Why would God not save people he loves from hell?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stina
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
We have a just God, and a just God demands justice.
One thing I don’t get about this is that technically, what we deserve is hell, right? So doesn’t that mean God’s compassion overrides justice? And then, if that’s the case, if someone were to realize after death that they should have lived differently and they would not suffer, and then begged to go to heaven, wouldn’t God allow them?, because although they deserve to be there (as we all do, as sinners), God loves us enough that he would not be able to bear to see us suffer.
Just some thoughts!
 
One thing I don’t get about this is that technically, what we deserve is hell, right?

There’s no “technically” about it 🙂 - we have no right to be redeemed; we deserve damnation. Happily for us, God does not treat us as we deserve, but as He Wills; & His Will is that we should be converted to Him, & not perish.​

So doesn’t that mean God’s compassion overrides justice? And then, if that’s the case, if someone were to realize after death that they should have lived differently and they would not suffer, and then begged to go to heaven, wouldn’t God allow them?, because although they deserve to be there (as we all do, as sinners), God loves us enough that he would not be able to bear to see us suffer.
Just some thoughts!

After death, we do not change - we are confirmed in the choices we have made during this life,which is a probation for that which does not end, but is eternal​

Conversion from life in sin to life in God is possible only through grace - & there is no possibility of conversion in Hell. Grace has no place there - so all that remains is Wrath. To be damned is to hate the light, to flee it, to avoid it - & to do that, is to choose death, darkness & destruction. To reject God’s Mercy & Love means rejecting it - the doctrine of Hell is a reminder of this possibility. And if we do reject Him, that is the same as not accepting Him.

We cannot be forced to love God - for love that is forced, is unwilling love; it is not love at all. To be in Hell requires a knowing, conscious, deliberate rejection of God - & this requires freedom. If we make this choice, then we must take the consequences.

Besides, only holiness can live in Heaven - sin & selfishness & egotism cannot. That Hell is found to be unpleasant will not of itself make the holiness of God in Heaven any less of a torment. You’re asking for God to cease to be Holy, to cease to be God; not during this life (when conversion is still possible) but in the next (when it is not). You’re asking for creation to be centred, not upon Jesus Christ, but to be altered for the selfish convenience of those who hate & loathe Him. Which is indescribably unfair 😦

The damned (if any there are) deserve no pity - they insisted on rejecting God, & now they have their will for all eternity; it is no fault of God’s if they do not like it. Christ OTOH does deserve much pity, for He is constantly blamed for the wickedness which we human beings commit, which He died to save us from. What more could He have done than He has, to show us His enmity to sin & the punishments due to it ?

ISTM that a lot of the trouble we have with the doctrine of eternal punishment comes from having a low view of sin. It is so great an evil that (as Cardinal Newman points out) it would be better for the entire world to perish in extreme agony, than to commit a single sin. The real wonder is that anyone can be saved at all.
  • I said, “The Catholic Church holds it better for the sun and moon to drop from heaven, for the earth to fail, and for all the many millions on it to die of starvation in extremest agony, as far as temporal affliction goes, than that one soul, I will not say, should be lost, but should commit one single venial sin, should tell one wilful untruth, or should steal one poor farthing without excuse.”
    newmanreader.org/works/apologia65/chapter5.html
 
[tabcom;3027325]In return, I would ask, 'What’s the natural moral law have to do with the gospel being written on the hearts of the believers – only?
I would say that’s wrong and that’s precisely why I asked you. The moral law isn’t just written on the hearts of “believers only” but everyone.
Paul in Romans 1:19-20 speaks of those who can see God through creation, then goes on in chapter 2:14-16 where he is saying that ALL people are intrinsically born with the “gospel written on their heart” and what Paul means by this is that every person inherently knows right from wrong; that’s why everyone has a conscience and that’s why Paul says:

that even though they do not have the law (meaing that the law was a guide to show men right from wrong)

"by nature (by the natural law; that they were made with the gospel written on their hearts) observe the prescriptions of the law (meaning they observe the moral aspects of the law or that they observe the righteousness behind the law)

These Gentiles who haven’t heard of Christ “are a law for themselves even though they don’t have the law” (meaning there are some who don’t have the Mosaic law as a guide, like the Jews), yet they follow the grace they have received, (Luke 12:48)

