A
aborodki
Guest
I came upon this claim but couldn’t articulate theologically why it is ludicrous. Why do we believe that God relates to human beings thru a trinity as opposed to four people ( fourth person we haven’t yet met.)
There was a discussion on this a long while back that you might still find.I came upon this claim but couldn’t articulate theologically why it is ludicrous. Why do we believe that God relates to human beings thru a trinity as opposed to four people ( fourth person we haven’t yet met.)
I won’t make any pretense to understand the Great Mystery of the Holy Trinity any more than anybody on this entire Catholic Forum Site. For every devout Catholic it’s a Dogmatic Mystery of Faith inspired and entrusted to the Church Fathers.I came upon this claim but couldn’t articulate theologically why it is ludicrous. Why do we believe that God relates to human beings thru a trinity as opposed to four people ( fourth person we haven’t yet met.)
There is therefore nothing created, nothing subject to another in the Trinity: nor is there anything that has been added as though it once had not existed, but had entered afterwards: therefore the Father has never been without the Son, nor the Son without the Spirit: and this same Trinity is immutable and unalterable forever (P.G., X, 986).
Very interesting question. allow me please to "take a stab at answering it."aborodki-I came upon this claim but couldn’t articulate theologically why it is ludicrous. Why do we believe that God relates to human beings thru a trinity as opposed to four people ( fourth person we haven’t yet met.)
***Very interesting question. Allow me please to “take a stab at answering it.”aborodki-I came upon this claim but couldn’t articulate theologically why it is ludicrous. Why do we believe that God relates to human beings thru a trinity as opposed to four people (fourth person we haven’t yet met.)
I came upon this claim but couldn’t articulate theologically why it is ludicrous. Why do we believe that God relates to human beings thru a trinity as opposed to four people ( fourth person we haven’t yet met.)
That is a good question because no bible writer teaches the doctrine of the Trinity. The basic concept which is the foundation of all legitimate doctrine is taught by one or more bible writers, in context. While not every detail is found in one passage, the basic concept will be there as a teaching.I came upon this claim but couldn’t articulate theologically why it is ludicrous. Why do we believe that God relates to human beings thru a trinity as opposed to four people ( fourth person we haven’t yet met.)
This is your answer.The reason God is a Trinity is because God is love. Love requires twoness, in fact threeness: the lover, the beloved, and the act, or relationship, of love between them. God is Trinity because God is love itself in its completeness.
Oh really=Dan Parke-That is a good question because no bible writer teaches the doctrine of the Trinity. The basic concept which is the foundation of all legitimate doctrine is taught by one or more bible writers, in context. While not every detail is found in one passage, the basic concept will be there as a teaching.
None of my references are “out of context.” But what do you find wrong about using the entire bible? If its in the Bible its God Word, Divinely Inspired and TRUE.For example, baptism. We don’t need to take a water verse from one bible writer teaching one context and a dunking verse from another bible writer teaching in yet another context and a repentance verse from (you guessed it!) yet another bible writer teaching a doctrine other than baptism and then paste them all together like a patchwork quilt to form a doctrine that no bible writer ever articulated. Each of the synoptic gospels puts these basic elements together for us to form the basic concept of Christian baptism.Not so the Trinity. It stands alone.
How about because its true and in the Bible for starters!**Catholics (and Protestants!) why do you believe it?Dan
Oh really
***What about Matthew 3: 13 "Then Jesus came from Galilee to the Jordan to John, to be baptized by him. John would have prevented him, saying, “I need to be baptized by you, and do you come to me?” But Jesus answered him, “Let it be so now; for thus it is fitting for us to fulfil all righteousness.” Then he consented. And when Jesus [the Son] ***was baptized, he went up immediately from the water, and behold, the heavens were opened and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, [The Holy Spirit] and alighting on him; and lo, a voice from heaven, saying, "This is my beloved Son, [God the Father]in whom I am well pleased.
Help me out here is that NOT The Trinity:shrug: and how about this.
Dan:
Perhaps you could define the Trinity for me. I define the Trinity as the teaching that there is one God and that three persons are that one God. Some have described it as three whos, one what. The what is God’s being and the whos are the three persons so that all three persons are the same being.
I have made the challenge that no bible writer teaches the basic concept of the Trinity in context. How is your example any different that finding a verse which mentions Peter, James and John in the same context and then just making up the “fact” that they happen to be one Being?
PJM
It appears to me that to you the Trinity is three being mentioned in the same verse without the need or teaching that they are one God or one being.
We know Jesus is mentioned a zillion times what about “The Father and The Holy Spirit”
The FatherU] [here is the short version.]
Matthew: 11:27, 28:19, 24:36 Mark … Luke 10:22, John: [12 times in chapter 14 alone] , Paul:Gal. 1:3, 2 Thess. 1:2, 1 Cor. 8:6, 2 Tim.1:2, Eph. 3:14 ECT.
The Holy Spirit
Matthew:3:11, 1:20, 28:19, 12:32, Mark: 3:28, 13:11, 1:8, 12:36, Luke: 1:16, 12:11, 3:22, 10:21, 11:13 John: 20:23, 14:25, 1:34 Paul: 1:5, 15:13, 2 Cor. 13:14, Heb. 6:5 Ect.
