Why "practice" religion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PathDiagnosis
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Of course you don’t need religion to be* moral.* I daresay there are some atheists (esp. some on this forum) that I’d rather have my back than some Christians I’ve been in dialogue with (esp. some on this forum.)

However, you do need religion to be* saintly*. In the way that St. Maximilian Kolbe was saintly.

No atheist in history has ever done anything as heroic and lovely and moving and life-giving as that which this Catholic priest did in Nazi Germany. And he wouldn’t (and couldn’t) have done it except for his religion.
True. Religion can motivate people to do things like that. Good.

It is still possible that religion is a human invention (see what I have been suggesting,etc) I WANT to be Catholic if both Theism and Catholicism are as true as 1+1=2.

I might be wrong. We all might be wrong.
 
I might be wrong. We all might be wrong.
Of course. But if you apply the same criterion of assurance for you to become a Believer to any, say, romantic relationship, you’ll never find a lover. :nope:

If you’re worried that you might be wrong about dating, or, as it applies in this context, courting God, and won’t step out until you can be 100% certain, then you can be assured of one thing: loneliness.
 
Who is stronger? The Nazi atheist who killed Maximilian Kolbe, or the brave man who stepped forward to die in place of a terrified man who had a family to live for (the same Maximilian Kolbe).

The Nazi atheist certainly looks stronger - after all, he killed a man, and he didn’t care which man he killed. But the world remembers the bravery of Maximilian Kolbe, and nobody ever remembers that Nazi atheist’s name.
*

This makes no sense whatsoever. It takes greater courage to be a moral person and believe in God than it does to wish-wash your way through life following every trend that comes along*.
What I meant was this:

What if this “need/thirst for God” is just an imagined basic human need? I’m afraid that if I return to religion, turning to God will be some sort of weakness? Am I just repressing spirituality?
 
What if this “need/thirst for God” is just an imagined basic human need?
I’ve read through this entire thread, and I know I’m jumping into the game late here, but this question really struck me. I would like to ask you one of my own: Do you really think that this need for God is an imagined need?

I ask that because it my opinion that this thirst for the Divine is a huge part of what drives humanity. Nothing else explains our need to feel significant, to have purpose, to leave a legacy. Nothing else explains our desire to be saved, to be loved and to know a Hero. Atheistic, evolutionary naturalism cannot account for any of these things - things that we all possess deep within.

Why else should we rail at the Problem of Pain which has brought you up short? We know that this world isn’t working the way it was meant to. We ache for God to fix it all. We desire so much more than this. I am thankful that I know the Lord and know that one day it will be set to rights. Until then, I do what I can, motivated by His gracious love, to alleviate suffering as I am given opportunity.

As one who has come close to suicide, I know no other answer than God. It is my sincere hope that you return to His embrace, realizing that it is He who sets the rules. He has done everything to show or prove His love to you, my friend.

Peace.
 
I’ve read through this entire thread, and I know I’m jumping into the game late here, but this question really struck me. I would like to ask you one of my own: Do you really think that this need for God is an imagined need?

I ask that because it my opinion that this thirst for the Divine is a huge part of what drives humanity. Nothing else explains our need to feel significant, to have purpose, to leave a legacy. Nothing else explains our desire to be saved, to be loved and to know a Hero. Atheistic, evolutionary naturalism cannot account for any of these things - things that we all possess deep within.

Why else should we rail at the Problem of Pain which has brought you up short? We know that this world isn’t working the way it was meant to. We ache for God to fix it all. We desire so much more than this. I am thankful that I know the Lord and know that one day it will be set to rights. Until then, I do what I can, motivated by His gracious love, to alleviate suffering as I am given opportunity.

As one who has come close to suicide, I know no other answer than God. It is my sincere hope that you return to His embrace, realizing that it is He who sets the rules. He has done everything to show or prove His love to you, my friend.

Peace.

Thank you for your response. I also once came close to suicide when I was rejected by all M.D. programs I applied to. It’s very competitive no matter how high grades and test scores are. I am working in a position that is one step below the type of diagnostic specialist I would rather be and will will probably start medical school at age 30-31 but oh well. I’m glad you are still here:)🙂

I am not sure if it is an imagined need or not. Your response is based much on emotions, feelings, “God shaped hole”, etc. I know we experience realities external to the material world: love, romance, enjoyment of music/nature, etc. Right now, I think I just have a thirst to be correct. Non-religion or religion, and if religion, which one?).

