E
E.E.N.S
Guest
Again I neither said nor implied any of the things you claim. I doubt anyone else reading this thread who agree with your BOGUS accusations. Please stop making up lies and claiming them as truth.yes you did. all of your denials are false.
No I didn’t…what denials??
by eens:
Before you accuse someone of being a liar, please educate yourself. Most Catholics ARE Latin Rite Catholics - this has nothing to do with whether or not the Mass is said in Latin.
- when you said that most catholics are latin rite catholics, you lied. most catholics hear mass in the vernacular.
No, I quoted it because it is what the Church teaches. I never said it was a requirement - in fact I stated previously that it was not a requirement! No false teaching, your claim that I am is calumny.
- when you quoted a text that said gregorian chant is supposed to be sung at mass on sunday you quoted it because that is your preference, but it is not a requirement. you are implying that since some document says gregorian chant is to be given pride of place that it means it is a requirement. and furthermore, according to you, most catholics are latin rite and therefore they are RIGHT. hence, another misrepresentation, misinterpretation and false teaching on your part.
Who have I been intimidating?? And again never did I state any absolute law, I have only been quoting the Church.
- you are intimidating posters into agreeing with you by insisting that your chosen quoted texts are absolute law, when they are in fact, not binding.
NOT EVEN CLOSE!! I never said anything of the sort, not by a long shot!
- your arguments have developed to the point that you are saying if the mass is not in latin and is not gregorian chant then it is not valid…it is pretty evident on this thread that you are trying to make people believe that your way is the right way and everyone else is wrong… when, in fact, you are wrong and putting forth false teaching.
Again, where are you getting this?? Are you okay with lying with such liberality?
- you are trying to legislate people’s musical preference to be solely gregorian chant within the confines of the latin mass by arguing with people who do not agree with your false interpretations, which are not binding, but you are making it sound like it is binding. you are trying to make them believe it is binding so that you can have your way, which is that, all masses must absolutely be celebrated in latin and use gregorian chant to be considered valid.
Yes, it would be, though I haven’t heard anyone on this thread state anything of the sort.
- latin absolutism is a false theology.
7, jesus is jewish. not latin.
You are right for once! (Who said He was Latin??)