O
o_mlly
Guest
The article called it, “no mutation, no evolution.” Big difference.That’s now what your article said. Your article called it a “mutation.”
I don’t claim Lederberg proves that the bacteria gene pool had all the elements preexisting to be penicillin resistant only that his data refutes your claim that there is “ **no experimental data to support it.” Yes, his data does support it.
Moreover contrary to evolution theory, Lederberg shows that no evolution is evidenced in his bacteria experiment.
I am referring to o_milly’s hypothesis that everything we have been calling “evolution” is just a rearrangement of genes that were already present in the first organisms. It is a nice theory, but there is no experimental data to support it.
Now, where is your experimental data supporting evolution?Another au contraire.
https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/side_0_0/lederberg_01
The Lederberg experiment
> So the *** penicillin-resistant bacteria were there in the population before they encountered penicillin. *** They did not evolve resistance in response to exposure to the antibiotic.