So much for it not being in the bible:blush:
Love and prayers,
Dan:
I don’t deny the existence of the Father or of the Son or of the holy spirit. I deny that any bible writer teaches they are the same God or the same Being.
None of my references are “out of context.” But what do you find wrong about using the entire bible? If its in the Bible its God Word, Divinely Inspired and TRUE.Feel free to check them out for yourself.
How about because its true and in the Bible for starters!
Dan:
Again, please define the Trinity for me (in case you disagree with what I wrote above) and then show me where a bible writer teaches the basic concept of the Trinity.
Catholics and Protestants, why do you believe the doctrine of the Trinity?
Dan
John 14:**=Dan Parker-That is a good question because no bible writer teaches the doctrine of the Trinity. The basic concept which is the foundation of all legitimate doctrine is taught by one or more bible writers, in context. While not every detail is found in one passage, the basic concept will be there as a teaching. **
Dan:
Again, please define the Trinity for me (in case you disagree with what I wrote above) and then show me where a bible writer teaches the basic concept of the Trinity.
Catholics and Protestants, why do you believe the doctrine of the Trinity?
Dan
"‘If you know me, then you will also know my father. From now on you do know him and have seen him.’ Philip said to him, ‘Master, show us the Father, and that will be enough for us.’ Jesus said to him, 'Have I been with you for so long a time and you still do not know me, Philip? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I speak to you I do not speak on my own. The Father who dwells in me is doing his works.
Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me,
I’m sure you know Matthew 28:19, and I can’t see how you cannot interpret this as the Trinity:or else, believe because of the works themselves.’"
And Jesus also expounded on the oneness of God. He was a Jew, after all:“Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy Spirit…”
Jesus was a Jew, and thus fiercely monotheistic. Yet he also taught us to baptize people in the name of three persons, and he said that he was one with the Father.“Jesus replied, ‘The first is this: ‘Hear, O Israel! The Lord our God is Lord alone!…’’ The scribe said to him, 'Well said, teacher. You are right in saying, 'He is One and there is no other than he…’ And when Jesus saw that he answered with understanding, he said to him, ‘You are not far from the kingdom of God.’”
Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me, or else, believe because of the works themselves.’""‘If you know me, then you will also know my father. From now on you do know him and have seen him.’ Philip said to him, ‘Master, show us the Father, and that will be enough for us.’ Jesus said to him, 'Have I been with you for so long a time and you still do not know me, Philip? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I speak to you I do not speak on my own. The Father who dwells in me is doing his works.
, and the way we know that he remains in us is from the Spirit that he gave us.NAB 1 John 3:24 Those who keep his commandments remain** in him, and he in them**
Dan:“Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy Spirit…”
Dan:“Jesus replied, ‘The first is this: ‘Hear, O Israel! The Lord our God is Lord alone!..’’ The scribe said to him, 'Well said, teacher. You are right in saying, ‘He is One and there is no other than he…’ And when Jesus saw that he answered with understanding, he said to him, ‘You are not far from the kingdom of God.’”
***My dear freind Dan,**=Dan Parker-That is a good question because no bible writer teaches the doctrine of the Trinity. The basic concept which is the foundation of all legitimate doctrine is taught by one or more bible writers, in context. While not every detail is found in one passage, the basic concept will be there as a teaching. **
Dan:
Again, please define the Trinity for me (in case you disagree with what I wrote above) and then show me where a bible writer teaches the basic concept of the Trinity.
Catholics and Protestants, why do you believe the doctrine of the Trinity?
Dan
Dan Parker is a JW. I do not think that they believe in OSAS. I could be wrong but they are usually accused of believing in a works-based salvation and not a OSAS salvation.***My dear freind Dan,
If you don’t listen to God, don’t accept the bible because it does not have the word “Trinity” in it, I would ponit out that it does not say “once saved always saved” either. The difference is that the TRINITY is in the Bible, but OSAS is not.
What does that say about your Faith!
Love and prayers Dan,
If you don’t want to know, perhaps you shouldn’t ask, it seems to be illogical:shrug:***
I have not made the argument that the Trinity is not true because word is not found in the bible. That is a misrepresentation of my argument. Please go back and read it. I argue that no bible writer teaches the basic concept of the Trinity in context in the same manner as other doctrines are taught. For example, baptism, eternal life, eternal punishment, ransom sacrifice and the resurrection from the dead are all taught in at least their basic forms by bible writers.***My dear freind Dan,
If you don’t listen to God, don’t accept the bible because it does not have the word “Trinity” in it, I would ponit out that it does not say “once saved always saved” either. The difference is that the TRINITY is in the Bible, but OSAS is not.
What does that say about your Faith!
Love and prayers Dan,
If you don’t want to know, perhaps you shouldn’t ask, it seems to be illogical:shrug:***
You are correct that we do not believe OSAS. We also don’t believe one can work ones way to salvation and our publications are quite specific on this matter.Dan Parker is a JW. I do not think that they believe in OSAS. I could be wrong but they are usually accused of believing in a works-based salvation and not a OSAS salvation.
God bless you
Very good.There was a discussion on this a long while back that you might still find.
The reason God is a Trinity is because God is love. Love requires twoness, in fact threeness: the lover, the beloved, and the act, or relationship, of love between them. God is Trinity because God is love itself in its completeness.
Dan,You are correct that we do not believe OSAS. We also don’t believe one can work ones way to salvation and our publications are quite specific on this matter.
Dan