D
Della
Guest
This is true. Differences in doctrinal beliefs are not insults. What is insulting is those Protestants who go out of their way to portray Mary as a clueless interfering busybody whose Son insulted her in public in order to “prove” he didn’t “need” her any more. Yes, that’s the mind set I saw and still see from some Protestants.You think because Protestants don’t believe the Marian doctrines that this is somehow an insult to Mary? Like most Protestants, I don’t think that Mary remained ever Virgin, was without sin, and was bodily assumed into heaven, but this doesn’t mean that I am insulting Mary. Mary is the Mother of God, forever blessed, and is a Saint in Heaven as we speak. Let’s not confuse differences in doctrine with “insults” to Mary, because they are not the same thing.
In answer to that mind set we Catholics say: Our Lord doesn’t need to be “protected” from devotion for his own Mother. Catholic devotion in no way adds to or detracts from the glory due to Christ, her Son–nothing ever could or ever will do that. And if for one nano-second we Catholics thought so we’d never utter another Hail Mary again in our lives.
I’ve also noticed that the most virulent anti-Marianist actually know next to nothing about the Church’s teachings. Or worse, there are those who scan Church teachings about Mary, not to learn what the Church truly teaches, but to find phrases and out-of-context quotes to throw into Catholics’ faces as “proof” that the Church must be wrong. Once again I have to say it, that is truly, truly sad. And I would think any Protestant who loves Jesus would say so too. Yes?
Then Luther and Calvin and other of the reformers insulted her, too! What’s sad is the lack of knowledge many Protestants have about beliefs of the founders of their own denominations/of Protestantism in general.It’s insulting to her when men claim for her perpetual virginity and deny her her other children. It’s insulting when men claim her to be sinless when she herself adored God her Savior. It’s insulting to her when men exalt her to Queen status in Heaven when no Divine coronation was ever recorded. Such things, dear Della, ARE insulting to her since there is no Divinely revealed proof of ANY of these claims predicated of her by men. This is what is sad, truly sad.
And what is also truly sad is Protestants who don’t know or care to know the difference between doctrine and dogma, devotion and pious belief, but lump everything together into one package to be rejected out of hand simply because they either were not brought up to believe them and/or practice them or because they cannot/will not accept what they really know little about.
The reasons why the Church teaches what it does about Mary are sound for they exult Christ first and foremost, as anyone who has looked into them for himself with an open mind knows.
Also, they spring from Sacred Tradition out of which the NT came and which the Church has believed/practiced for centuries before the reformation. The Church has the primacy of place in history and reason. It is up to Protestants to prove the Church wrong–by careful examination of what the Church teaches not by simply declaring that what the Church teaches cannot be true.