You are right, the world isn’t the way we want it. Things aren’t working the way we want them to. You wrote “we ache for God to fix it all”. This is where I’m afraid all religion is a form of escapism. Just because we want it to be true doesn’t make it true. Maybe Theism has been around for all this time because of the desires/aches you mentioned?

Maybe humanity is escaping this possibly imagined need for the Divine/religion/God? People are becoming less religious, even religious ones. Examples: the whole "Christianity is a relationship not a religion (don’t here that much among Catholics), progressive Christianity, Christians that don’t go to church, etc, etc. Maybe all of this is just that continuation of human

The world sucks. If religion is just invented escapism, I would rather do without it. If not, I feel Catholicism is the best choice, but I could be wrong about that. If I embrace Theism and becoming Catholic I might be able to handle the thought of Catholicism being wrong due to a change of mental “frame of reference”.

I hope you can all see that I am not here to negatively criticize religion. I’m thinking about things I think every religious person should, and it seem like people driven enough to go on a internet forum do so. Kudos:thumbsup:

Question for you specifically:
You desire I return to God’s embrace. What would you think if I became Catholic and not your religion (Christian but not Catholic)? Would it bother you? Both are are different conclusions about God.

Peace and Happy Thanksgiving.
 

Thank you for your response. I also once came close to suicide when I was rejected by all M.D. programs I applied to. It’s very competitive no matter how high grades and test scores are. I am working in a position that is one step below the type of diagnostic specialist I would rather be and will will probably start medical school at age 30-31 but oh well. I’m glad you are still here:)🙂

I am not sure if it is an imagined need or not. Your response is based much on emotions, feelings, “God shaped hole”, etc. I know we experience realities external to the material world: love, romance, enjoyment of music/nature, etc. Right now, I think I just have a thirst to be correct. Non-religion or religion, and if religion, which one?).

You are right, the world isn’t the way we want it. Things aren’t working the way we want them to. You wrote “we ache for God to fix it all”. This is where I’m afraid all religion is a form of escapism. Just because we want it to be true doesn’t make it true. Maybe Theism has been around for all this time because of the desires/aches you mentioned?

Maybe humanity is escaping this possibly imagined need for the Divine/religion/God? People are becoming less religious, even religious ones. Examples: the whole "Christianity is a relationship not a religion (don’t here that much among Catholics), progressive Christianity, Christians that don’t go to church, etc, etc. Maybe all of this is just that continuation of what humans have always been doing and the existence of multiple religions (past and present) is evidence of that?

The world sucks. If religion is just invented escapism, I would rather do without it. If not, I feel Catholicism is the best choice, but I could be wrong about that. If I embrace Theism and becoming Catholic I might be able to handle the thought of Catholicism being wrong due to a change of mental “frame of reference”.

I hope you can all see that I am not here to negatively criticize religion. I’m thinking about things I think every religious person should, and it seem like people driven enough to go on a internet forum do so. Kudos:thumbsup:

Question for you specifically:
You desire I return to God’s embrace. What would you think if I became Catholic and not your religion (Christian but not Catholic)? Would it bother you? Both are are different conclusions about God.

Peace and Happy Thanksgiving.
 

Thank you for your response. I also once came close to suicide when I was rejected by all M.D. programs I applied to. It’s very competitive no matter how high grades and test scores are. I am working in a position that is one step below the type of diagnostic specialist I would rather be and will will probably start medical school at age 30-31 but oh well. I’m glad you are still here:)🙂

I am not sure if it is an imagined need or not. Your response is based much on emotions, feelings, “God shaped hole”, etc. I know we experience realities external to the material world: love, romance, enjoyment of music/nature, etc. Right now, I think I just have a thirst to be correct. Non-religion or religion, and if religion, which one?).

You are right, the world isn’t the way we want it. Things aren’t working the way we want them to. You wrote “we ache for God to fix it all”. This is where I’m afraid all religion is a form of escapism. Just because we want it to be true doesn’t make it true. Maybe Theism has been around for all this time because of the desires/aches you mentioned?

Maybe humanity is escaping this possibly imagined need for the Divine/religion/God? People are becoming less religious, even religious ones. Examples: the whole "Christianity is a relationship not a religion (don’t here that much among Catholics), progressive Christianity, Christians that don’t go to church, etc, etc. Maybe all of this is just that continuation of human

The world sucks. If religion is just invented escapism, I would rather do without it. If not, I feel Catholicism is the best choice, but I could be wrong about that. If I embrace Theism and becoming Catholic I might be able to handle the thought of Catholicism being wrong due to a change of mental “frame of reference”.

