why st peter ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter michael777
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
ahimsaman72:
Luckily, there is room for difference in Judaism that circumvents part of the problems you find in Christianity which has dogmatized everything from what to wear to church and which pew you are supposed to sit in and what ice cream to have after services.
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

Apparently, someone does not like the Catholic Church very much.
 
Hildebrand said:
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

Apparently, someone does not like the Catholic Church very much.

It’s not that at all. More specifically, I was referring to my own former denomination. I contemplated converting to Catholicism some 9 months ago and respect Pope JP2 tremendously, along with some fine Catholics here. At this point, I don’t like any Christian denominations really, even though I grew up Southern Baptist. I have renounced all that and become a Noahide - which I believe is the only faith that makes sense and offers freedom.

Peace…
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
It’s not that at all. More specifically, I was referring to my own former denomination. I contemplated converting to Catholicism some 9 months ago and respect Pope JP2 tremendously, along with some fine Catholics here. At this point, I don’t like any Christian denominations really, even though I grew up Southern Baptist. I have renounced all that and become a Noahide - which I believe is the only faith that makes sense and offers freedom.

Peace…
Your journey is not finished yet, my friend!

smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/8/8_3_15.gif
 
40.png
michael777:
keys unlock things
Michael,

Throughout Holy Writ, whenever the Keys are given, it is a metaphor for giving of power and authority.

God Bless.
 
40.png
DianJo:
Please re-read the scripture verses, You seem to be missing it.
You asked about why the authority of Peter would be passed down to the next Bishop of Rome. It is because the position of Bishop is an office and the authority and power is passed on to the next person who holds the office.

What about the presidency? Does the next president elected not have the same power and authority as the one before him?
Keys and offices designate succession, along with this goes the power and authority of the office. That’s why the Pope has the authority - because of the office he holds.

Am I missing your question?
I don’t know what my question is I’m confused. I don’t believe the Pope has ultimate authority and I was trying to understand how he got that in catholic understanding, and other things about the catholic faith. maybe I have misconceptions about the faith but the more I learn about the Catholic the more I disagree with it.
 
40.png
SusanL:
Actually, there is biblical evidence to support this. Please consider starting another thread as it would be interesting to discuss this.

bjcros: I used to be Protestant up until 3 years ago and I had the very same objections. It is very hard to overcome the emotional part more than the intellectual part. I prayed to God to help me and then I did some research. I recommend reading anything by Scott Hahn when you feel ready to read. (He was a Protestant minister/Catholic convert who blew me away with how smart he was). It takes a lot of guts to look at this stuff and it doesn’t come easy.

Sue
I’m not looking to convert to catholicism b/c it doesn’t make any sense to me, and goes against some of my beliefs right now. I am trying to understand it b/c I have a catholic teacher at school and he isn’t good at defending his position at all. I want to know what arguments there are for the issues. So that I can see both sides.
 
Church Militant:
This is better stated. However, we both know that the NT records persecution by the Jews long before the sack of Jerusalem in 70AD and that we had ceased to be Jews as of the Jerusalem council in Acts 15. Right?

So you are saying that the Jews are no longer the olive tree that Jesus said we are grafted into? I think you have err’d in your interpretation of the Bible. If this was so then we are all lost since God Himself is the one who has grafted us onto that olive tree. The NT says so…

Oh…but you do. But that is another thread. Suffice it to say that the very nature of your “Protest-antism” shows that you have abandoned some of the very doctrines that even the original Protestants believed. Have alook at this thread about the Eucharist (so as to not hijack this thread):
I knew what you meant by the Eucharist, but I can just say that it is you that have the misconceptions lol. Where is that passage that Jesus say that we are grafted into an olive tree? Without looking back over the passage, I’m not sure but I think that the olive tree didn’t symbolize the Jews. Your right we ceased to be purely a jewish sect. Did the sanhedrin or other jewish council recognize the seperation?
 
Romans 11:16-21

The branch grafted to the olive tree is most certainly a reference to Jews and Christians.

Catholics have known this for thousands of years.
 
40.png
adnauseum:
Romans 11:16-21

The branch grafted to the olive tree is most certainly a reference to Jews and Christians.

