It wouldn’t matter if they were Eastern Catholics by the way. That wouldn’t be an excuse for what they appear to be doing wrong.
Correct. Eastern Catholic or not, it doesn’t excuse deliberate disobedience. It is a problem some Eastern Catholics face. When they inform the priest in advance and give sufficient time to verify the correct procedures, some Roman Catholic priests refuse to commune Eastern Catholic children. I know of a person who couldn’t find a priest within 30 miles who would commune her baby. While disobedient and not excusable, she would hold a small amount of the Precious Blood in her mouth and put it on her finger and commune the baby herself. When the priest refuses to do his job and denies a child his canonical rights, some parents feel that they have no other choices. They should address it with the bishop, then with the Eastern bishop, then with canon lawyers, and on up until change is effected. When looking at the passing time and a child being denied, it can be difficult to endure.
Then there are the people who think they have a right to everything and don’t have to follow proper procedures but can just take whatever pleases them, and instead of the hassle of getting the child prepared will just take it. So speculation on the woman’s motives are in vain.
I believe you are incorrect. It is the liturgical law of the Byzantine Church that prohibits all from receiving in the hand at the Divine Liturgy, not Canon Law. When a Latin Catholic attends the DL, s/he must receive in the mouth, due to the liturgical laws.
Incorrect. The Byzantine Typikon has the Eucharistic species, comingled, distributed on a spoon. As such, reception is on the tongue. The rubrics for the DL are not binding on the faithful, meaning they don’t have to receive that way when in a Roman Catholic Mass. They are binding on the Liturgy, meaning a priest offering a Divine Liturgy is bound to them, unless directed otherwise. Otherwise, all Roman Catholics could insist on receiving in the hand at a Divine Liturgy since their Mass rubrics allow for it. The rubrics don’t cover the people, but the service.
A Byzantine Catholic attending a Latin Mass would certainly have the option to receive in the hand, because they would be bound by the liturgical law of the Latin Mass.
Yes they could, but because the Mass is done according to the Latin rubrics, not because the people there are under Latin laws when present. Eastern Catholics attending Mass remain bound to their Eastern canons, such as fasting and days of observance. The people are bound to the canons. The services are bound to the rubrics.
Much in the same way, you cross yourself appropriate to the Rite you are attending in, not the Church you belong to, and you say or omit The Filioque based upon the Rite you are attending, not the Church you belong to.
While polite, neither of those are binding on the people.
As I understand, a byzantine who attends a latin church could receive communion, regardless of age. When children go through the RCIA they receive all of the sacraments at the same time regardless of age. If you have a 4 or 5 year old that goes through RCIA they receive communion, and continue to from there after.
Any confirmed person in a state of grace who presents himself for communion has a right to receive. Byzantine Catholic children fit the criteria. Some Latin priests continue to deny them communion in spite of this.
The young Byzantine Catholic would need to have been baptized
and have received first communion (and christmation.)
4 and 5 year olds would not go through RCIA.
They would go through RCIC. I think they should not be confirmed unless they’ve reached the age of reason, but they should be confirmed and then communed if they go through RCIC after the age of reason.