I hope you can all see that I am not here to negatively criticize religion. I’m thinking about things I think every religious person should, and it seem like people driven enough to go on a internet forum do so. Kudos:thumbsup:

Question for you specifically:
You desire I return to God’s embrace. What would you think if I became Catholic and not your religion (Christian but not Catholic)? Would it bother you? Both are are different conclusions about God.

Peace and Happy Thanksgiving.
I meant “maybe all of this is just a continuation of what humans have always been doing”.
 
Why practice religion?

Because Christ was crucified, died and by his own authority was resurrected.

Its the only thing that keeps me going while dealing with so many deaths, because for us life is Christ and death is gain.
 
Hello,

I am not here to start a flame war. I would like to know why some of you need to practice religion Even if there is a God, why do you need a relationship with him/her/it? Did it ever occur to you that you are Catholic or some other sort of Christian because you were born into it, or born into a relative state of luxury that allowed you to research Church history, etc?
**
Background on me:**

Former Catholic convert from Protestantism. I feel like I know much about Catholicism, or as much as possible. I am well versed with works by Scott Hahn, Catholic Answers, etc. I am familiar with early Church history: the Didache, Pliny the Younger, Ignatius , Polycarp, etc. I admire the historical continuity of the Catholic Church, objection to Sola Scriptura, etc.

In a Universe in which the Christian God is true and Christianity is true, I would ONLY be Catholic. Frankly, from a secular viewpoint, I believe Protestantism is in serious error. If Christ is truly God, the CATHOLIC CHURCH (and ~Orthodox) is the HOLY CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC ONE CHURCH.

Not that works matter much to Christ, but here is a picture of the type of Catholic I was:
*Preferred Tridentine Latin Mass, was member of FSSP parish.
*Prayed rosary
*Confession about once a month
*Wore fivefold scapular

Interested in learning from practitioners of religion. Basically, can you be happy without religion? Can you go without it? Can you be apathetic to all the “where do morals come from, etc”? Basically, what is wrong with living life with no religion?

I was raised Roman Catholic, became an Agnostic for maybe a year, then slowly became Pagan.

I never, ever, ever want to leave the Catholic Church again. I never, ever want to disobey God again.

I see the Catholic Church as the true Church of God, founded by Jesus Christ. I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that I am where I need to be now. The Church has a lot of rules, rules that come from God. I experienced a world full of people making up rules according to what they believed was moral. I don’t want to listen to PEOPLE. I want to listen to God. I am almost at the point of resentment towards everyone Atheist, Pagan or even Protestant that wants me to be anything but Catholic. In my eyes it makes them the same; bad influences that think they’re good.

Harsh but yeah. I only have one life to make the right decisions. I already wasted enough time with meddlers.
 
I was raised Roman Catholic, became an Agnostic for maybe a year, then slowly became Pagan.

I never, ever, ever want to leave the Catholic Church again. I never, ever want to disobey God again.

I see the Catholic Church as the true Church of God, founded by Jesus Christ. I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that I am where I need to be now. The Church has a lot of rules, rules that come from God. I experienced a world full of people making up rules according to what they believed was moral. I don’t want to listen to PEOPLE. I want to listen to God.** I am almost at the point of resentment towards everyone Atheist, Pagan or even Protestant that wants me to be anything but Catholic. ** In my eyes it makes them the same; bad influences that think they’re good.

Harsh but yeah. I only have one life to make the right decisions. I already wasted enough time with meddlers.
So you basically dislike almost everyone who is not Catholic? Your post sounds extremely dogmatic. If you read carefully you can see that I’m not trying to be a bad influence to anyone, I’m just trying to understand being religious.

Your response is a very “religious”.
Did you read anything past my first post where I am just expressing concern that if I return to Catholicism, it may just be another religion that humans made and is just surviving by natural selection?

You sound like you think anyone that is not Christian or simply non-religious/apathetic to religion is evil or out to get you. Do you absolutely need religion to tell you how to live a good life?

Your return to Catholicism might be due in part to mental compartmentalization-you were raised that way. I wasn’t. I can’t discern/judge your thought process. How were you able to research enough about Catholicism to return so quickly…how did you decide it was the true Church without seminary level knowledge of the faith?

Peace
 
What I meant was this:

What if this “need/thirst for God” is just an imagined basic human need? I’m afraid that if I return to religion, turning to God will be some sort of weakness? Am I just repressing spirituality?
Have you read CS Lewis’ Argument from Desire?

His premise is that every single desire that we have corresponds to an actual desire that exists. We desire food when we’re hungry–and food actually exists.

