C
Cristiano
Guest
Do you know who is your father?Such as?
Do you know who is your father?Such as?
Exactly. Why does God have to “suffer” the scrutiny of your if-I-don’t-see-it-it-doesn’t-exist mind, whereas I’m sure there’s lots of things (true or false) that you swallow hook, line, and sinker?But you still base you life believing a zillion things that you are not able to prove.
…bolding by me…Um, no. You are the one who believes in something that cannot be proven. (That is faith) I am the one who disbelieves in something that cannot be proven.
I’m not sure what the principle of noncontradiction is, but my intent when I asked people not to psychoanalyze me was to keep people on the question, and to avoid people telling me that I’m angry at God and such.By the way it sounds like you are begging to have your ideas and behaviors analyzed because you start your argument going against the principle of non contradiction.
Well you have rejected God there really isn’t much more to say - you’ve made your choice - I can’t say what your judgement will be - hopefully God’s mercy exceeds all imagination.I am an atheist. I was raised a Catholic, but recently stopped believing in God because of intellectual objections (which are a topic for another discussion, not this one). I still am a moral person, and my behavior hasn’t changed since I stopped believing. Most of my friends still think that I am Catholic, because the only change in my behavior that could possibly tip them off is that I no longer go to mass. So my question is, if I am wrong about Catholicism, do you believe that it is possible for a former-Catholic atheist who lives a moral life to get into heaven?
Oh, and one last thing: please don’t try to psychoanalyze me. I am not asking this because I’m afraid of hell (I don’t even believe it exists) and I do not secretly believe in God and am not secretly angry at him. Let’s stick to the relevant topic please!
Fatima is an excellent question, and my answer to you is that I can’t explain it. It really does seem to be an example of a real miracle. However, the miracles at Fatima by themselves do not convince me that the Christian God exists, because while they do appear to be supernatural in origin, they don’t answer any of the objections I have about the existence of God (e.g. the problem of evil). It’s also possible that there is a perfectly naturalistic explanation for them that we just don’t know about. Maybe something about the human mind that allows so many people to see the same illusion, or maybe even some aliens with very advanced technology were having a bit of fun at our expense (I certainly am not saying that I believe this, I’m just trying to illustrate a point that Fatima by itself does not prove God. It’s a piece of evidence in his favor, but not, in my mind, enough to give an unequivocal answer.).…bolding by me…
Well now that is just grasping at semantic straws.
You must believe in something that cannot be proven…? Who do rely on for the proof? Surely not yourself in all cases. Also, I’d love to hear you explain Fatima to me. I have never proposed this to an atheist before, so It is an honest question.
I just Wikipedia’d it. Holy cow…good luck. Kind of makes sense though.I’m not sure what the principle of noncontradiction is, but my intent when I asked people not to psychoanalyze me was to keep people on the question, and to avoid people telling me that I’m angry at God and such.
I hope that you don’t really mean that it’s beyond your imagining for God to accept someone like me - a lack of belief is really not that terrible a sinWell you have rejected God there really isn’t much more to say - you’ve made your choice - I can’t say what your judgement will be - hopefully God’s mercy exceeds all imagination.
Good. Thank you. So you believe in something (or acknowlege its existence) that cannot be explained. The pysical reality is not the only reality.Fatima is an excellent question, and my answer to you is that I can’t explain it. It really does seem to be an example of a real miracle. However, the miracles at Fatima by themselves do not convince me that the Christian God exists, because while they do appear to be supernatural in origin, they don’t answer any of the objections I have about the existence of God (e.g. the problem of evil). It’s also possible that there is a perfectly naturalistic explanation for them that we just don’t know about. Maybe something about the human mind that allows so many people to see the same illusion, or maybe even some aliens with very advanced technology were having a bit of fun at our expense (I certainly am not saying that I believe this, I’m just trying to illustrate a point that Fatima by itself does not prove God. It’s a piece of evidence in his favor, but not, in my mind, enough to give an unequivocal answer.).
I acknowledge the existence of things that cannot be explained yet. There may be a day when we know just what happened at Fatima. Maybe we’ll find out it was God. Maybe we’ll find out it was mass hysteria. Maybe we’ll find out it was aliens. Maybe we’ll find out it was all a fabrication. I have no idea. It does not necessarily mean that the physical reality is not the only reality. It means that there’s something we can’t explain, and one of the hypotheses put forward to explain it is supernatural intervention.Good. Thank you. So you believe in something (or acknowlege its existence) that cannot be explained. The pysical reality is not the only reality.
