H
Hisalone
Guest
Everyone of its books (with the possible exception of one) was written by a Jew.
St. Luke may not have been a Jew.Everyone of its books (with the possible exception of one) was written by a Jew.
Are you saying the the NT books are Jewish in content and nature?The bible is Gods book to mankind entrusted to the Jews and followed by men of good will worldwide despite their religious affiliation.
Catholics have tried to replace Jews as Gods chosen people—heresy.
Now they want to claim the Jewish book as their own. Pretty petty behavious in my opinion.
Not a rabbinic Jew.Everyone of its books (with the possible exception of one) was written by a Jew.
End of Matthew.Are you saying the the NT books are Jewish in content and nature?
Show me where Jesus said to write it down and pass it on to mankind.
Did he say “write” or “teach.” Jesus wanted it passed face to face, by oral tradition and example of action.End of Matthew.
Btw, the Talmud wasn’t supposed to be written down either. That’s why it’s called the ORAL law.
Uhm, actually…Christians are God’s chosen people. The Israelites were the chosen nation of God under the Old Covenant. His chosen are those who have accepted the full revelation of Himself in the Person of His Son. Those who deny the Christ are most assuredly not a chosen people.The bible is Gods book to mankind entrusted to the Jews and followed by men of good will worldwide despite their religious affiliation.
Catholics have tried to replace Jews as Gods chosen people—heresy.
Now they want to claim the Jewish book as their own. Pretty petty behavious in my opinion.
The Christian Bible in print is actually a diverse collection of individual books which were listed,compiled,and ordered into various canons by the Church Fathers. In a short explanation, the Bible is a work and product of the historical Church.Everyone of its books (with the possible exception of one) was written by a Jew.
And so they did. That no more prevents writting it down than it stopped the Jews from writting down the Talmud.Did he say “write” or “teach.” Jesus wanted it passed face to face, by oral tradition and example of action.
Be careful my friend, this sounds like replacement theology. God’s covenant with Abraham was unconditional. There is indeed a special role for Israel in God’s salvation plan. The Jews were and are God’s chosen people - he chose (not by merit, by grace) to use them to teach the world about Him and the difference between holy and unholy and about the coming of the Messiah. While are you correct that God extended his grace to all (jew and gentile) who come to believe in Him through Christ, He did not abandon his covenant with Israel. This is what Romans 11 is telling us - after the full alotment of Gentile come in “all Israel will be saved” (not all Jews of all time, as some believe, but I believe he will cause that remnant to “see” and come to faith, which is consistent with zechariah when it says in the end times they will mourn for the one whom they have pierced and call on the name of the law).Uhm, actually…Christians are God’s chosen people. The Israelites were the chosen nation of God under the Old Covenant. His chosen are those who have accepted the full revelation of Himself in the Person of His Son. Those who deny the Christ are most assuredly not a chosen people.
Which, btw, includes a large number of those of the race of the Hebrews, the Children of Israel, the seed of Abraham.The Christian Bible in print is actually a diverse collection of indiviudal books which were listed,compiled,and ordered into various canons by the Church Fathers. In a short explanation, the Bible is a work and product of the historical Church.
Do you think maybe that is why I said with the possible exception.St. Luke may not have been a Jew.
The New Testement was written by members of the early Church, and they were born Jews and born again Catholics.
Most assuredly it is.Are you saying the the NT books are Jewish in content and nature?
Show me where Jesus said to write it down and pass it on to mankind.
Well first things first.Everyone of its books (with the possible exception of one) was written by a Jew.
You now have some company, Marco. I am the other crazy person in the room.I am not following this thread. What is the logic here? If the writers of the New Testament were born Jews…and then became Christians and wrote the New Testament…the Bible cannot therefore be Catholic. I may be the crazy person in this room, but I am not sure where any of that even makes any sense at all to respond to.
The bible is a Jewish book.So you’re saying that the Bible is a Jewish text, that God ‘willed’ it to Christians later and that you’re going to ignore the fact that at the time the Holy Spirit led humanity into canonizing the books, that those whom He led were all Catholic Christians, and that for some 600 plus years all who read and heard it were Catholic Christians, for another 600 years they were all Catholic Christians and Orthodox Christians, and that only some 500 years ago or so, certain people protesting that Catholic and Orthodox Christian faith took out a few books and have spent the last 500 years claiming not only that their personal and non-authoritative interpretations are the ‘real ones’ but that each of their hundreds of churches is the ‘real church’, the real ‘bible-believing Christians’–and all this time, the book that they claim is the ‘only’ authority isn’t even a Christian book???![]()