IOW, the things we desire like food, sex, friendship, knowledge can actually be satisfied with things that exist. Thus the innate desire for God means that there is indeed Someone who can fulfill this desire.
 
Have you read CS Lewis’ Argument from Desire?

His premise is that every single desire that we have corresponds to an actual desire that exists. We desire food when we’re hungry–and food actually exists.

IOW, the things we desire like food, sex, friendship, knowledge can actually be satisfied with things that exist. Thus the innate desire for God means that there is indeed Someone who can fulfill this desire.
I never read it but will consider it. CS Lewis wasn’t Catholic but oh well.

As hard as it is for some of you to believe, I feel like I do not have this “thirst for God” you speak of. I have to desire to do what is correct and am entertaining the thought of being religious.

It seems like hard times in life drive people to become religious. I might have hard times from time to time but would rather deal with problems in a realistic way. I tried praying and experiencing nothing “holy/magical”. Religious experience can be explained my psychology (compartmentalization, etc).
 
I never read it but will consider it. CS Lewis wasn’t Catholic but oh well.
All truth is Catholic truth, Path.

Not to mention that the site I provided is written by a Catholic philosopher, Peter Kreeft.
As hard as it is for some of you to believe, I feel like I do not have this “thirst for God” you speak of. I have to desire to do what is correct and am entertaining the thought of being religious.
Any thirst you have for truth, knowledge, goodness, beauty, love (and, of course you have those!) is a thirst for God.
It seems like hard times in life drive people to become religious. I might have hard times from time to time but would rather deal with problems in a realistic way. I tried praying and experiencing nothing “holy/magical”. Religious experience can be explained my psychology (compartmentalization, etc).
Well, I am blessed to say (noteworthy that this is Thanksgiving) that I have not been burdened with “hard times” and I am very religious.
 
All truth is Catholic truth, Path.

Not to mention that the site I provided is written by a Catholic philosopher, Peter Kreeft.

**
Any thirst you have for truth, knowledge, goodness, beauty, love (and, of course you have those!) is a thirst for God.

**

Well, I am blessed to say (noteworthy that this is Thanksgiving) that I have not been burdened with “hard times” and I am very religious.
Thank you. All of this sounds like what religion seems to be: verbosity/prose/poetic to give more meaning to life.

Could people be religious as a means to feel better about negative aspects of existence? Pandoras box and Eve eating the apple both explain all the evil in the world. As a nonreligious person I accept I was randomly born in a wealthy/affluent/comfortable environment. I see the suffering around me, do and have done (but I will not boast of my good works) things to alleviate suffering/poverty (while still very much enjoying luxuries and comforts, why not?). I don’t need to believe in a cause of suffering or hope in a paradise after I die, and I think this makes my life exiting: want to do something, want to love someone, do it now.

So no, I don’t have a thirst for god. You poetically added that when you said a desire for A B and C is the name as a desire for God. I have never seen religion defended without poetry/prose, etc.
 
Thank you. All of this sounds like what religion seems to be: verbosity/prose/poetic to give more meaning to life.
Yes, some religions exist to give meaning to life.

Some religions exist because they’re true.

Your job is to believe in something because it’s True, not because it makes you feel happy.

Heck, belief in Santa Claus can make you feel happy, but as it’s not true, sadly, if you live your life by that belief, you’ll never truly be happy.
Could people be religious as a means to feel better about negative aspects of existence? Pandoras box and Eve eating the apple both explain all the evil in the world.
Yep. See above.
As a nonreligious person I accept I was randomly born in a wealthy/affluent/comfortable environment. I see the suffering around me, do and have done (but I will not boast of my good works) things to alleviate suffering/poverty (while still very much enjoying luxuries and comforts, why not?). I don’t need to believe in a cause of suffering or hope in a paradise after I die
You don’t “need” to? Okay. But, again, you should only believe in something because it’s True, right? Not because it makes you happy.

The Emperor’s New Clothes folktale limns that quite trenchantly. He believed in something that made him happy, but, alas, the truth was he was parading around butt naked and appeared an imbecile for believing in something just because it made him happy.
I think this makes my life exiting: want to do something, want to love someone, do it now.
Except, you can look at society and see that this paradigm has failed miserably. No one who does whatever they want when they want is *ever *happy.

(BTW, did you mean “exciting” and not “exiting”?)
So no, I don’t have a thirst for god. You poetically added that when you said a desire for A B and C is the name as a desire for God.
What you desire that’s good and beautiful and true is a desire for God. 🤷
I have never seen religion defended without poetry/prose, etc.
Exactly. Poetry and prose are quite necessary and beautiful expressions of truth!
 
