J
JRKH
Guest
Armourbearer,
I agree with Hiskid that your post above is very well presented and shows much thoughtful consideration of both sides.
Just a couple of thoughts – I’ll just lift appropriate sections for the sake of space…
You said:
What I do find fault with is the belief that they are intended to intercede, to take action as an intercessor, an action that the Bible states as a two way street and by implication a position of close proximity, namely here on earth. “Confess your sins one to another, and pray one for another…
Then you go on to describe how “one to another” requires proximity. This I will grant you. However you do NOT mention “pray one for the other which does not require the same kind of proximity or even an close relationship. For instance…did you pray for the people affected by the earthquake in Japan? I’m sure you did. Yet you are not in proximity to them nor do you have a close relationship with them. Likewise we have a forum here for prayer requests. We don’t know each other and are spread around the world but we offer prayers even though we are not in “proximity” or have a relationship of “earned trust and a fulfilled obligation”…
So – We don’t confess our sings to Mary or a saint which I will grant, does require proximity but to ask them to pray – to intercede - for us, that does not require the same proximity.
You go on to mention St Paul in Philippians:
I agree with Hiskid that your post above is very well presented and shows much thoughtful consideration of both sides.
Just a couple of thoughts – I’ll just lift appropriate sections for the sake of space…
You said:
What I do find fault with is the belief that they are intended to intercede, to take action as an intercessor, an action that the Bible states as a two way street and by implication a position of close proximity, namely here on earth. “Confess your sins one to another, and pray one for another…
Then you go on to describe how “one to another” requires proximity. This I will grant you. However you do NOT mention “pray one for the other which does not require the same kind of proximity or even an close relationship. For instance…did you pray for the people affected by the earthquake in Japan? I’m sure you did. Yet you are not in proximity to them nor do you have a close relationship with them. Likewise we have a forum here for prayer requests. We don’t know each other and are spread around the world but we offer prayers even though we are not in “proximity” or have a relationship of “earned trust and a fulfilled obligation”…
So – We don’t confess our sings to Mary or a saint which I will grant, does require proximity but to ask them to pray – to intercede - for us, that does not require the same proximity.
You go on to mention St Paul in Philippians:
None of these things are actions those who have died and moved on can any longer fulfill, if they could, there would be no reason for Paul to be torn in Philippians 1:20-26 in the choice between labour with the saints and “gain”, as he clearly was. He says:
“24Nevertheless to abide in the flesh is more needful for you.
25 And having this confidence, I know that I shall abide and continue with you all for your furtherance and joy of faith;”
There is a clear distinction between “in the flesh” and his “gain.” I believe he was torn because he knew his limits, he was worried about their strength and growth and that he could not do for them what it is that they would need from heaven. He could not strive with them; he could not help bear their burdens any longer.
I think that you will agree that, if you are physically with someone you are in a better position to help since you and they can talk directly and clearly. However, being physically removed from them does not mean you cannot still help. After all Paul wrote letters when he could not be there. We also know that Paul prayed for those distant from him because he said so in his letters.
So the point is that, yes, close physical proximity is beneficial, but it is not necessary for one to intercede on behalf of others.
Lastly I’d like to thank you for taking the time to consider this and to ask good questions and to respond with such a well thought out reply.
Peace
James
“24Nevertheless to abide in the flesh is more needful for you.
25 And having this confidence, I know that I shall abide and continue with you all for your furtherance and joy of faith;”
There is a clear distinction between “in the flesh” and his “gain.” I believe he was torn because he knew his limits, he was worried about their strength and growth and that he could not do for them what it is that they would need from heaven. He could not strive with them; he could not help bear their burdens any longer.
I think that you will agree that, if you are physically with someone you are in a better position to help since you and they can talk directly and clearly. However, being physically removed from them does not mean you cannot still help. After all Paul wrote letters when he could not be there. We also know that Paul prayed for those distant from him because he said so in his letters.
So the point is that, yes, close physical proximity is beneficial, but it is not necessary for one to intercede on behalf of others.
Lastly I’d like to thank you for taking the time to consider this and to ask good questions and to respond with such a well thought out reply.
Peace
James