J
JM3
Guest
“ma li valak” is not a test or a rebuke.A more plausible explanation would be that Jesus was testing His mother’s faith. He did the same with the Canaanite woman.
“ma li valak” is not a test or a rebuke.A more plausible explanation would be that Jesus was testing His mother’s faith. He did the same with the Canaanite woman.
I just wanted to point out that you are absolutely correct when you say “but we were saved only by the death and Resurrection of our Christ”. I myself have never really used the term but I do not think it is going to far when it is used correctly. On the surface the word Co-redeemer does sound like it is going a little to far, but that is because in our culture we tend to think of “Co” meaning equal to, like Co-Captains. But in actuality the word Co is more along the lines of participating in or being a part of. If you really think it through at some point in our lives we can all be Co-redeemers. For example, let us say over the course of a few years you answer questions about God to a coworker of yours, who is an agnostic. If he eventual comes to Christ you have just become a Co-redeemer. We can both agree that he was saved only by the death and Resurrection of our Christ, however if you did not participate in bringing him the word he would have never found redemption. So basically. Mary is our Co-redeemer because with her help we can come closer to her son to receive the free gift of our salvation.
I hope that helps some
“What is that between you and Me?” Clearly you cannot diverge your opinion with that of God.“ma li valak” is not a test or a rebuke.
Your translation is faulty. Try “Why do you interfere with me”, as in Matthew 8:29 and Luke 8:28.“What is that between you and Me?” Clearly you cannot diverge your opinion with that of God.
Jesus was saying (in today 'a language) “Mom, it’s none of our business.”“What is that between you and Me?” Clearly you cannot diverge your opinion with that of God.
That translation would imply that Jesus thought Mary was butting into His mission. And considering what she does after…Your translation is faulty. Try “Why do you interfere with me”, as in Matthew 8:29 and Luke 8:28.
We should keep in mind that Jesus perfectly loved and perfectly honored His mother. The thought of dishonoring her or treating her with disrespect in any way would never occur to Him. Nor should it occur to us.That translation would imply that Jesus thought Mary was butting into His mission. And considering what she does after…
Hate the footnotes, love (or at least don’t hate) the text.I hate the NAB.
This article has a really good explaination about how Jesus was not rebuking or scolding Mary, but rather was warning her about the Cross.That translation would imply that Jesus thought Mary was butting into His mission. And considering what she does after…
Thanks for the link. Very interesting I never heard it explained this way.This article has a really good explaination about how Jesus was not rebuking or scolding Mary, but rather was warning her about the Cross.
shamelesspopery.com/do-whatever-he-tells-you/
I actually like this line of thinking. It really brings the whole family bond into the picture, which I believe Family is very important to God. Where would I look to further expand on this line of reasoning? Basically, we know Mary would know and understand the prophesies from the old testament. So what exactly from the old testament would make Mary “know what it would bring” what chain of events she was starting?This miracle would officially start his public ministry, so Jesus was basically saying “Mom, you know what will happen if I do this… Are you sure you are ready for what is to come next? Are you ready for the chain of events this will start?”
Mary knew what it would bring, but she still told the servants to do whatever He said. Jesus did as she requested not because she had power over him or because she is in charge, but because her request was in line with the will of God.
You are welcome MT1926! The Shameless Popery blog has a lot of really good insights into scripture.Thanks for the link. Very interesting I never heard it explained this way.
I actually like this line of thinking. It really brings the whole family bond into the picture, which I believe Family is very important to God. Where would I look to further expand on this line of reasoning? Basically, we know Mary would know and understand the prophesies from the old testament. So what exactly from the old testament would make Mary “know what it would bring” what chain of events she was starting?
Thanks Again
I don’t deny that Jesus’ mother played a part in salvation. But the term Redeemer goes to Jesus alone.There have been several posts about Mary’s role as “Co-Redemptrix”. The following links have some great info to see where Catholics get this concept:
So testing one’s faith is dishonoring that person…hmmn…We should keep in mind that Jesus perfectly loved and perfectly honored His mother. The thought of dishonoring her or treating her with disrespect in any way would never occur to Him. Nor should it occur to us.
Did you read the information at the links I posted?I don’t deny that Jesus’ mother played a part in salvation. But the term Redeemer goes to Jesus alone.
Originally Posted by JM3 View Post
We should keep in mind that Jesus perfectly loved and perfectly honored His mother. The thought of dishonoring her or treating her with disrespect in any way would never occur to Him. Nor should it occur to us.
No, but… I would say there is a very fine line between testing your parents faith and breaking the forth commandment. And as JM3 points out here even coming close to that line would never occur to Jesus. Because he knows we are fallible humans and if he were to come within an inch of that fine line we would take that to mean we are allowed to go a mile across the line. :sad_yes:So testing one’s faith is dishonoring that person…hmmn…![]()
I did.Did you read the information at the links I posted?
He often tested the faith of His sheep.No, but… I would say there is a very fine line between testing your parents faith and breaking the forth commandment. And as JM3 points out here even coming close to that line would never occur to Jesus. Because he knows we are fallible humans and if he were to come within an inch of that fine line we would take that to mean we are allowed to go a mile across the line. :sad_yes:
There is a very good reason Jesus refers to us as sheep.![]()
Matthew 4:7 would suggest that it is.So testing one’s faith is dishonoring that person…hmmn…![]()
God, not humans. So God dishonored Abraham by putting him to the test?Matthew 4:7 would suggest that it is.