Catholics have known this for thousands of years.
Alright so the Jews are going to Heaven just because they are jewish? I understand it as the jews who reject Jesus are the branches that were cut off. That is how I interpret the passage. I don’t care what race you are if you reject Jesus you are condemned to Hell. That is Biblical. Jesus said I am the Way the Truth and the Life no man commeth before the Father except through me.
 
40.png
MariaG:
Wow! That is a relief. There are only 4 different truths that the Holy Spirit has revealed. Much better than 30,000. Oh wait, that didn’t include Nazarene. 5. Evangelical. 6. Assembly of God. 7. Congregational. 8. Church of Christ. 9. Foursquare. 10. Vineyard. 11. Presbyterian. 12. Unity. 13.

Okay. Wow! what a relief. There are only 13 different truths that the “Holy Spirit” has revealed. Or did I forget one? 14 truths?

God Bless,
from a former Nazarene,
former Assembly of God
and former Evangelical

Maria
What many of our Protestant brethern fail to realize is that there cannot be as many as two competing truths. When as few as two churches have different teachings, one must be wrong.

They seek to find victories in two ways – first by saying, “It isn’t REALLY 33,000 separate churches, and there’s a BIG difference between 33,000 and 3.300 or 330.”

That, of course is nonsense – as stated above, a mere two would be enough to show the results of splitting from the one Church which has preserved the message for nearly 2,000 years.

The second argument they make is, “Well, there REALLY isn’t all that much difference between these churches.”

And the proper reply to that is, “There was enough difference to cause them to split. And there remains enough difference to keep them split.”
 
40.png
bjcros:
I’m not looking to convert to catholicism b/c it doesn’t make any sense to me, and goes against some of my beliefs right now. I am trying to understand it b/c I have a catholic teacher at school and he isn’t good at defending his position at all. I want to know what arguments there are for the issues. So that I can see both sides.
Ok. I understand. Have you checked out the tracts on Catholic.com? They would probably give you a much clearer understanding of what Catholics believe. It might be easier for you than reading some of our arguments.

This would give you information on the Church and the papacy:

catholic.com/library/church_papacy.asp

This might help you to understand why we believe in the Eucharist and other sacraments:

catholic.com/library/sacraments.asp

I fear that you will get more confused if you rely solely on the message boards. Some posters are very educated and some (not unlike myself) are still very much in the learning phase. (smile)

You can trust what you read in the tracts. They are easy to read and exactly what the church teaches.

Thank you for making yourself clear to me. I also appreciate your not bashing us. It is so refreshing to find someone who really is interested in hearing what the others have to say.

May God lead us both to truth.

Your sister in Christ,
Sue
 
vern humphrey:
What many of our Protestant brethern fail to realize is that there cannot be as many as two competing truths. When as few as two churches have different teachings, one must be wrong.
That’s the fallacy in your thinking. You automatically declare one true and the other false. This logic may work in mathematics and science, but is unreasonable in religion. You can’t put G-d under a microscope and verify His message. You can, however, dissect a frog and know his inmost parts using the scientific method. You can’t arrive at truth by scientific method in the spiritual/supernatural realm.

Every person has their understanding of “truth”. Just because you or Christ claims they have/are/know the truth doesn’t make it so. I can’t measure it or calculate it. I can’t dissect it and verify it by simple observation or scientific principles. The best humans have to go on is the logic and reasoning abilities given them in this life and the guide of their moral conscience. And, after that, simple faith comes into play. If I have used the capabilites given me by G-d to the best of my ability and still can’t find the “truth” (your definition of it), then the rest is not up to me - it is in the hands of the One who made me - the G-d of Israel, blessed be His name. I trust in His good judgement and not anyone else’s.

Peace…
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
That’s the fallacy in your thinking. You automatically declare one true and the other false. This logic may work in mathematics and science, but is unreasonable in religion…
I LOVE it! To maintain your postion, you have to reject basic logic and pretend that truth is somehow mutable and fungible.

I congratulate you. A person who could sincerly advance THAT argument could believe anything, anything at all.http://forums.catholic-questions.org/images/icons/icon12.gif
40.png
ahimsaman72:
You can’t put G-d under a microscope and verify His message. You can, however, dissect a frog and know his inmost parts using the scientific method. You can’t arrive at truth by scientific method in the spiritual/supernatural realm…
Who put God under a microscope?

