R
RCIAGraduate
Guest
Didn’t someone people not like that themselves?
Poles would never have chosen communism of their own accord. Poland is a very ambitious, hard-working, materialistic (in both good and bad ways) society. When I first went to Poland in 1990, artifacts of the communist system were still in place — a large bas-relief of the ideal socialist worker, with hammer and sickle if I recall correctly, in the atrium of the Palac Kultury in Warsaw (Palace of Culture, the huge Stalinist skyscraper in the middle of downtown), and another building with a large neon sign on the roof, “Centrum Techniczne ZSRR” (USSR Technical Center) on one of the main highways. They didn’t waste much time in getting rid of the socialist sculpture, and in chopping off the “ZSRR” part. I can easily imagine it being detached with acetylene torches and dumped over the side of the building to crash to the ground several stories below. (I don’t know if that’s what happened, but it’s easy to imagine. I don’t think it blew over in a windstorm.) Modern-day Warsaw, seen from the airport several clicks out, looks like Charlotte, North Carolina, gleaming skyscrapers of glass, pretty impressive skyline. Under communism it was a gray, concrete, depressing, ugly city. I have definitely seen the “before and after”.I would add that communism in Poland resulted from occupation by an outside force. Had it been a result of Poles it might have been harder to resist.
We are way off target, but I think it is a beautiful building. I love at deco architecture.I don’t think the Palac Kultury is a particularly bad-looking building, but mine would be the minority opinion in Poland.
I am not one to shudder at the thought of “thread drift” when the thread goes in a useful direction. This discussion is related to the greatness of Pope John Paul II. Poland’s renaissance after overthrowing communism is part of that.I don’t think the Palac Kultury is a particularly bad-looking building, but mine would be the minority opinion in Poland.
I don’t know if “art deco” is the term, but it is postwar Stalinist architecture. I’ve been in the building and even on the observation deck. I think it’s a pretty nice-looking, impressive building. But Poles resent it because it is a huge reminder of Stalinist and communist days. After the fall of communism there was talk of demolishing it. It’s not that the building is ugly, it’s what it connotes.
I have to imagine that was something to see!Okay, if we can indulge in one more off-topic piece… I saw BB King in concert at the Sala Kongressowa in the Palac Kultury (1995-6? Not sure of date). The seats were terribly small with no leg room and I was relieved when everyone finally stood up.
(God or Nothing, Ignatius Press, 2015, p. 93)This pope shows the glory of suffering. His pontificate was prodigious and at the same time crucified. John Paul II experienced great triumphs for the Church on the international, politic, and media scene. On the pastoral level, his contribution was essential, particularly his dialogue with youth, whom he set back on the path of Jesus. And yet he remained a pontiff closely associated with the Passion and suffering of Christ. For, in union with the Son of God, the successes always brought trials with them. The pope lived fully the glorious mystery of Christ, the mystery of the Cross, in which victory triumphs.