Why the Left Likes Islam.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Charlemagne_III
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Can someone explain to me why the political left slams Christianity every chance it gets and likes Islam so much when Islam really stands for everything the Left abhors?
protestant Christians tends to vote republican: even Catholics are voting for other parties due too the abortion issue and first generation immigrants tend to vote democrat.

if you are catholic and voted for a pro abortion candidate, why are you supporting abortion.
 
Last time I’m retyping this.

You, a Catholic are commanded by the Bible to “judge not”.

Christianity has it’s radicals too.

Islam and Christianity are actually similar.
You didn’t need to retype it, I got it the first time. And I replied, “I don’t think you understand what Jesus meant when he said, “judge not”.” By saying that Christianity and Islam are similar, guess what? You just made a judgement.
 
Islam and Christianity are actually similar.
how?

the church is founded on the principle that Jesus died and was resurrected. the Koran denies Jesus died and instead an impostor was crucified.

We believe in and follow Jesus Christ as part of the trinity

the Koran denies the deity of Jesus.
 
how?

the church is founded on the principle that Jesus died and was resurrected. the Koran denies Jesus died and instead an impostor was crucified.

We believe in and follow Jesus Christ as part of the trinity

the Koran denies the deity of Jesus.
Ignorance is Bliss.
 
So Islam is evil in your opinion?
Not what I’m claiming, and I won’t speak about it. My problem is that you chose to say “we’re just as bad” rather than make a defense for Islam. Rather than say, “That’s not actually what it teaches,” you went on about how we “can’t judge”, because, “Christianity has radicals, too.”

Here’s a little of what Saint Thomas Aquinas said of judging:

Judgements on men differ from judgements about things. In judging things we do them no harm, however we judge them; only the quality of our judgement is at stake. But when we judge men, it is their good or harm, honor or dishonor, that is at stake. So we must be biased towards judging well of them unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.
 
I think ignorance might have something to do with it. They simply aren’t aware of the fact that the Shariah mandates that any apostate should be killed.
And anyone who refuses to recognize Mohammed as "The Prophet of God’ and refuses to submit to Islam. Just like the bus killing in Egypt which took place after Manchester. But no one mourns a Christian.
They think that if someone brings an accusation about Islam that sounds bad, that it must be because the accuser is an Islamophobe. If we present evidences that are on point and are unflattering and they still don’t see it, then they are blind. We ought to pray for people like that; words can only get you so far.
They then bring up the crusades, which were defenses against Islamic aggression. They are confused. They think that just because they are “minorities” that they should be protected.

Ignorance and hatred of Christianity are at the root. AKA, Satan is alive and active.
 
One reason I can think of right of the top of my head is simply that Christianity is a “softer,” easier target for the Left, since they know it more than Islam and also know that there will not be retaliation of a violent kind against for it. They hate ALL religion, actually, but Christianity is a more convenient, easier target, as I stated before.

They know that Islam will NOT let them get away with the kind of abuse they heap on Christ and Christianity if they did it with Mohammed and Islam. If there was a “**** Mohammed,” for example, the artist would have to go into the witness protection program and have to change their identity and the exhibition would be pulled down because of perceived “Islamophobia” and constant abuse and boycotts/threats from the likes of CAIR.

Hindu-Canadian-American comedian Russell Peters sort of got to the point (somewhat, at least) when he related in a routine about how he was asked why he did not make fun of Muslims and Islam really that much while he was always making fun of Christianity---------he said, “I don’t want to die.” :p:o
 
Because Muslims in the West are ‘oppressed’ (I use the term loosely).

The name calling, the disrespect of Islam by the West that increased because of the terrorism etc. Most of them are also POC.

Supporting them is congruent with their anti racism/equality for all philosophy.

Plus the fact that the right doesn’t seem fond of Islam makes them like it more.

It’s really not that complicated. Honestly. They don’t support Islam, they support Muslims. They are just as intolerant of Islam’s anti gay/women/etc beliefs, just like they are with Christianity. But because they are fond of all of these oppressed groups, they tend to push their focus on Christianity, which seems like the ‘privileged’ religion in the West. If Muslims were in power in the West, they would obviously start to be more vocal about their hatred of religion. We already saw a glimpse of it after the gay nightclub shooting in Orlando
 
Can someone explain to me why the political right are so racist?
 
Team Obama fights to have German Home-school family deported
foxnews.com/opinion/2014/03/03/team-obama-wins-fight-to-have-christian-home-school-family-deported.html

Obama’s cruel policy reversal on Cuban refugees
washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/01/14/obamas-cruel-policy-reversal-on-cuban-refugees/?utm_term=.bb3deecbc8f4

:rotfl:

In other words, we need a double standard so leftists can virtue-signal, avoid being called racist and should radical Muslims conquer the west, they may consider not executing them.

