B
bibleguy180
Guest
Someone told me there will be. Which I suppose makes sense, since Mary, Jesus, Enoch, and Elijah still have their bodies. Right? Or am I wrong? Is there an official Church teaching?
Oh, I see. You mean an object that is established and perceived by God and perceived by men. But what is meant by adding the word “material”?Maybe, like a shirt?
jd
See, now this is interesting (and it’s why I asked the question). I’ve rarely heard a discrete definition of “material”, only intuitive ones. But intuitive definitions all fall prey to epistemological traps, like those of Berkeley.Technically, the definition of “material” is “having parts”. Simple substances which are not divisible are immaterial. Anything which is divisible is material.
Yes, but what qualifies them as the “exact same”? Not the atoms, of course. The arrangement of atoms? At what moment in time? The DNA? But this changes too. It seems that we’re looking for the “form” of the body here, but then again the form of the body would be a simple: the soul. Ah, perplexity!The Church is very clear that our resurrected bodies will be real material bodies (in fact, the exact same bodies we had while on earth).
Are you sure about this? So I’ll be able to sip merlot and get 18 holes in on pebble beach before I worship God in person?We should be able to eat if we desire, taste a good wine or even go horseback riding if you like. The boundries of Heaven are without limit.
.
If I recall correctly, the definition of matter as “having parts” was first Aristotle’s, or at least I think that is were I picked it up. I don’t think that it does follow that two immaterial things could be combined into a material thing, for anything that is capable of being substantially unitied in the manner we are talking of, would also be capable of being divided. This definition is certainly not meant to resemble structure of monads in any sense (sorry Leibniz)!Having parts, eh? It follows that two immaterial things, combined, makes a material thing? That is a strange conclusion. (Sounds like Leibniz, in fact).
That is, of course, a perfectly valid question and one which the Church has not yet defined.Yes, but what qualifies them as the “exact same”? Not the atoms, of course. The arrangement of atoms? At what moment in time? The DNA? But this changes too. It seems that we’re looking for the “form” of the body here, but then again the form of the body would be a simple: the soul. Ah, perplexity!
Your wrong. Jesus is a vegetarian, and you know it!Yes, our bodies will be reunited with us in Heaven, they will be the same bodies we had here on earth but, glorified. Meaning we will, in Heaven, possess the life, body included, that we were always meant to have. There will be no horseback riding, only praising God, LOL! But, the book of revelation also shows how the angels had trumpets, seals, an incense thing, and also an altar in front of God.
Oh, and Jesus said that he had a house and it has many rooms, lol, so, we might be staying in a sweet mansion for all eternity, chilling in the pool with the Holy Ghost while Jesus grills burgers and the Father gets a nice tan!
I want to live across the hall from JP2 and Mother Angelica:thumbsup: LOL
Does this mean that the Aristotelian is committed to the claim that matter is infinitely divisible?If I recall correctly, the definition of matter as “having parts” was first Aristotle’s, or at least I think that is were I picked it up. I don’t think that it does follow that two immaterial things could be combined into a material thing, for anything that is capable of being substantially unitied in the manner we are talking of, would also be capable of being divided.
Even in this life material objects exist primarily in our mind! We infer that they exist from our perceptions but we have direct knowledge only of our inner experiences. All the most important aspects of existence are intangible: truth, goodness, freedom, justice, beauty and love. Material objects are important but less important than spiritual realities. The Resurrection indicates that the entire universe will be glorified like the body of Christ. How can heaven lack the wonder and beauty that exists on earth - and in time and space?Someone told me there will be. Which I suppose makes sense, since Mary, Jesus, Enoch, and Elijah still have their bodies. Right? Or am I wrong? Is there an official Church teaching?
Committed insofar as defending that definition, I should think so. I haven’t read enough of Aristotle’s works on the natural sciences to know what he thinks of atomism. Certainly the notion of an atom, or base particle which was not divisible was around at at his time, and he probably comments on it one way or another, I am just not familiar with it myself.Does this mean that the Aristotelian is committed to the claim that matter is infinitely divisible?
Perhaps, after all of the covetousness on this earth, we will finally see material as being God’s rather as ours.St. Augustine’s conclusion was that material things are in heaven, but no matter where we look we see God in them. As a side topic … it leads me to think that what we call “material” really isn’t what the word has come to mean. In other words, if everything which is material is infused with God’s presence (even at the atomic level or in the energy that binds material objects) then why not have material objects in heaven? I had never thought about that before.