Watch the videos posted by Caldera.7_Sorrows:
How so? The FBI, from multiple sources, learned that Trump had a Russian agent on his team, which was having meetings with other Russian agents to assist in the campaign. What would you have the FBI do on behalf of the American people in this case?
Finding a candidate’s position disturbing is hardly evidence pf partiality, nor is it evidence of “cheating”.
What on earth of significance did you glean from that?
I stay abreast of the facts, and open to cogent analysis, in contrast to so many who never seem to go beyond the meme fed to them by their chosen media.
Do you not know the difference between low and void?
I think Dems should be every bit as concerned about this as Repubs. So, okay, Dems hate Trump, and distrust him. What would they think if Trump supporters in the FBI and DOJ someday did this to their presidential candidate?
I’d say it wasn’t by accident that this happened. This was the purpose of the PATRIOT Act et al. I’d say it is the purpose of the CIA, NSA and even FBI. Regardless of its purpose secret government will always be abusive. The argument against it isn’t that a particular group of people can’t be trusted but that such a system can’t be trusted no matter who the people running it are.
Only the facts that support your reality interest you.petra22:
I am far more abreast of the facts, and open to cogent analysis, than the many who never seem to go beyond the meme fed to them by their chosen media.
Some deference must be given to those who have command of a great number of facts and can state them well. However, that’s not necessarily persuasive, nor should it necessarily be. I have, in my time, seen enormously comprehensive and persuasive financials, for example, issued by companies that were insolvent despite their “proof” otherwise.
This is the part i don’t get… for a group of people who are constantly saying we have Hitler/Stalin in the White House, they sure don’t seem too worried about having the kind of abuse of power we are talking about here at the fingertips of someone they believe is so incredibly bad. This should concern everyone.
Deep down, I think many see the ‘Trump movement’ as transient,
No. It selected facts to support a partisan view and omitted others contradictory to that view. Read Gowdy for a far less biased perspective.
Exactly! They love to make movies about Watergate and the Pentagon Papers, but because now the democrat party is guilty of gross corruption, they prefer to deny, deny, deny and look the other way.Ridgerunner:
This is the part i don’t get… for a group of people who are constantly saying we have Hitler/Stalin in the White House, they sure don’t seem too worried about having the kind of abuse of power we are talking about here at the fingertips of someone they believe is so incredibly bad. This should concern everyone.