J
The act of creation is temporal. God is temporal too if God is His act. Therefore the concept of God cannot resolve the problem of beginning of time since God Himself is subjected to time.In this video I understand that Dr. Craig thinks that by creating the universe, then God has gone from timeless to temporal. Is this consistent with Catholic teaching or is it open to interpretation?
Nope. The act of creation is eternal. The created universe, however, has a temporal dimension.The act of creation is temporal.
Invalid conclusion, due to invalid premises.Therefore the concept of God cannot resolve the problem of beginning of time since God Himself is subjected to time.
I get a “video restricted” error when I attempt to play it, so I can only take your word for it. Somehow, though, I doubt Craig asserts that God is temporal. At best, the Christian perspective might be that the Incarnate Son of God, in his human person, becomes part of the universe and is therefore temporal.In this video I understand that Dr. Craig thinks that by creating the universe, then God has gone from timeless to temporal.
I am mostly through the video and Craig is explicit about God choosing to abandon a timeless mode of existence and enter into a temporal mode of existence by choosing to create and maintain relationships with his creatures. He asserts that God’s timelessness is not essential to God. This is clearly about the Divine Essence and he’s not just thinking of the Incarnation. In fact, it seems he also denies God’s immutability, stating that God’s choice to create “liberates” him from a static mode of existence (which is how he sees timelessness).JJO:![]()
I get a “video restricted” error when I attempt to play it, so I can only take your word for it. Somehow, though, I doubt Craig asserts that God is temporal. At best, the Christian perspective might be that the Incarnate Son of God, in his human person, becomes part of the universe and is therefore temporal.In this video I understand that Dr. Craig thinks that by creating the universe, then God has gone from timeless to temporal.
No. The act of creation is obviously temporal. No universe then universe. This is a temporal process.Nope. The act of creation is eternal. The created universe , however, has a temporal dimension.
Creatures are temporal.Gorgias:![]()
No. The act of creation is obviously temporal. No universe then universe. This is a temporal process.Nope. The act of creation is eternal. The created universe , however, has a temporal dimension.
Was there a point that only God existed?Creatures are temporal.
There was never a time when there was no universe.
There was no point in time at which only God existed.Wesrock:![]()
Was there a point that only God existed?Creatures are temporal.
There was never a time when there was no universe.
I didn’t ask if there was a point in time. I asked if there was a point. How could you possibly define creation if there was no point that only God existed?There was no point in time at which only God existed.
Creation can be seen as the giving of being to other things by God, as all creatures being dependent on God for their being. It’s this dependency that separates Creator from creature.Wesrock:![]()
I didn’t ask if there was a point in time. I asked if there was a point. How could you possibly define creation if there was no point that only God existed?There was no point in time at which only God existed.
That didn’t address my point. If there was no point that only God existed, then the universe exists eternally as well. There must be a point that only God exist. God then creates, then there is creation. There are two points in the act of creation.Creation can be seen as the giving of being to other things by God, as all creatures being dependent on God for their being. It’s this dependency that separates Creator from creature.
Why? There is no need for the universe to have existed for infinite time, it had a beginning and it is dependent on something else for that beginning and its very being now.Wesrock:![]()
That didn’t address my point. If there was no point that only God existed, then the universe exists eternally as well.Creation can be seen as the giving of being to other things by God, as all creatures being dependent on God for their being. It’s this dependency that separates Creator from creature.
Why not and/both?Is God Temporal or Timeless?
That is how I see the problem. There are two states of affair: 1) God only exists and 2) God and the universe exist. If you say that there was no point that only God existed, excluding the first option, then it follows that the second option is the only possible option which means that God and the universe exist together. Therefore, the universe is eternal as well. That is true since it must be a point that there was no universe if you believe in act of creation. And it follows that there must be only God at that point since there was no universe.Why?
Point of or in what?there was no point that only God existed
Read point as a state of affair.Point of or in what?