R
Rubee
Guest
Simple! Suffering.
Human suffering?Simple! Suffering.
So the nature of organisms didn’t change. Adams relationship with other organisms changed.No. Suffering. In humans, it includes unnatural separation of body and soul, so yes: human death.
So it’s the teaching of the Catholic church that animals didn’t feel pain when eaten by other animals.
So it’s the teaching of the Catholic church that animals didn’t feel pain when eaten by other animals.I do not believe animal death involved pain or suffering.
Nice try. Cite my words yet again. Interesting how you never cite the Church you like to use as a weapon, though, lol. I’m careful with my words. Read them carefully. The CHurch and Bible simply teach that the Cosmos was affected by the world and is now in “corruption”.No. I do not believe animal death involved pain or suffering. Suffering is a result of man’s distortion of the Cosmos. Natural death is not.
You are saying that due to the fall of man animals suffer pain. This is what i think you are saying. Do you intend to mean something else?Nice try. Cite my words yet again. Interesting how you never cite the Church you like to use as a weapon, though, lol. I’m careful with my words. Read them carefully.
What does that mean?The CHurch and Bible simply teach that the Cosmos was affected by the world and is now in “corruption”.
Why are you pretending I said animal suffering was church teaching? Projections seem to be quite a major problem 4 you. No. The Church teaches the Cosmos was corrupted and the Bible teaches it was negatively affected. Suffering is my honest interpretation since that’s the worst thinmg in the cosmos. In fact, apart from sin, it is the ONLY bad thing.You are saying that due to the fall of man animals suffer pain. This is what i think you are saying. Do you intend to mean something else?
I asked you if that was church teaching.Why are you pretending I said animal suffering was church teaching?
So it’s not church teaching. This is just your interpretation. You do not really know.Suffering is my honest interpretation
About animal suffering? Sure. Human suffering on the other hand, is church teaching.So it’s not church teaching. This is just your interpretation. You do not really know.
That’s okay. We are all growing in our understanding and i do not know either what is meant when it is said that sin effected the world.
We both have different points of view on the matter. I don’t think that’s going to change so lets just agree to disagree.
I don’t know. But it cannot mean that animals didn’t die or eat each-other, and if God created ebola then viruses and diseases existed as well. So it must mean something else.What would you suppose the church means by this?^^^
Adam was not capable of sickness before the fall, though.diseases
Okay. But we are talking about the whole world, not just Adam here.Adam was not capable of sickness before the fall, though.
Do you mean what scientists talk about? Or something else?What do you think about the entropy idea?
I have often thought that what we think directly effects the world and what actually happens. Perhaps our sinful nature does cause the physical world on some level to change. Perhaps how we think of each-other directly effects what happens to us on a physical and psychological level.Quantum physics shows we affect the world in a weird way no one understands.
Actually, it’s a bit like how no one has to tell the Tooth Fairy when and where to go when a child loses a tooth … she just KNOWS.Yeah… but back in the day, things were much simpler, they didn’t need all this new fangle stuff like… information