Yes, some religions exist to give meaning to life.

Some religions exist because they’re true.

Your job is to believe in something because it’s True, not because it makes you feel happy.

Heck, belief in Santa Claus can make you feel happy, but as it’s not true, sadly, if you live your life by that belief, you’ll never truly be happy.

Yep. See above.

You don’t “need” to? Okay. But, again, you should only believe in something because it’s True, right? Not because it makes you happy.

The Emperor’s New Clothes folktale limns that quite trenchantly. He believed in something that made him happy, but, alas, the truth was he was parading around butt naked and appeared an imbecile for believing in something just because it made him happy.

Except, you can look at society and see that this paradigm has failed miserably. No one who does whatever they want when they want is *ever *happy.

(BTW, did you mean “exciting” and not “exiting”?)

What you desire that’s good and beautiful and true is a desire for God. 🤷

Exactly. Poetry and prose are quite necessary and beautiful expressions of truth!
Yes. I thirst for what is true. I believe in being open minded about religion, but the following seems more true than religion to me, so far:

Theism/religion is a human invention and all current religions are surviving based on natural selection at a human level (see my previous comments about anthropology/history of religion).

I stepped back in the universe, per se. Imagine Earth as a pale blue dot in outer space. It seems improbable that any religion developed this late in human history is the absolute truth of the entire universe.

Evidence for Christianity? Yes, it exists. But, like I mentioned, it’s existence is proportional to everything else that evolved in humanity.

I can’t talk myself out of this position. The idea that it took until 33 AD (aprox.) in human history for the true religion to arrive (assuming Theism is true) doesn’t make sense to me. Religion might provide comforting to answers about what happens after death or why we suffer, but it’s religion, which so far seem like a human invention over and over again.

If there be some supreme being out there, so be it. However, religion is the reduction of that supreme being into extreme details: seven sacraments, etc, etc, etc.
Peace.
 
To me, the idea of God is like the possibility of life (in form of at least something akin to “civilization”) on other planets.

To me, religion is like saying life for sure exists on those planets and claiming they speak English, French, or Spanish etc. Too specific.

Does that analogy make sense? I hope.
 
To me, the idea of God is like the possibility of life (in form of at least something akin to “civilization”) on other planets.

To me, religion is like saying life for sure exists on those planets and claiming they speak English, French, or Spanish etc. Too specific.

Does that analogy make sense? I hope.
EXCELLENT analogy! 👍 So true!!!
 
Read your Bible. It did not take until 33 AD for either God or true religion to enter human history. He and it have been a part of human consciousness ever since the first man and woman were created. They didn’t come into the picture late at all.

The history of Christianity is a history of progressive revelation by God of Himself. Which makes sense.

A teacher imparting mathematical knowledge to a class of 5 year olds doesn’t start with complicated stuff like quadratic equations - they start with the basics, addition, subtraction and times tables.

So God started with the basics of His moral code with Adam and Eve - His existence, the existence of good and evil, the importance of heeding His warnings against evil and sin and its consequences. Then progressively, as humans became more intellectually capable, He added layers of the moral code. Not just more rules but more understanding of their purpose. Finally, the pinnacle of His revelation was Himself in the person of Christ Jesus, with His teachings about self-sacrifice, selfless love and service to others.
 
Read your Bible. It did not take until 33 AD for either God or true religion to enter human history. He and it have been a part of human consciousness ever since the first man and woman were created. They didn’t come into the picture late at all.

The history of Christianity is a history of progressive revelation by God of Himself. Which makes sense.

A teacher imparting mathematical knowledge to a class of 5 year olds doesn’t start with complicated stuff like quadratic equations - they start with the basics, addition, subtraction and times tables.

So God started with the basics of His moral code with Adam and Eve - His existence, the existence of good and evil, the importance of heeding His warnings against evil and sin and its consequences. Then progressively, as humans became more intellectually capable, He added layers of the moral code. Not just more rules but more understanding of their purpose. Finally, the pinnacle of His revelation was Himself in the person of Christ Jesus, with His teachings about self-sacrifice, selfless love and service to others.
Thank you. I will think about this. I get what you are saying: everything before Christ was preparation, etc. Another other religions peopled followed are/were false, etc.

So then, the truth is one of the following:

A.) All current religions, including Catholicism, are just a continuation of what humans have always been doing (see my previous posts).

B.) Catholicism is the final thing.

Thanks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top