Did you do it? If not you, then who?
40.png
ahimsaman72:
Every person has their understanding of “truth”. .
I agree with your comment that Every person has their understanding of “truth” That’s certainly true among Protestant denomiations – which is why there are so many Protestant denominations.

But “every person’s understanding” is not Christ’s message. Truth doesn’t mutate and modify itself from person to person. It remains constant. What changes occur, occur in the minds of men who have broken away from the Church.

Christ obvioulsy understood this would happen, if He didn’t take steps to prevent it. Those steps included establishing His Church, appointing Peter and his successors to lead it, and granting the Magisterium to the Church.
40.png
ahimsaman72:
Just because you or Christ claims they have/are/know the truth doesn’t make it so.
I belive if Christ claims He has/is/knows the truth, that DOES make it so.

I don’t see how you can disagree and claim to be a Christian.

I agree with your comment that Every person has their understanding of “truth” That’s certainly true among Protestant denomiations – which is why there are so many Protestant denominations.

But “every person’s understanding” is not Christ’s message. Truth doesn’t mutate and modify itself from person to person. It remains constant. What changes occur, occur in the minds of men who have broken away from the Church.
40.png
ahimsaman72:
I can’t measure it or calculate it. I can’t dissect it and verify it by simple observation or scientific principles. The best humans have to go on is the logic and reasoning abilities given them in this life and the guide of their moral conscience. .
Christ foresaw that – which is why He created His Church the way He did. His wisdom is evident when you see how His Church has taught a consistent message for 2,000 years, and the break-away churches keep splitting and re-splitting.
40.png
ahimsaman72:
And, after that, simple faith comes into play. If I have used the capabilites given me by G-d to the best of my ability and still can’t find the “truth” (your definition of it), then the rest is not up to me - it is in the hands of the One who made me - the G-d of Israel, blessed be His name. I trust in His good judgement and not anyone else’s.
Obviously you DON’T trust His good judgement – because you work very hard to circumvent the process He set up to keep His message pure.
 
vern humphrey:
I LOVE it! To maintain your postion, you have to reject basic logic and pretend that truth is somehow mutable and fungible.

I congratulate you. A person who could sincerly advance THAT argument could believe anything, anything at all.http://forums.catholic-questions.org/images/icons/icon12.gif
Basic logic we all use. The reasoning you are using to get to your religious conclusions is based on mathematical and scientific reasoning. My point is that natural and spiritual are two different realms of existence. You can’t use mathematical logic to arrive at the conclusion that G-d exists or that G-d has said, “X is the truth”. Faith comes in at some point.
Who put God under a microscope?

Did you do it? If not you, then who?
No one has done that to date, although scientific achievement is advancing every day. It’s physically impossible to put Him under a microscope as far as I know.
I agree with your comment that Every person has their understanding of “truth” That’s certainly true among Protestant denomiations – which is why there are so many Protestant denominations.

But “every person’s understanding” is not Christ’s message. Truth doesn’t mutate and modify itself from person to person. It remains constant. What changes occur, occur in the minds of men who have broken away from the Church.

Christ obvioulsy understood this would happen, if He didn’t take steps to prevent it. Those steps included establishing His Church, appointing Peter and his successors to lead it, and granting the Magisterium to the Church.
It is true of every human being on this planet. There’s not one Catholic that agrees with another on each and every issue. Some practice birth control, some don’t, etc. It’s not just a protestant thing. As I have already stated, every religion on earth is segmented - fractured. I see no difference in the world’s religions today. All claim infallible truth. All have “proofs”. All have what they believe is truth and work very hard to convince you of this.
I belive if Christ claims He has/is/knows the truth, that DOES make it so.

I don’t see how you can disagree and claim to be a Christian.
Just because you claim to be the President of the US doesn’t make it so, does it? It boils down to your BELIEF that Christ claimed what he did and that He is who He is. I don’t claim to be a Christian. Where do you get your ideas?
I agree with your comment that Every person has their understanding of “truth” That’s certainly true among Protestant denomiations – which is why there are so many Protestant denominations.

But “every person’s understanding” is not Christ’s message. Truth doesn’t mutate and modify itself from person to person. It remains constant. What changes occur, occur in the minds of men who have broken away from the Church.
Again, your version of truth is different than Mohammed’s and Buddha’s. So, why should your truth be followed any more than theirs?
Christ foresaw that – which is why He created His Church the way He did. His wisdom is evident when you see how His Church has taught a consistent message for 2,000 years, and the break-away churches keep splitting and re-splitting.