Paul goes on to say…

“they show the demands of the law written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness and their conflicting thoughts accuse or even defend them on the day when…God will judge
peoples hidden works through Jesus Christ.”
(meaning that no person can say that they didn’t have the free will choice to follow the grace that they received; even their consciences will either condemn or defend them on jugdment day if they followed the natural moral law faithfully).
Le’ts back up for a moment . . .With respects to your statement . . .
I was simply providing the context as to who Paul was addressing, that is, the gospel is written on the hearts of the believers. Not on the hearts of the vessels of wrath fitted for destruction that he mentions in Rom 9:23.

Ok, granted. I see your point and agree with you that Paul is speaking to believers, in Rome, however I would disagree with you that Paul is saying that only believers have the gospel written on their hearts.
As Paul is writting to these Jewish and Gentile believers, he refers to a third party of Gentiles who aren’t formally “Christian” yet some will be saved, yet it is through Jesus that they are ultimately saved, but they will be saved because they have followed the moral law insofar as they knew what was wrong and right. Jesus said to the Jews in John 15:22 that before He revealed their sin to them they had no sin, however, after He did there sin remained.
Paul is saying that there are even some non-Jewish people will be saved even though they have heard the message of Jesus Christ because they did follow faithfully what grace God gave them. These people ARE saved ONLY because of and ONLY through Jesus Christ, which every person with proper faculties receives.
With that stated, could you please provide some clarity as to what you mean by natural moral law put into (not every man that ever lived hearts but . . ) the hearts of the believers?
Sure. 🙂 The natural moral law is knowing right from wrong. The Mosaic law only showed us what was wrong, God gave it to the people as a guide to convict and reveal their sin, however the Jews still knew right from wrong as does every person, pagan or believer.
Cain murdered Able before the Mosaic law was given right? Yet Cain inherently knew what he did was wrong before God.

Tribesmen who live in deep remote portions of Africa, South America or other very remote parts of the world know murder is wrong. Even those who lived in those places centuries ago, knew without contact with civilization, who never heared the gospel message, nor ever heared of God, knew that murdering another person was wrong and they knew precisely because they have the gospel written on their hearts.
Now they could have an ill-formed conscience, where their conscience doesn’t convict them, however at some point in their life when they committed a grave offense against God (perhaps their first offense), yet they knew in their conscience that what they did was wrong. They had guilt inside, whether they showed it or not; guilt comes from the conscience God gave us. Paul is saying in Rom 2:14-16 that there are some people who won’t hear the gospel, yet are judged by following their conscience (meaning following the little grace God gave them, Luke 12:48) and some of them will be saved, others won’t.
 
“Why would God not save people he loves from hell?”

simple, there is no such thing.
 
“Why would God not save people he loves from hell?”

simple, there is no such thing.
No, that would be incorrect. God IS love and love brings justice, ergo God brings justice through love.
God simply gives people what they want. If He didn’t then He wouldn’t truly be a God of love.

I love my children so much that I would die for any of them, however, if for some reason one of them chose not have a relationship with me and everything I tried failed, all of my attempts to bring them back into a relationship with me failed and that child told me that they did NOT want to have a relationship with me any longer,
would or should I force them into a relationship?

This is how God is, He is love and He loves you and I so much that He lets us choose what we want to do.
And when He gives us what we want, we still complain what we chose in the first place!

None of us HAS to choose to go to hell, none of us HAS to go to hell. We can all choose to go to heaven, yet God knows not all will.

Some people blame God for giving them what they want. If I go to Starbucks, order a carmel latte venti and they give me what I ordered, do I get angry at them because they gave me what I chose?🤷
 
God IS love and love brings justice, ergo God brings justice through love.
God simply gives people what they want. If He didn’t then He wouldn’t truly be a God of love.

I love my children so much that I would die for any of them, however, if for some reason one of them chose not have a relationship with me and everything I tried failed, all of my attempts to bring them back into a relationship with me failed and that child told me that they did NOT want to have a relationship with me any longer,
would or should I force them into a relationship?:
Thank you for this response. That actually makes a lot of sense.👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top