M
mathonihah
Guest
I think I know whom I worship better than you do.Uh im sorry but you dont…
I think I know whom I worship better than you do.Uh im sorry but you dont…
Your knowledge of Mormonism appears to be extremely limited. I suggest you learn more before posting.Im assuming JS stands for joe smith right? Who is he to pick what a word means? We have seen this time after time with mormons. They choose the definition(s) of what words mean to better suite their beliefs.
You don’t know what you are talking about. Read the thread before posting.Its poison if you consume large amounts of it in one sitting. But to partake of it in moderation is okay. So Jesus was filling Himself with poison?![]()
Sure you do. You just don’t want to.Sorry, don’t get it.
I worship the God and Jesus of the Bible. Not sure about you.
No, you don’t. And I AM sure about you
Actually, it is fact. Doctrines like God once being a sinful man, doctrines of polygamy (that is not ended, just not currently practiced), doctrines of Adam being our God, etc etcThat is your opinion, which you are entitled to; but it doesn’t prove anything.
Gasp! One of your Apostles was wrong! Yet he published it in a BOOK! And all he was doing was publishing what other LDS had taught…Well that was not the first time that he was wrong about something.
Hmmmm…I did not know wine was poison. Where did you get that idea from?That is a strange one. So you reckon we should wilfully drink poison, knowing that it is poison, and then trust God that he will save us? Never heard of that before. Where did you get that idea from?
Not to Joe.There is a difference between “another gospel” and a “restored gospel”.
Nice dodge. Don’t blame youAs I said, I am not going to discuss the subject of the Apostasy any further in this thread. If you are interested in that subject, start a new thread, and I will join you there and answer your questions.
apparently notI think I know whom I worship better than you do.
lol…no…it contains the one version the LDS Church liked the best. Joe gave the LDS Church many versions to choose fromYour knowledge of Mormonism appears to be extremely limited. I suggest you learn more before posting.
JS–H is an abbreviation for “Joseph Smith—History,” which is a book of Mormon scripture printed in the Pearl of Great Price, and contains an account of Joseph Smith’s First Vision in which he saw the Father and the Son.
He wasn’t an Apostle when he wrote the book.Gasp! One of your Apostles was wrong!
Oh I get it. Just because something is published in a book, that makes it official. Okay, I didn’t know that.Yet he published it in a BOOK!
And all he was doing was publishing what other LDS had taught…
Some of them were, yes.were they wrong, too?
He wasn’t an Apostle when he wrote the book.
Even worse! After publishing the doctrine about the Catholic Church, they made him an apostle…(by the way, I knew that, I just wanted you to bring it to everyone’s attention that he was awarded with apostleship after publishing the doctrine)
Oh I get it. Just because something is published in a book, that makes it official. Okay, I didn’t know that.
The Book was titled MORMON DOCTRINE. And now you know that.
Some of them were, yes.
The mark of false prophets and apostles is to teach false doctrine. Thank you for admitting that
Sure you do. You just don’t want to.
But, I do not mind explaining.
Only an LDS “god” could be that cruel.
- Jesus told His Apostles that He would never leave them, and that His Church would never die. IF an Apostasy occurred…then Jesus lied. Second, if Jesus could not even keep his Church going, then Jesus was weak.
- Jesus sent His best friends out to preach His Gospel and to build His Church. How cruel He had to be to send His best friends out KNOWING that they would die horrible deaths while KNOWING the Church He was sending them build would die soon after the last of their horrible deaths.
I told you; if you are interested in the Apostasy, start a new thread, and we will talk about it there. That is not the sublet of this thread.Nice dodge. Don’t blame you
Ditto. Restoration presupposes an Apostasy; and Apostasy presupposes unauthorised changes in, or removal from scripture. You keep pushing me to discuss the Apostasy with you in this thread, and I am not going to.Not to Joe.
The “gospel” he came up with is DIFFERENT.
For example…show me ANYWHERE in the Bible where anyone who is anointed as a Priest or prophet or Apostle is given the Melchizedek Priesthood. All those different writers and not a single one mentioned it?
Show me ANYWHERE in the Bible where it says God was a sinful man.
That is an absurd, ridiculous, and nonsensical reply to my post. I was responding to his post expressing ignorance of what JS–H meant; not how many different versions of the First Vision are in existence.lol…no…it contains the one version the LDS Church liked the best. Joe gave the LDS Church many versions to choose from
I told you; if you are interested in the Apostasy, start a new thread, and we will talk about it there. That is not the sublet of this thread.
actually, it is, since the apostasy is one of the reasons one would want to be LDS, right? No need to dodge.
Ditto. Restoration presupposes an Apostasy; and Apostasy presupposes unauthorised changes in, or removal from scripture. You keep pushing me to discuss the Apostasy with you in this thread, and I am not going to.
I can certainly understand your fear
And I was responding to you. You have a knack for calling things absurd and being condescending when folks mention truths you can’t defend…like the plethora of versions of the First Vision. The LDS Church just picked the one they liked best…That is an absurd, ridiculous, and nonsensical reply to my post. I was responding to his post expressing ignorance of what JS–H meant; not how many different versions of the First Vision are in existence.
ah…so you can’t show me in the Bible the things I asked you to show me. I accept your resignation.I told you; if you are interested in the Apostasy, start a new thread, and we will talk about it there. That is not the sublet of this thread.
Ditto. Restoration presupposes an Apostasy; and Apostasy presupposes unauthorised changes in, or removal from scripture. You keep pushing me to discuss the Apostasy with you in this thread, and I am not going to.