Gurney,
**You and Cinette had written: *****Cinette: *
You should join either-or because you also have lots of theological problems. So, unless you decide to study and learn about the teachings of the Catholic Church there is no point staying is there?
***Gurney: **What in the heck kind of comment is this? I have theological problems? Well thank you Mrs. Aquinas for your critique! I’m glad you’re so level-headed and full of the depths of theological genius.
Do you seriously think I haven’t studied the teachings of the Catholic Church? You don’t even know me and haven’t read my posts or know my story, journey. How dare you sit on your high horse and make an accusation that I would leave the Church with scarcely caring or studying the theology of the Catholic faith. How dare you! You haven’t a clue about me or what I have struggled with. My wife and I have been in a real struggle to stay Catholic for years. I deeply resent your cavalier, snobby post. Put me on ignore or don’t reply if you’re going to cop attitude like that.
If you had any Catholicism in you, you would want me to stay and pray for me, and speak to me with some charity and well-wishes. Shame on you…*
I suspect that Cinette did not understand “where you were coming from”, and that she was not exercising arrogance or ill will, really. It is hard to remain patient in these kinds of exchanges when feelings run so high.
Although many C.A. Forum contributors live in places where the Church, locally, is flourishing, I suspect that more Catholics, myself included, live in dioceses wracked with the corruption and licence that have flourished since the Second Vatican Council and especially since the arrival of the
Novus Ordo liturgical “reform” in 1970, both of which even Pope Paul VI, too late, realised were ill conceived. The result, now long overdue, is that perhaps a Council is needed to aright the abuses that have arisen from the wrong-headed implementation of the Second Vatican Council.
I live in one of those tainted dioceses and I only came to the Catholic Church because I believe that it is Christ’s True Church, despite the theological, sexual, liturgical and other kinds of slovenliness that run amok in the Church (apart from the Eastern Orthodox Churches and the Eastern Catholic part of the Catholic Church, which, for their part, have not suffered appreciably from the decline that has overtaken all of the churches, denominations, and sects of the Christian West, the Roman Catholic Church included).
If Pope Benedict XVI (and the organs of the Vatican)

cannot clean up the muddle

that the Church is in now, one hopes, if that really is the right thing to do, that a new Council will be called, as the Council of Trent earlier had been summoned, to address reform of the corruptions that had set into the Catholic Church at the time of the Renaissance and which, again, are so rampant in our times. We may need a Counter-Reform to Vatican II (to make clear what is legitimate in that Council’s name and what definitely is not!), with or without such a council, a new Counter-Reformation to the abuses of the liberal diocesan and national establishments within so much of the Catholic Church, to do much of what, somewhat similarly, the Council of Trent and ensuing Counter-Reformation did in its era to reform the abuses that had run rampant when the tragedy of the Protestant Reformation came along. (Forgive the mile-long and complicated sentences to express something this comples! Also, I am really going out on a far limb, as a layman, in saying this, but it is my conviction; if I am wrong, I know that somehow I shall be made to know that.) Whatever the complacent “liberals” within the Catholic Church may think to the contrary, the Second Vatican Council is not necessarily the last General Council that the Church has needed or that things will go along as they have been indefinitely! The Church, as needed, will have as many future Councils to set things aright as needed, till Christ returns in Glory and history comes to an end to make place for God’s own way for all eternity.
The problem, Gurney, is that all of the Western Church (Catholic, Protestant, Anglican, sectarian) is a terrible mess. There are abuses and decay all over the Protestant and sectarian groups, too, so leaving the Catholic Church really is no solution. It may take some time to learn this, to “interiorise” this sad fact, and I understand that. I was “at the end of my tether” before I knew that the solution is not outside the Church, where other Christian groups are awash in problems (though, like certain good Catholic dioceses, not always on the local level), but reform has to come from within the Church, not from outside it. Having gone through the various streams of Anglicanism. Lutheranism (and even “etc.” to some extent), hoping to find an alternative to the messy post-Vatican II Catholic Church, I simply came to an halt and confessed that any path outside the Catholic Church is the wrongest of them all! May God bless you as you learn to cope with living in troubled times! And pray for the Roman Catholic Church, rather than to attack it in ways that are not really productive. As for me, I am in the Church and hanging on tenaciously, trying to nourish a spiritual life within a diocese, from what I can observe, that does not care much for that kind of thing, but I am in this “for the long haul” and I pray that eventually you, too, will be back in the Church the same way!
Pax, Jerry Parker