Why Standing During the Eucharistic Prayer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter smndtupidisaftr
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
My parents’ parish (and my childhood parish) does not have kneelers, and there is not enough room between the rows of seats for people to easily kneel either. The people are friendly there but I do prefer to be able to kneel during the sections of the Liturgy of the Eucharist with ease.

That is why I’ve found a few local parishes close to my work I can go to that have pews with kneelers, and kneeling during certain sections of the Liturgy of the Eucharist is something I prefer now even if I did not grow up on it. Not all of parishes I’ve been to in my diocese have pews with kneelers or even seats that have kneelers you can pull out in front of you that are on the chair in front of you.
 
I’m glad this was brought up. This past Sunday while we were standing, my husband leaned over to me and quietly asked “Why are we standing?” to which I looked around and said “I don’t know”.

Most were standing, some were kneeling, some were sitting. I was quite confused.

I am one, however, who grew up with kneeling in prayer AFTER receiving the Eucharist, as my mother taught me.

So I googled, and this is what I found: You’ll notice it says “in your missalette”, which, ours at church does not state “sit, stand, kneel” as I remember the missalette’s when I was a child did.

I did just order a Daily Roman Missal ~ hopefully that will help clear up some of my confusion.

catholicliturgy.com/index.cfm/FuseAction/ArticleText/Index/6/SubIndex/94/ArticleIndex/18
 
So Cardinal Mahony wrote a letter directing us to do weird things at Mass, which of course would only apply within his Archdiocese. He is no longer Archbishop. Let’s tear up this “controversial” letter and end the controversy right now and get people back on track to proper attitudes in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament.

Unfortunately some misguided or uninformed priests are still having their congregations assume irreverent postures. Unfortunately again, they apparently have not consulted the one proper authority on this matter, the Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments.

If it did not come from that Vatican office, the letter is now completely irrelevant. In fact I’d say it’s an anachronism of an era which cannot pass too quickly.
I posted a link to the article in question. Why don’t you read it before you condemn it and its author? Why don’t you try what I did and use the Ctrl F function on words like “stand” and “altar” and “table”?

If you find something that’s really bizarre, quote it, and then state why it’s wrong. I don’t think you’ll find anything.
 
Note:** “Bishop”**. The Bishop has authority on matters of liturgy in your diocese, so if this directive is coming from the Bishop then you should follow it. If it is not, then you have more of an argument, but first, find out if is from the Bishop.:
The Bishop has SOME authority in the Liturgy, but most of the authority actually comes from Rome, specifically the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discpline of the Sacraments.

It is that Dicastery that has been charged by the Pope to develop and approve the Liturgy.
It is under that authority that the Liturgy and the primary rubrics recieve the force of law, and therefore, it is the rulings of that organization that we are to obey, under pain of disobedience.

We see this under Canon 16
Can. 16 §1. The legislator authentically interprets laws as does the one to whom the same legislator has entrusted the power of authentically interpreting.
§2. An authentic interpretation put forth in the form of law has the same force as the law itself and must be promulgated. If it only declares the words of the law which are certain in themselves, it is retroactive; if it restricts or extends the law, or if it explains a doubtful law, it is not retroactive.
The one who is the legislation of the liturgical law ( the CDWDS) is the authentic interpreator of the law, and it’s decisions have the force of law.

The liturgical law of the Church has granted certain control over rubrics to the local bishop. Those are clearly stated within the law itself ( such as the authority to mandate the posture of standing after the Agnus Dei until the personal reception of Holy Communion)

Other postures, such as the posture of kneeling or standing during reception of the Holy Conmuntion, reception of the Holy Communion on the tounge or in the hand, or of kneeling, standing or sitting after returning to the pew, the Holy See has delegated to the individual member of the faithful.

Thus, in those matters, the local bishop, the pastor or the minister of Holy Communion, is actually under obediece to us ( if we choose to recieve Holy Communion on our tounge or in our hands, the minsiter is obliged, under obediece, to comply)

That all goes back to Aquinas’ definition of the virtue of obedience, the conformation of the will of the subject to the will of the one who has authority.

Thus, if a bishop attempts to regulate in an area where the liturgical law has been set by Rome, the one to whom we conform our wills is the one with the actual authority, Rome

Pastor Aeternus- Vatican I
Wherefore we teach and declare that, by divine ordinance, the Roman Church possesses a pre-eminence of ordinary power over every other Church, and that this jurisdictional power of the Roman Pontiff is both episcopal and immediate. Both clergy and faithful, of whatever rite and dignity, both singly and collectively, are bound to submit to this power by the duty of hierarchical subordination and true obedience, and this not only in matters concerning faith and morals, but also in those which regard the discipline and government of the Church throughout the world.
Ergo, if Rome has set regulations, all Catholics, clergy and lay, of whatever digntiy, are bound out of obedience to obey and comply.
 
And, if it helps,

Here is the US bishops discussing the exact same issue during the development of the current General Instruction of the Roman Missal

adoremus.org/0703Kneel.html

We can see the response from Rome, that was subsequentally published in the US Bishops own liturgical newsletter
The BCL Newsletter continues: “In the implementation of the General Instruction of the Roman Missal, therefore, posture should not be regulated so rigidly as to forbid individual communicants from kneeling or sitting when returning from having received Holy Communion” (p. 26. emphasis added.)
So anyone ( clergy or lay) who attempts to regulate the liturgy in such a way as to forbid someone from kneeling or sitting after they return to their pew after Communion, is in violation of a specific Vatican directive.
 
It is wrong for the congregation to stand during the euchatistic prayer. You may feel though that it is better to act in unity with the congregation (though in all actuality in cases of liturgical abuse, the unity actually called for is unity with the Church as a whole). I would hardly think it a matter of wrong-doing in your case if you stand under such compulsion, though you might rather consider simply going to mass elsewhere.
Except when it’s not.

The universal norm is to kneel from the “Holy Holy” to the “Mystery of Faith”, and stand the rest of the Eucharistic Prayer. That’s what we do in Canada, as our Bishops have instructed us. There’s nothing wrong about that. In the US (and in Vancouver) they kneel till the Great Amen because that’s their custom. It’s not wrong to stand during certain parts of the EP depending on the local custom, but it’s always kneeling till the “Mystery of Faith”.
 
Except when it’s not.

The universal norm is to kneel from the “Holy Holy” to the “Mystery of Faith”, and stand the rest of the Eucharistic Prayer. That’s what we do in Canada, as our Bishops have instructed us. There’s nothing wrong about that. In the US (and in Vancouver) they kneel till the Great Amen because that’s their custom. It’s not wrong to stand during certain parts of the EP depending on the local custom, but it’s always kneeling till the “Mystery of Faith”.
Though in the US it would be wrong, but it’s irrelevant in this case anyway because there was no kneeling throughout the entire Eucharistic prayer, even the consecration.
 
Except when it’s not.

The universal norm is to kneel from the “Holy Holy” to the “Mystery of Faith”, and stand the rest of the Eucharistic Prayer. That’s what we do in Canada, as our Bishops have instructed us. There’s nothing wrong about that. In the US (and in Vancouver) they kneel till the Great Amen because that’s their custom. It’s not wrong to stand during certain parts of the EP depending on the local custom, but it’s always kneeling till the “Mystery of Faith”.
In the US, it’s more than a “custom”; it’s an adaptation of the GIRM that was approved by the Vatican.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top