T
twf
Guest
The first wave of Puritans were escaping Anglicanism… not Catholicism.
I would be willing to do so but I don’t know if this would violate what’s acceptable here. I remember getting cautioned years ago at another site for mentioning a different one. How would I go about getting the OK here?Would you mind sharing what site that is? I like to defend against anti Catholics.
The rules here are that you can’t link to a particular thread on another site for the purpose of rallying the troops or “circling the wagons”, and ganging up on other people at another site. But I don’t think sharing sites has been frowned upon, as long as it is relevant to the topic or post to which you are responding.I would be willing to do so but I don’t know if this would violate what’s acceptable here. I remember getting cautioned years ago at another site for mentioning a different one. How would I go about getting the OK here?
Yes, but they believed that the Anglicans had not sufficiently Reformed from Catholicism. The Church of England, in the beginning, just took over the role and practice from Rome. People who had divergent beliefs were still fined, imprisoned, or put to death. The Anglican practice of catholicism had no room for the Puritans.The first wave of Puritans were escaping Anglicanism… not Catholicism.
How might one do this?follow my posting history
It’s ReligiousForums.com, and you’ll see me over there with my Pepe LePew avatar. Let me know when you get there.Would you mind sharing what site that is? I like to defend against anti Catholics.
Thanks so much for the clarification, and take care.The rules here are that you can’t link to a particular thread on another site for the purpose of rallying the troops or “circling the wagons”, and ganging up on other people at another site. But I don’t think sharing sites has been frowned upon, as long as it is relevant to the topic or post to which you are responding.