Obviously you DON’T trust His good judgement – because you work very hard to circumvent the process He set up to keep His message pure.
Obviously since I don’t prescribe to your views and religion you can do nothing else but cast doubt on mine and attempt to know what I think and how I feel. I’ve worked very hard to figure out this truth you are proclaiming, however I came to the conclusion that the Jews had it right all along and it is Christians that have circumvented G-d’s process.
 
All right. Here I go, walking where angels fear to tread. :rolleyes:

Wasn’t there a prediction in the Book of Isaiah about Jesus? It seems to me that there was a school that would only allow Old Testament scriptures to be read so not to offend the Jewish people. (Old Testament was accepted by both the Jews and the Christians).
When the scripture was read, a Jewish family objected because it sounded like the New Testament reading of Jesus. It wasn’t. It was Isaiah predicting the coming of Jesus.

I guess that I’m going to have to go and look it up. Ahimsaman72, have you ever heard about the scriptures from our Old Testament (your Torah, is it?–not sure of the proper name so please forgive me in advance) that described Jesus’ birth and death?

I know, I know. I have to go look it up.
 
40.png
SusanL:
All right. Here I go, walking where angels fear to tread. :rolleyes:

Wasn’t there a prediction in the Book of Isaiah about Jesus? It seems to me that there was a school that would only allow Old Testament scriptures to be read so not to offend the Jewish people. (Old Testament was accepted by both the Jews and the Christians).
When the scripture was read, a Jewish family objected because it sounded like the New Testament reading of Jesus. It wasn’t. It was Isaiah predicting the coming of Jesus.

I guess that I’m going to have to go and look it up. Ahimsaman72, have you ever heard about the scriptures from our Old Testament (your Torah, is it?–not sure of the proper name so please forgive me in advance) that described Jesus’ birth and death?

I know, I know. I have to go look it up.
Susan,
The predictions that Christians cite for reference to Jesus can all be refuted, even the Isaiah passage. I refer you to www.jewsforjudaism.org and click on the e-book referring to the messiah on that front page. There are plenty of resources that will help explain. Also, a site I often refer to is: www.jewfaq.org

Torah is a term used differently by different people. In its broad usage it refers to the Pentateuch, Writings and Prophets which are similar to the Protestant OT, not the Catholic OT. In its narrow usage it refers to the Pentateuch only (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy). The whole Jewish text is referred to as the Tanakh, which is comprised of Torah, Neviim and Ketuvim. Here is a link that briefly describes this: topicguide.com/Bible.html

I respect your gentle spirit and zeal for your faith, however it is a faith which I do not espouse. I have many wonderful Christian family members and friends whom I love very much. But, I must follow my own path in life as you must follow yours.

Peace…
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
Basic logic we all use. The reasoning you are using to get to your religious conclusions is based on mathematical and scientific reasoning. My point is that natural and spiritual are two different realms of existence. You can’t use mathematical logic to arrive at the conclusion that G-d exists or that G-d has said, “X is the truth”. Faith comes in at some point…
You’re creating a strawman argument. No one has said we can arrive at God with scientific methods. But logic holds, whether we discuss religion or politics. It is no accident that the great Christian teachers were also logicians.
40.png
ahimsaman72:
No one has done that to date, although scientific achievement is advancing every day. It’s physically impossible to put Him under a microscope as far as I know. …
Then why do you imply that someone IS putting God under a microscope?
40.png
ahimsaman72:
It is true of every human being on this planet. There’s not one Catholic that agrees with another on each and every issue. Some practice birth control, some don’t, etc…
That’s the Protestant Smokescreen. Catholics do not determine dogma by voting on it.

