B
buffalo
Guest
By definition they do not deny God. You should know this. They have to diss Scripture and Tradition to hold their view.They sure as all get out are denying your view of scripture, but are they denying God?
By definition they do not deny God. You should know this. They have to diss Scripture and Tradition to hold their view.They sure as all get out are denying your view of scripture, but are they denying God?
Because if evolution is true, we can use it to predict what intermediaries would look like.
I’ve discussed it in another thread and it has not be satisfactorily answered. Therefore, I stand by my original assertion.Take it to another thread. You asked and I told you how a Catholic understands it.
We know this as the Garden of Eden Fall. God gave man the power to preserve it or not.Then free will still could co-exist with a perfect design so forgive man for his transgression and keep the design perfect…no 80 year trial run needed.
Always a good idea to discount failure.Bradskii:![]()
Dover is not really worth arguing anyway.Uh? Don’t pretend that you don’t know the details. It was confirmed that ID was nothing more than creationism (with the funny hat and false nose). Hell’s teeth, you know this as a FACT.
Was it the tiny number of scientists who acceppt the view of the DI. Impressive!Bradskii:![]()
I have, over and over. Go back and read…Can we have your criteria for making that claim?
edwest:![]()
Then free will still could co-exist with a perfect design so forgive man for his transgression and keep the design perfect…no 80 year trial run needed.Free will exists in Heaven. That’s why some angels fell.
Not in the apologetics subforum, but the title seems appropriateCatholics have the full truth and should never be ashamed to proclaim it! However, at the same time, we must recognize the humanity in those who hold different beliefs than us and always approach concerns with Christ-like love and compassion. Definitely easier said than done!
Yet again…not the question I asked. I didn’t ask if they are arguing against your fundamental interpretation of scripture. I asked they are denying God.Bradskii:![]()
By definition they do not deny God. You should know this. They have to diss Scripture and Tradition to hold their view.They sure as all get out are denying your view of scripture, but are they denying God?
Vonsalza:![]()
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bwe9YHPCYAAKRhT.jpgBecause if evolution is true, we can use it to predict what intermediaries would look like.
Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,That’s it! I’ve got some photos too. Can’t find them at the moment…
Here is the statement I made that I have not received a satisfactory response:We know this as the Garden of Eden Fall. God gave man the power to preserve it or not.
It only takes one.Was it the tiny number of scientists who acceppt the view of the DI. Impressive!
No, a theistic evo does not deny God.So are they?
Yeah… this is what we mean when we say macroevolution .That’s it! I’ve got some photos too. Can’t find them at the moment…
![]()
As macroevolution is something employed by the ID crowd, it aids your critics in further associating the concept with nonsense.edwest:![]()
Yeah… this is what we mean when we say macroevolution .That’s it! I’ve got some photos too. Can’t find them at the moment…
![]()
![]()
Sometimes it’s fun to be foolishTechno2000:![]()
Vonsalza:![]()
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bwe9YHPCYAAKRhT.jpgBecause if evolution is true, we can use it to predict what intermediaries would look like.Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,That’s it! I’ve got some photos too. Can’t find them at the moment…
You are aware this term has been around since the 1930’s and coined by an evo. The evo’s tried to downplay this as they do not like it, for obvious reasons. You do not either. Evo’s are desperate to couple micro and macro together. They fail to consider the designed in limitations of organisms. They have to now though. So do you.As macroevolution is something employed by the ID crowd,