no Amy, we do not argue with you for the sake of it…there are flaws in your arguments, and we are pointing them out.
First of all, of course it’s not a prohibition. This was the first step TOWARDS a prohibition.
that’s because you have a priori belief that it is progressive. Yet, if you take the verse by itself, it by no means hints at prohibiting alcohol. When i tell you that something is both good and bad, it is the best way to teach you HOW to consume that thing otherwise i do NOT mention the benefit.
the next verse prohibit it in the context of prayer. Again, no progression since it has nothing to do with the first verse that mentions benefits, and these benefits can be assume before prayer.
Secondly, it is NOT about the amount, because it doesn’t say it’s about the amount. That is only your assumption and interpretation, which is not backed up by textual analysis. Regardless of the amount, the harm outweighs the benefit
. this makes no sense. So in WHAT WAY is it beneficial?
Again, your interpretation only.
i asked a simple question : how can Allah say wine has benefits, and then call it the work of satan? did all the prophets and people who drank before follow satan’s work?
You answered : satan uses what is good and turns it into bad or something of the like. To which i replied : he can he turn it into bad UNLESS by excess if alcohol per se can be neneficial? in what way can it be beneficial?
these are very simple and logical questions.