E
Edgar
Guest
A scientific law that says living organisms “are not static entities” - that’s so funny!
Why you should think that the Natural-Evolution of species is true
- Status
R
rossum
Guest
The Second Law of Thermodynamics says so. Living organisms rely on an energy flow to counter entropy. An energy flow is not static. When the energy flow stops the organism dies and entropy takes over.
B
Bradskii
Guest
Durnnit, you should have made him look it up…Edgar:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics says so. Living organisms rely on an energy flow to counter entropy. An energy flow is not static. When the energy flow stops the organism dies and entropy takes over.
M
Metis1
Guest
Over and over again some of us have asked for scientific evidence for this supposed magical wall that prevents evolution from going into macro-evolution, and over and over again no evidence is put forth, and yet some keep on insisting it’s there somewhere.
So, what typically happens then is their deflection into something else, such as one person’s asking for evidence for how life came from one life form. It has been explained before that this concept is a hypothesis, and a hypothesis is neither a scientific theory nor an axiom. We don’t have empirical evidence for this, which is why it’s a hypothesis.
But let me return back to one thing I’ve posted before, namely that it this wall supposedly exists, then why is it geneticists aren’t on board? Are they supposedly ignorant of their own field? Are they dishonest?
IMO, when religion begins to ignore the Truth, that religion has to be considered bogus because the Truth cannot be relative. To put it another way, we can use our faith for enlightenment or as an obstacle to Truth and, unfortunately, some have chosen the latter.
So, what typically happens then is their deflection into something else, such as one person’s asking for evidence for how life came from one life form. It has been explained before that this concept is a hypothesis, and a hypothesis is neither a scientific theory nor an axiom. We don’t have empirical evidence for this, which is why it’s a hypothesis.
But let me return back to one thing I’ve posted before, namely that it this wall supposedly exists, then why is it geneticists aren’t on board? Are they supposedly ignorant of their own field? Are they dishonest?
IMO, when religion begins to ignore the Truth, that religion has to be considered bogus because the Truth cannot be relative. To put it another way, we can use our faith for enlightenment or as an obstacle to Truth and, unfortunately, some have chosen the latter.
B
buffalo
Guest
Circular…
B
buffalo
Guest
And the latest science shows the cell can actually change the gene all by itself when needed, by design.
Last edited:
R
rossum
Guest
Definitions are circular. Just look at an English dictionary. All the definitions are written in… English.
Your inability to use the standard biological definition of macroevolution does not mean that macroevolution does not happen.
B
buffalo
Guest
This macro-evolution is actually devolution. The change arrow is degradation.
B
buffalo
Guest
How do they counter genetic entropy?
A
Aloysium
Guest
I’m not sure how more clearly the inability of modern science to describe life can be repeated.
The request is akin to asking for a recitation of the alphabet in three letters or less.
The other point is that macroevolution is purely an assumption that is unfalsifiable by looking at the fossil record, since it is an interpretation of how the physical remnants of long gone creatures are related. It has never been demonstrated but is assumed to be the same process as microevolution.
I would be glad to review any scientific evidence that disproves creation. Maybe that will be my response to your repeated request which fails to follow up on the replies.
P
PetraG
Guest
That is not the same as an entire breeding population changing the number of chromosomes. Being born with a different number of chromosomes is usually fatal and, as far as I know, incompatible with reproductive success.
A
Aloysium
Guest
I looked up constants:
Loading…
physics.info
The flux occurs on an unchangeable foundation, in this list the relationships that describe the physical universe. This layer of reality constitutes the building blocks of the next, which are those of living things, with ourselves as the crown creation.
B
Bradskii
Guest
I’ve no idea what you are talking about…entropy is not a constant.
Last edited:
A
Aloysium
Guest
Entropy can be said to be a property or constant that fills the entire universe.
Last edited:
R
rossum
Guest
By overproducing offspring and letting natural selection remove the less fit, which will tend to be the ones with higher genetic entropy on average. A fish may lay 10,000 eggs of which on average 2 will survive. That can remove a lot of entropy.
R
rossum
Guest
If someone said that then they said it incorrectly. Overall entropy always increases. It can decrease locally, but always at a cost of a greater increase elsewhere. A fridge decreases entropy by cooling its contents, but at a cost of increasing entropy in the room as it pumps the heat away.
B
Bradskii
Guest
Entropy is not a constant. It is in fact a variable. There is no excuse for you repeating the mistake. Google is your friend.
B
Bradskii
Guest
How are we getting on with the answer to that question? You know, about how we determine which theory is better than another? I’m really keen to know your position on this.rossum:
How do they counter genetic entropy?
M
Metis1
Guest
When did I say anything about “disproving creation”? Again, just more disingenuous deflection, which is why it is all but impossible to have a serious discussion with some people-- so I no longer am.
A
Aloysium
Guest
There are serious problems with communication that I attribute primarily. to simple arguentative temperaments.
Obviously, the principle of entropy, in keeping with the law of thermodynamics is everywhere or else a fridge in one part of the universe wouldn’t work.
Obviously, the principle of entropy, in keeping with the law of thermodynamics is everywhere or else a fridge in one part of the universe wouldn’t work.
- Status