. The Holy Trinity is also not found in scripure. But not being found in scripture, does not mean it is not so.Sola scriptura is found nowhere in the bible either, and yet it is embraced by so many non-Catholics. Most non-Catholics believe in original sin and yet those two words, together, can be found nowhere is the Bible. At the same time they reject the Immaculate Conception based on the fact that those two words can be found nowhere in the NT. Strange…
One thing is for sure, everyone in heaven is a saint and perfectly conformed to God’s will and therefore anything is possible for those saints. I am sure that all prayer is directed by God, and for God nothing is impossible.So how does one get the attention of a particular saint? Do I need an icon, or can I just think or call out his/her name and ask for his/her prayer to God?
Do they hear our thoughts only when praying to them or do they know our ordinary thoughts as well?
I don’t believe anyone can give you a clear answer on that. Personally, I think intercession/communication is all done via the Holy Spirit who intercedes for us on our behalf because we know not how to pray. Therefore, if our minds and hearts are thinking or asking a particular saint to pray for or with us, and this is a valid way to pray, then I think it safe to say that it would be done via the Holy Spirit in concert with that particular saint.So how does one get the attention of a particular saint? Do I need an icon, or can I just think or call out his/her name and ask for his/her prayer to God?
Do they hear our thoughts only when praying to them or do they know our ordinary thoughts as well?