Woman says Roy Moore initiated sexual encounter when she was 14, he was 32

  • Thread starter Thread starter lmachine
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
And she isn’t the woman who was 14 at the time of the molestation.

14 year old girls cannot consent relations with 32 year old men.
 
No one has a legal complaint here. The others were introduced to show a pattern of behavior.
 
Last edited:
But that’s okay, he’s a republican! And a righteous moral one at that
 
The 14 year old victim is not Debbie Gibson, it’s Leigh Corfman, a Republican voter. I think you should actually know what you’re talking about before trying to discuss these events as you obviously have no understanding of the players, timelines, or specifics.
 
lmachine said:
Moore has confirmed dating 16 year olds. If you’re the kind of man in his 30s who dates 16 year old girls I’m gonna go out on a limb and say it’s much more likely you molested that 14 year old than a man who doesn’t date teenage girls.
Click to expand...
That isn’t fair. My wife’s great grandfather’s and great grandmother’s age match up with those here. He wasn’t a molestor. Things were different back then, but that doesn’t mean men today who date women that much younger are molestors.
 
For those who are scoring at home, MonteRCMS, Danayaher and mgdspencer have all repeated the right wing talking point that one of Moore’s 4 (FOUR) accusers worked for a Democrat, so there you have it. Now we know the excuse the Republicans will use (fake news, blah, blah, blah) to excuse Moore.
 
Danayaher said:
Isn’t it surprising how they disappeared the moment they noticed they weren’t effective? What a huge coincidence, just like the fact that the allegations take place exactly before an ellection.
Click to expand...
And I suppose the threatened defamation of character lawsuit didn’t have anything to do with it?
 
Sure. :roll_eyes: Tell us what your standards are, then we can see about doubles standards.
 
Last edited:
Danayaher said:
I don’t think you understand your situation: the moment you paste in the text-box any URL that starts with “huffingtonpost”, you will lose any legitimacy.
Click to expand...
Alternatively, when you accuse 4 people of being “democratic woman that happens to come up with magical allegations”, you will similarly lose any legitimacy when the truth is otherwise.
 
Danayaher said:
Of course. Who would doubt of these democrats with so much evidence who happen to come out when democrats are about to lose bigly? Democrats would never do that. they have never done that. And those newspapers are completely unbiased. That is why I still Shill for Hill.

But anyway, I don’t see why anyone would listen to what you say when you are a child rapist (something that, following your logic, you will have to somehow prove to be false).
Click to expand...
Of course. The one accuser (the one who said that Moore was sexually abusing her when she was 14 and he was 32) voted for Republicans. But don’t let that get in the way of accusing others of losing their legitimacy.
 
Danayaher said:
Of course she voted for republicans. There is a lot of evidence of that. About as much as the evidence for the allegations.

I can make any accusations I like. After all, isn’t that what you defend? Something says it, so it must be true. Why complain about what I do when it is precisely what you so adamantly believe?
Click to expand...
Sure, you can make any allegations you like. But would your mother also say that you happened to be in the place where the allegations you make happen? Did you make the allegations to people many years ago privately so they remember you talking about it? Did other people face similar situations to you and make allegations that suggest a pattern with the person you are accusing?

But, again, don’t let facts get in the way of you accusing others of losing their legitimacy.
 
Danayaher said:
My mother, and many people to whom I talked to privately any years ago also told me you are a child rapist.

It doesn’t seem like you care about facts. Only about what sme people say. Let’s hope that, tomorrow, nobody says that it is good to throw yourself in a pit filled with razor blades, lest you be around to hear it.
Click to expand...
The difference, of course, is that the reporters talked to these people privately and they said that the story put forth by the accuser was something she brought up years ago, not that you claim these other people have said things they haven’t said.
 
Danayaher said:
Yes, I fully trust said reporters and what those people said, just before an ellection democrats are losing bigly. Because again, democrats are honest, good, principled people who would never do this, and the WP is a good, principle newspaper with good, principled journalists. And I trust them because there are vasts amount of evidence regarding their accusations.

By the way, you should send me some money. I’m a Saudi prince. I will return it to you, greatly multiplied.
Click to expand...
And somehow you accuse others of losing their legitimacy in this argument.
 
I think you need to take a deep breath. Moore isn’t the only man recently accused of this sort of conduct, and in the grand scheme of things, even if he loses his Senate bid, will still be in a better place than, say, Kevin Spacey or Harvey Weinstein.

It is amusing to watch people who have portrayed Bill Clinton as a drooling sex fiend, often by invoking unproven allegations, now suddenly defending Moore.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top