Rallies against Islamic law draw (left-wing) counter-protests
foxnews.com/us/2017/06/10/marches-against-islamic-law-to-be-held-in-many-us-cities.html
The counter protests were because no-one really believed that the original protests were about sharia law, but rather were rooted in xenophobia. There have been many instances lately of Muslims’ lives being made incredibly difficult by people discriminating against them. Just like a lot of conservatives were convinced that the March for Science was really an anti-Trump, anti-GOP march, this protest was seen as an anti-Islam, anti-immigrant march.

And no, I wasn’t saying that we NEED double standards, but if an Orthodox Jewish woman tells me I’m dressed immodestly, I’d be more interested in asking her why she feels that way than anything else. If a fundamentalist Catholic woman told me that, I’d get really mad. Because I want to understand where the first woman is coming from and why she feels the need to call me out on it, whereas I KNOW the Catholic Church’s teaching inside out so I’m not going to like being told what to do by a Catholic who takes things too far.

Now, to apply that logic to the western “left”, they are mostly loose Christians or former Christians. So, anyone that professes a stricter version of their own beliefs will really annoy them.

That being said, sexist behaviors are not tolerated by the left from any religion, I’m just giving reasons as to why certain people might be less vocal about Islam. I think really it’s just something the right say that they left do because the left make them feel bad when they do a better job of behaving like Christians in this particular regard.
 
I have noticed that liberals seem very soft on Islam, something which has always bothered me. But I do have some libtard friends, one of whom attends a church out in California, so I emailed this question to him.
His reply was truly amazing as you will see.

He said his attitude toward Muslims was spelled out by his church’s constitution in article 8.41 and he sent me this quote:
"The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims. . ."
This seemed incredible to me, and I would not have believed that any Christian church could say something like this if I had not seen it with my own eyes.

But, wait, it gets even worse. My friend emailed me a 1965 letter from one of his top church officials, a guy by the name of Paul Sixtus. It had the title of “In Our Time,” and said this:
"Our Church regards with esteem also the Muslims. They adore the one God . . .just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God."

So there you have it. California leftists are required by their churches to regard Muslims with “esteem” and to view Islam as a “faith” that is included in the “plan of salvation.”
I really don’t understand why any Christian Church would do something like this.
Maybe they have been infiltrated by Muslim secret operatives. Should the F.B.I be brought in to investigate?
 
I have noticed that liberals seem very soft on Islam, something which has always bothered me. But I do have some libtard friends, one of whom attends a church out in California, so I emailed this question to him.
His reply was truly amazing as you will see.

He said his attitude toward Muslims was spelled out by his church’s constitution in article 8.41 and he sent me this quote:
"The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims. . ."
This seemed incredible to me, and I would not have believed that any Christian church could say something like this if I had not seen it with my own eyes.

But, wait, it gets even worse. My friend emailed me a 1965 letter from one of his top church officials, a guy by the name of Paul Sixtus. It had the title of “In Our Time,” and said this:
"Our Church regards with esteem also the Muslims. They adore the one God . . .just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God."

So there you have it. California leftists are required by their churches to regard Muslims with “esteem” and to view Islam as a “faith” that is included in the “plan of salvation.”
I really don’t understand why any Christian Church would do something like this.
Maybe they have been infiltrated by Muslim secret operatives. Should the F.B.I be brought in to investigate?
The Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition

The Church and non-Christians

839 "Those who have not yet received the Gospel are related to the People of God in various ways."325

The relationship of the Church with the Jewish People. When she delves into her own mystery, the Church, the People of God in the New Covenant, discovers her link with the Jewish People,326 "the first to hear the Word of God."327 The Jewish faith, unlike other non-Christian religions, is already a response to God’s revelation in the Old Covenant. To the Jews “belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises; to them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ”,328 "for the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable."329

325 Lumen gentium 16. [Vatican II, 1965]
326 Cf. Nostra aetate 4. [Vatican II, 1965]
327 Roman Missal, Good Friday 13:General Intercessions,VI.
328 Rom 9:4-5.
329 Rom 11:29.

840 And when one considers the future, God’s People of the Old Covenant and the new People of God tend towards similar goals: expectation of the coming (or the return) of the Messiah. But one awaits the return of the Messiah who died and rose from the dead and is recognized as Lord and Son of God; the other awaits the coming of a Messiah, whose features remain hidden till the end of time; and the latter waiting is accompanied by the drama of not knowing or of misunderstanding Christ Jesus.

