WikiLeaks Drops Proof That NYTimes Colluded With Hillary Clinton

  • Thread starter Thread starter Theo520
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
7_Sorrows said:
Where would we be without Wikileaks?!
Click to expand...
From the catechism:

1753 A good intention (for example, that of helping one’s neighbor) does not make behavior that is intrinsically disordered, such as lying and calumny, good or just. The end does not justify the means. Thus the condemnation of an innocent person cannot be justified as a legitimate means of saving the nation. On the other hand, an added bad intention (such as vainglory) makes an act evil that, in and of itself, can be good (such as almsgiving).39

Think about what you are saying. Maybe when you are feeling better.
 
Last edited:
Will you feel the same way if Wikileaks decides they don’t like Trump and start publishing unflattering things about him?
 
sallybutler said:
Will you feel the same way if Wikileaks decides they don’t like Trump and start publishing unflattering things about him?
Click to expand...
I certainly would. So far there is nothing from wiki leaks that has been found untruthful.
 
Boatswain2PA said:
So far there is nothing from wiki leaks that has been found untruthful.
Click to expand...
Email shows New York Times handed over Cablegate’s publication schedule to the US government (without telling @WikiLeaks) giving the State Department, then headed by Hillary Clinton, up to 9 days in advance to spin the revelations or create diversions
Click to expand...
This information is false on a couple of counts. See post #18. Can you find any evidence for the diversions?

The emails that they steal may be authentic, but the spin on them in this case is made up stuff.
 
Last edited:
sallybutler said:
Will you feel the same way if Wikileaks decides they don’t like Trump and start publishing unflattering things about him?
Click to expand...
Heck, we don’t have to wonder. She would call it fake news and then listen to what Rush and Sean tell her to believe about it, like she does with real stories about Trump.
 
sallybutler said:
Will you feel the same way if Wikileaks decides they don’t like Trump and start publishing unflattering things about him?
Click to expand...
Trump is doing that all by himself. Wikileaks could only provide icing for the cake.
 
Jig_Saw said:
Heck, we don’t have to wonder. She would call it fake news and then listen to what Rush and Sean tell her to believe about it, like she does with real stories about Trump.
Click to expand...
And we can take that statement to the bank and draw some interest on it.
 
LOL, Ha nothing to see here! Nope nothing at all!

You Dems are so funny, Now that Shrillary is an open festering wound for your glorious party she is thrown aside and it is pronounced far and wide that, “She is not the party… She is not the party!”

Classic…!
 
Imdaman said:
She is not the party… She is not the party!”
Click to expand...
Except, no one said that.
What was discussed was the situation in 2010, which is the time of the falsely claimed collusion.
Is it really hard to grasp that difference?
 
Oh yes good rebuttal.

"All this happened in 2010, so it is obviously fake! No way did it continue in 2016 no chance at all…!
 
dvdjs said:
TracyH:
Do you want to see the corruption in the United States Government brought to its knees?
Click to expand...
I support the advancement of the honesty and integrity of all. In the government and out.
Click to expand...
We haven’t seen much honesty and integrity the last 8 years with the Obama administration, Hillary and the DNC that is for sure, but they are irrationally outraged
at Trump!
 
Jig_Saw said:
40.png
sallybutler:
Will you feel the same way if Wikileaks decides they don’t like Trump and start publishing unflattering things about him?
Click to expand...
Heck, we don’t have to wonder. She would call it fake news and then listen to what Rush and Sean tell her to believe about it, like she does with real stories about Trump.
Click to expand...
Wikileaks is helping the American people see what rotten apples are in our government.
Right now, they are mainly democrats. I think if they had damaging information on the
republicans they felt the American people needed to know they would not hesitate
releasing it.
 
7_Sorrows said:
Wikileaks is helping the American people see what rotten apples are in our government.

Right now, they are mainly democrats. I think if they had damaging information on the

republicans they felt the American people needed to know they would not hesitate

releasing it.
Click to expand...
Yes, they are non-partisan, not a GOP tool.
 
Imdaman said:
"All this happened in 2010, so it is obviously fake! No way did it continue in 2016 no chance at all…!
Click to expand...
No one has made any such rebuttal. Try to avoid making htings up.
What happened in 2010 was the NYT publishing information gained through WikiLeaks that was embarrassing to the administration and to HRC. It can be said that that continued into 2016.

As the NYT was publishing sensitive materials it worked with DoS to be sure that assests were not compromised. WL was part of that process.

If you have evidence for “collusion” in 2016, bring it forward. But this story is not it, in any way, shape, or for.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top