J
jmj1984
Guest
So I was reading St Alphonsus Ligouri’s ‘The Glories of Mary’ and something struck me as I read it, if it is true that we receive all graces through Mary, that God never refuses anything that we ask of Mary etc… what then is the point of praying to the saints as well? Surely we would be better off simply praying to Our Lady whose prayers would be more efficacious and always heard?
In my own head I was able to think of several solutions to the ‘problem’:
i)That the difference between Our Lady and the Saints is one of degree, not of kind, that is that whilst our lady is co-redemptrix, ,mediatrix, dispensetrix etc… she is not the sole co-redemptrix, the sole Mediatrix, the sole dispensetrix, the saints also participate in this office although to a lesser degree. Regarding the issue of Our Lady being Mediatrix it occured to me that if we see God as a sea of graces, Mary is the link between that sea and an aquedact, the aquedact being the communion of saints. After all, we are all part of the mystical body of Christ and surely the graces of God flow through Mary then through the Church glorious before reaching us?
Support for the idea of the difference between Our Lady and the Saints being one of degree and not kind can be found that the church did not invent a third time to apply to our veneration to Mary, it merely added ‘hyper’ to ‘dulia’ that which we owe to the saints, meaning that hypedulia is merely a greater degree of dulia. Also there is the fact that Our Lady is a human being not a Goddess nor an angel, therefore the difference between her and the saints can only be one of degree not kind.
ii)That God has in his infinite wisdom preordained that we receive certain graces due to the intercession of particular saints, angels i.e The Archangels, our guardian angels and Our Lady. Our Lady’s will being perfectly conformed to God’s she will not therefore ask God for graces that he has preordained we should receive due to the intercession of another. We do however strictly speaking still receive them ‘through’ Mary as they flow from Christ (the head of the body) through Mary (the neck of the body) and thence through the Church glorious.
I should point out that I thought out these ideas because otherwise we are left with some serious problems, if Mary is the sole co-redemptrix, the sole mediatrix, the sole dispensetrix and if we receive graces through her to the exclusion of the rest of the saints then the communion of saints is torn asunder. It appears to become a cult of Mary and God rather than a communion of saints. Or worse we are led to the patent absurdity that we need an intercessor (a saint) with an intercessor (mary) with God, and this becomes frankly ridicalous.
I should point out before anyone gets scandalised that I do have a genuine devotion to Mary, I try to pray the Rosary, the Little office, the office of the Immaculate conception and other prayers. I do not dispute the teaching of the Church and submit myself to her judgement, I am merely curious as to whether this question has ever been dealt with and if so how.
In my own head I was able to think of several solutions to the ‘problem’:
i)That the difference between Our Lady and the Saints is one of degree, not of kind, that is that whilst our lady is co-redemptrix, ,mediatrix, dispensetrix etc… she is not the sole co-redemptrix, the sole Mediatrix, the sole dispensetrix, the saints also participate in this office although to a lesser degree. Regarding the issue of Our Lady being Mediatrix it occured to me that if we see God as a sea of graces, Mary is the link between that sea and an aquedact, the aquedact being the communion of saints. After all, we are all part of the mystical body of Christ and surely the graces of God flow through Mary then through the Church glorious before reaching us?
Support for the idea of the difference between Our Lady and the Saints being one of degree and not kind can be found that the church did not invent a third time to apply to our veneration to Mary, it merely added ‘hyper’ to ‘dulia’ that which we owe to the saints, meaning that hypedulia is merely a greater degree of dulia. Also there is the fact that Our Lady is a human being not a Goddess nor an angel, therefore the difference between her and the saints can only be one of degree not kind.
ii)That God has in his infinite wisdom preordained that we receive certain graces due to the intercession of particular saints, angels i.e The Archangels, our guardian angels and Our Lady. Our Lady’s will being perfectly conformed to God’s she will not therefore ask God for graces that he has preordained we should receive due to the intercession of another. We do however strictly speaking still receive them ‘through’ Mary as they flow from Christ (the head of the body) through Mary (the neck of the body) and thence through the Church glorious.
I should point out that I thought out these ideas because otherwise we are left with some serious problems, if Mary is the sole co-redemptrix, the sole mediatrix, the sole dispensetrix and if we receive graces through her to the exclusion of the rest of the saints then the communion of saints is torn asunder. It appears to become a cult of Mary and God rather than a communion of saints. Or worse we are led to the patent absurdity that we need an intercessor (a saint) with an intercessor (mary) with God, and this becomes frankly ridicalous.
I should point out before anyone gets scandalised that I do have a genuine devotion to Mary, I try to pray the Rosary, the Little office, the office of the Immaculate conception and other prayers. I do not dispute the teaching of the Church and submit myself to her judgement, I am merely curious as to whether this question has ever been dealt with and if so how.
