Matt Collins:
Actually, the Church’s teaching is that marriage is all about the unity and mutual support of the spouses, AS WELL AS the procreation and education of children. This is why couples must have a serious reason for practicing NFP. A reason that is not selfish. As Fr. Emil, of Our Lady of Perpetual Responsibility in Lake Wobegon says, “If you didn’t want to go to Chicago, why did you get on the train?”
And a clarification: It was Newbie_222 who had the vasectomy, not Frogman80.
Thanks for the clarification on who had the vasectomy, and my apologies, frogman80.
I would not disagree, necessarily, with what you said here about church teaching, but again, the question is about being open to, vs. actively seeking. Certainly marriage is oriented toward procreation and education of children as well as the unity and mutual support of the spouses. That does not mean that the couple must have children, or be actively seeking to have children, to be in a valid marriage, or to be following church teaching.
What I’m saying is that OP does not have to
want children to be following church teaching. In a way, this is similar to marriage, itself. The romance may be (hypothetically!!!) gone from my marriage, but I am still to stay with, and married to, my wife! As with all things, this is not a perfect analogy, but as so many have noted in other posts, it is not necessarily about
our wants or desires, other than the desire to serve the Lord.
Now, yes, there are other indicators about being opposed to, or actively trying to prevent, conception. Yes, if a couple is never intimate, they are not being open to life. Yes, if a man has a vasectomy, he is not being open to life. But, does he need to reverse a vasectomy that he had when he was unaware of the law? Would it cause him a hardship? Or would it be a simple matter?
And, of course, if the OP absolutely refuses to have children, and is completely opposed to having them, to the point of saying “No, I am not open to having children, even if we could become pregnant. Not that I just don’t want to have children, but I vehemently want to not have children,” then, that, again, is something else.