841 The Church’s relationship with the Muslims. "The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day."330

330 Lumen gentium 16; cf. Nostra aetate 3. [Vatican II, 1965]

842 The Church’s bond with non-Christian religions is in the first place the common origin and end of the human race:

All nations form but one community. This is so because all stem from the one stock which God created to people the entire earth, and also because all share a common destiny, namely God. His providence, evident goodness, and saving designs extend to all against the day when the elect are gathered together in the holy city. . .331

331 Nostra aetate 1 [Vatican II, 1965]

843 The Catholic Church recognizes in other religions that search, among shadows and images, for the God who is unknown yet near since he gives life and breath and all things and wants all men to be saved. Thus, the Church considers all goodness and truth found in these religions as "a preparation for the Gospel and given by him who enlightens all men that they may at length have life."332

332 Luman Gentium 16; cf. Nostra aetate 2; Evangelii nuntiandi 53.

844 In their religious behavior, however, men also display the limits and errors that disfigure the image of God in them:

Very often, deceived by the Evil One, men have become vain in their reasonings, and have exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and served the creature rather than the Creator. Or else, living and dying in this world without God, they are exposed to ultimate despair.333

333 Lumen Gentium 16; cf. Rom 1:21, 25.

845 To reunite all his children, scattered and led astray by sin, the Father willed to call the whole of humanity together into his Son’s Church. The Church is the place where humanity must rediscover its unity and salvation. The Church is “the world reconciled.” She is that bark which “in the full sail of the Lord’s cross, by the breath of the Holy Spirit, navigates safely in this world.” According to another image dear to the Church Fathers, she is prefigured by Noah’s ark, which alone saves from the flood.334

334 St. Augustine, Serm. 96,7,9:PL 38,588; St. Ambrose, De virg. 18 118:PL 16,297B; cf. already 1 Pet 3:20-21. PL = J.P. Migne, ed., Patroligia Latina (Paris, 1841-1855)

w2.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19641121_lumen-gentium_en.html
w2.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_nostra-aetate_en.html
w2.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_p-vi_exh_19751208_evangelii-nuntiandi.html
 
The political left thinks that there is no divine authority.

So they think they can set up any kind of authority.

The liberal left chose to consider authority the defense of any perceived minority in the western civilization.

So they must fight Christianity because is a majority and has a different view on authority.

First they tried to use Buddhism as a default religion but Islam has the advantage to be openly against Christianity.

So the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

The authoritarian left use the darwinian fitness (military power) as authority. Communism is the best example.
 
But, wait, it gets even worse. My friend emailed me a 1965 letter from one of his top church officials, a guy by the name of Paul Sixtus. It had the title of “In Our Time,” and said this:
"Our Church regards with esteem also the Muslims. They adore the one God . . .just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God."

So there you have it. California leftists are required by their churches to regard Muslims with “esteem” and to view Islam as a “faith” that is included in the “plan of salvation.”
I really don’t understand why any Christian Church would do something like this.
Maybe they have been infiltrated by Muslim secret operatives. Should the F.B.I be brought in to investigate?
The quote is from Pope John Paul II:

“The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth,(5) who has spoken to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, His virgin Mother; at times they even call on her with devotion. In addition, they await the day of judgment when God will render their deserts to all those who have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value the moral life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and fasting.” - w2.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_nostra-aetate_en.html

So there you have it. Maybe Americans should try to understand instead of inventing conspiracy theories 👍.
 
Pots calling kettles black.
Arguments as to which of the fire or the pan is better.
I don’t like the heat and would prefer to stay out of the kitchen.

But seeing that we’ve got to eat, I’ll bite.

We come to God one heart at a time.
Other than that it’s all about building Towers of Babel.
It is the meek who will inherit the earth.
 
But, wait, it gets even worse. My friend emailed me a 1965 letter from one of his top church officials, a guy by the name of Paul Sixtus. It had the title of “In Our Time,” and said this:
"Our Church regards with esteem also the Muslims. They adore the one God . . .just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God."

So there you have it. California leftists are required by their churches to regard Muslims with “esteem” and to view Islam as a “faith” that is included in the “plan of salvation.”
I really don’t understand why any Christian Church would do something like this.
Maybe they have been infiltrated by Muslim secret operatives. Should the F.B.I be brought in to investigate?
Yup, John Paul II said it:

“The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth,(5) who has spoken to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, His virgin Mother; at times they even call on her with devotion. In addition, they await the day of judgment when God will render their deserts to all those who have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value the moral life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and fasting.” - w2.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_nostra-aetate_en.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top