To say that some Catholics are poorly-educated in their religion, or are willfully resisting the teaching of the Church is one thing. To pretend that somehow invalidates Church teaching, or shows the Church’s teaching is not consistent is simply false.
40.png
ahimsaman72:
. It’s not just a protestant thing. As I have already stated, every religion on earth is segmented - fractured. I see no difference in the world’s religions today. All claim infallible truth. All have “proofs”. All have what they believe is truth and work very hard to convince you of this…
The sins or lack of knowledge of individual Catholics do not change Catholic dogma.
40.png
ahimsaman72:
.Just because you claim to be the President of the US doesn’t make it so, does it? …
When did I claim to be President of the United States?
40.png
ahimsaman72:
It boils down to your BELIEF that Christ claimed what he did and that He is who He is. I don’t claim to be a Christian. Where do you get your ideas? …
If you’re not a Christian, where do you get the authority to tell Christians what they believe?
40.png
ahimsaman72:
Again, your version of truth is different than Mohammed’s and Buddha’s. So, why should your truth be followed any more than theirs?..
I’m beginning to suspect you don’t know what Mohammed or Buddha taught.
40.png
ahimsaman72:
Obviously since I don’t prescribe to your views and religion you can do nothing else but cast doubt on mine and attempt to know what I think and how I feel. I’ve worked very hard to figure out this truth you are proclaiming, however I came to the conclusion that the Jews had it right all along and it is Christians that have circumvented G-d’s process.
So are you a Jew?

If not, why not?
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
There’s not one Catholic that agrees with another on each and every issue. Some practice birth control, some don’t, etc. It’s not just a protestant thing.
Greetings my friend,

The Catholic Church teaches a unified doctrine. I’ve said this so many times, but I’ll say it again. Men don’t corrupt doctrine. Men corrupt men. Why do you continue to insist that since some individual Catholics refuse to follow certain teachings of the bride of Christ (the Church), that it is the Church teaching this? You see many protestant churches actually teach pro-choice, birth control etc. from the pulpit!
40.png
ahimsaman72:
I don’t claim to be a Christian. Where do you get your ideas?
Correct me if I’m wrong but you were baptist, and then psuedo baptist buddhist and now you are noahist(sp?). You are searching my friend. Sometimes analyzing something to death can cause frustaration and confusion. Open your heart and let the grace of God lead you home. Ephphatha!

:blessyou:
 
vern humphrey:
You’re creating a strawman argument. No one has said we can arrive at God with scientific methods. But logic holds, whether we discuss religion or politics. It is no accident that the great Christian teachers were also logicians.

Then why do you imply that someone IS putting God under a microscope?

That’s the Protestant Smokescreen. Catholics do not determine dogma by voting on it.

To say that some Catholics are poorly-educated in their religion, or are willfully resisting the teaching of the Church is one thing. To pretend that somehow invalidates Church teaching, or shows the Church’s teaching is not consistent is simply false.

The sins or lack of knowledge of individual Catholics do not change Catholic dogma.

When did I claim to be President of the United States?
Just creating a bridge between your claim that Jesus is the truth and said, X, Y and Z and the fact that you could say the same thing and it wouldn’t change anything
If you’re not a Christian, where do you get the authority to tell Christians what they believe?
I was a Christian for 32 years and studied that faith extensively over time. I’m not obsessive compulsive about authority myself. Many get overly excited about that idea, but I do not.
I’m beginning to suspect you don’t know what Mohammed or Buddha taught.
And again you would be wrong partially. I know little of Mohammed and alot about Buddha. I studied Buddhism heavily and practiced it. Your supposed knowledge of me is incredibly arrogant. I have posted numerous times of Buddhist teaching and started a long thread about the teaching of Buddha, both of which you can easily look up.
So are you a Jew?

If not, why not?
I am not a Jew. I am a Noahide. The only way I could be one is to convert to Judaism. Non-Jews are discouraged from converting because of the complexity of the conversion. Instead of following the 7 Noahide laws, one must follow the 613 laws and be an observant Jew. You do the math. G-d has declared that the one who follows the 7 Noahide laws is righteous in G-d’s eyes, so why burden oneself with further laws?

G-d does not expect more from those who cannot give it. No matter how hard I try, I cannot change the fact that I am a Gentile born to Gentile parents and grew up in a Christian environment. G-d expects all mankind to follow at least the 7 laws of Noah and if one does, then one is righteous.

Peace…
 
40.png
bjcros:
if you reject Jesus you are condemned to Hell.
I know you love Jesus. So do I. And I would be ecstatic if the whole world loved Jesus! But we must be careful about stating who is condemned to hell. I know that Jesus says that no one comes to the Father except through Him, but we also must remember the verse about that plank in the eye thing. Catch my drift? 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top