Evil is the result of our free will. Nothing more. Are ducks evil? No. they are perfect the way they are because God created them that way without free will. God loves us above all to give us free will, with which we can choose to serve Him (after seeking Him and finding Him of course) or not. “I’m a good person…bla bla bla” does not cut it! Not even for people who believe in God. You have morals and a conscience because God gave them to you. You can love because he first loved you.
bolding by meI acknowledge the existence of things that cannot be explained yet. There may be a day when we know just what happened at Fatima. Maybe we’ll find out it was God. Maybe we’ll find out it was mass hysteria. Already proven not to be. Maybe we’ll find out it was aliens. I love Star Trek, too! Maybe we’ll find out it was all a fabrication. **Already proven not to be **I have no idea. It does not necessarily mean that the physical reality is not the only reality.Yes, actually it does. Our Lady did appear to those 3 kids. Not physical, but reality. It means that there’s something we can’t explain, and one of the hypotheses put forward to explain it is supernatural intervention. As for the problem of evil, that’s not something I want to get into on this thread, since there are a lot of other threads out there on that specific topic, and it’s a whole can of worms that we don’t need to open here.
Certainly. If someone could present to me evidence or an argument that provides enough evidence for the existence of God then of course I would believe in him. As it stands though, I haven’t seen that evidence or heard that argument. So at least for now, I’ll live my life under the assumption that there is no God.bolding by me
So, maybe you don’t believe in God…yet? I hope so. I’m continuing on in this thread out of concern for you and all atheists.
I wish you well. I pray for you. I hope to see you in heaven. That means we will both have to get there!!Certainly. If someone could present to me evidence or an argument that provides enough evidence for the existence of God then of course I would believe in him. As it stands though, I haven’t seen that evidence or heard that argument. So at least for now, I’ll live my life under the assumption that there is no God.
just bumping my previous post down a bit, I think it got lost in the shuffle above!poseidon, I’m curious as to how you decided god doesn’t exist. were there certain books you read, or a particular argument someone posed to you?
as an aside, I believe it is up to the individual to determine *why *they believe what they believe. there are a lot of catholics who say they don’t agree with certain church teachings… but when asked why, they either “just know” the teachings are wrong, or they give a potentially logically sound argument that starts from a false premise, or they are arguing against something that isn’t actually what the teaching is!
I knew many people in college who were atheists because the idea that there could be a god was just too ridiculous to accept… but so was the idea for people a long time ago that the earth actually went around the sun. their not believing that didn’t make it any less trueand they all failed to see how that argument was intellectually dishonest.
psychoanalyzing aside your question is intellectually illogical.I am an atheist. I was raised a Catholic, but recently stopped believing in God because of intellectual objections …do you believe that it is possible for a former-Catholic atheist who lives a moral life to get into heaven?
Oh, and one last thing: please don’t try to psychoanalyze me. I am not asking this because I’m afraid of hell (I don’t even believe it exists) and I do not secretly believe in God and am not secretly angry at him. Let’s stick to the relevant topic please!
The thing is, Poseidon, that if there is a God, then He is infinitely superior to everything. Now, while it is nice that you want to know for sure if there is a God, this God, if He exists makes the rules. Why? Because he made you and everything. So why then would He require “faith” as the prerequisite for being in Him or with Him? Because it is with faith that one can bridge the gap between our reason and who He is. If God can be explained prefectly by reason and science, there would be no difference between Him and the things He had created now, would there?I’m not going to belittle the contribution of many Catholics to science - Copernicus, Mendel, whoever that priest who came up with the big bang was, Galileo, and plenty of others. My point was that faith is not a valid “way of knowing.” As in, if someone tells me that they know something to be true simply because they have “faith” that it is true, I’m not going to be convinced of it. If they can show me evidence (reason and science) and the evidence is compelling, I’ll accept it.
Because atheism (not accepting the claim that any gods exist) is the default position: for any claim, the default is not to accept the claim until there is sufficient evidence for the claim.Why should atheism triumph over theism when you can’t prove either, as you don’t seem to believe in anything without empirical evidence of its existence.
No, actually.Aah… here’s the rub. Caught up in medieval depictions of what “suffering” in hell means, are we?
This is a massive side-step of the issue.Let’s talk a little bit about what hell is, and then I think your argument about ‘rejection’ and ‘punishment’ will go away. Hell is simply this: an eternity spent without God and even without the hope of God. Now, what people will do in hell is another thing altogether, but the upshot is that if you really reject God, then you are requesting to spend eternity without Him.