vern humphrey:
The question is, what should the witness do/have done? And the answer is, there’s nothing he could have done. According to the story as he tells it, husband and wife left together.
Yes, the fact that the woman waited by the car and then left with the man is very telling. For me it would depend on various things. For instance, if I knew the couple.
If I knew the couple and I knew the situation habitually got a lot worse at home behind closed doors and that the woman was complicit, then I would likely bellow at the woman that she can leave any time she chooses to. And then get in my car and drive away.
If, added to this scenario, I knew there were children, I would call the police from my car and ask them to contact the youth bureau. Enough calls to the youth bureau will produce some dramatic changes. Children have a right to not be constant witnesses to this kind of bs.
If I knew that the woman was
not complicit, then I would bellow to the woman to run away. If she started running I would call 911. If the man started running after her, I would shout that the man had stolen my purse and I would shout for people to chase him (it’s worked before). If the man came after me I would get in my car and drive.
If I did not know the woman at all, I would ask loudly enough to be heard by all present “Do you need help?” If she says yes, well that’s a 911. If she hesitates, well that gets the question repeated. If she says no, then that gets a “Are you sure?” If she sneers at me, then I get in my car and shake the dust.
vern humphrey:
He could try to personally intervene – and wind up fighting both of them. And when the cops come, guess who gets arrested? (Hint: It won’t be the husband-and-wife tag team who claim they were attacked.)
I completely agree with you that generally there is a kind of complicity in these public brawls and that prying a woman lose from a man who redesigns the side of her face is not going to happen any time soon and in fact is going to be met with vigorous resistance – read violence.
However there
are exceptions to the rule of complicity.
By the way, even where women are kept virtually hostage in conditions where they are deprived of food, water, sleep, money, are forbidden contact with relatives, doctors, lawyers (of course), and are forcibly confined, locked up, subject to the usual things which I will not elucidate here, if a woman is determined to get free she will find a way.
Some of them die in the process, but some of them die for the lack of trying. Home torture is a terminal disease. Treat it as such.
I knew a woman who lived on a farm way out in the country. As often as she could, she would squirrel away a few dollars here, a few there, in different places. She hid her ID. She kept silent for years. Then she took all seven children and left. She’s OK now, working, kids grown up.
I think the most important thing for a witness to do is to go-zero and allow the situation to describe itself to you clearly. And then to calm one’s emotions and act rationally. Public brawls involve at least one party – most likely two parties if not more – who is(are) irrational. Adding your own irrational projections, fears, bitterness is not safe.
:tiphat: