Woman who rammed pro-lifers with car was Catholic Relief Services employee

  • Thread starter Thread starter MHichborn
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

MHichborn

Guest
“Charisse Espy Glassman, was a Democrat candidate for the DC school board as well as a legislative assistant with CRS-Haiti. Despite assault charges, she remained at CRS until August 4th, 2011. In a statement on Facebook responding to queries, CRS said they had “operated on the principle that people are innocent until proven guilty.” A victim of the assault, who suffered two herniated disks, reported that Glassman had seemed to laugh as she drove into the crowd.”
lifesitenews.com/news/woman-who-rammed-pro-lifers-with-car-was-employee-of-catholic-relief-servic

This article points out FOUR CRS employees with pro-abortion/pro-contraception backgrounds. Could it be that the leadership of CRS is just now having to answer why it is giving so much money to pro-abortion/pro-contraception organizations and sitting on their boards and steering committees BECAUSE it is hiring people who come from organizations that support and promote such things?

Who in the world over at CRS vetted these people???
 
I would be careful with all the well-established charitable groups that have been around since the 1960’s. Not all of them, but many of them have become seriously corrupted. Chruch Militant TV did a great episode earlier in August on CRS. This place is very ripe for a massive cleanup operation. More importantly, donate nothing to this group. They will change when the money dries up. Till then, they will trot out the same old speeches and handwaving maneuvers.

Have you visited “reform CCHD now”? What a mess.
 
lifesitenews.com/news/woman-who-rammed-pro-lifers-with-car-was-employee-of-catholic-relief-servic

This article points out FOUR CRS employees with pro-abortion/pro-contraception backgrounds. Could it be that the leadership of CRS is just now having to answer why it is giving so much money to pro-abortion/pro-contraception organizations and sitting on their boards and steering committees BECAUSE it is hiring people who come from organizations that support and promote such things?

Who in the world over at CRS vetted these people???
This seems odd. People who worked for CRS are supporting contraception and injuring pro-lifers?
 
Yes indeed. When you see how the major charitable groups have been infiltrated and subverted, it is quite amazing.

With Obama being the most flagrant pro-abortion president ever, would you be surprised if he was invited to an annual dinner by USCCB president Timothy Dolan?

We have a lot of work to do.
 
I don’t trust anything that isn’t the Catholic Church itself. Anything can be called Catholic and anything can be “sponsored” by the Church yet be running itself. I give my money to my Parish because I know it’ll go to a good place. Whether it stays at the Parish or goes out to approved donations I leave it up to the Parish to decide.
 
Yes indeed. When you see how the major charitable groups have been infiltrated and subverted, it is quite amazing.

With Obama being the most flagrant pro-abortion president ever, would you be surprised if he was invited to an annual dinner by USCCB president Timothy Dolan?

We have a lot of work to do.
👍

Catholics in North America have to fight for their Church like never before. Christ promised that the gates of hell would never prevail against His Church… he didn’t say anything about the Church surviving in a particular country or continent… 😦
 
Yes indeed. When you see how the major charitable groups have been infiltrated and subverted, it is quite amazing.

With Obama being the most flagrant pro-abortion president ever, would you be surprised if he was invited to an annual dinner by USCCB president Timothy Dolan?

We have a lot of work to do.
His Eminence has already answered criticism for the invite. Every election cycle both candidates are invited to the dinner, when I find the link to His Eminences blog I will post it 🙂
 
So mad about this because I used to give CRS a good, healthy donation every year or during a major tragedy. I know they do good work in areas where people need the most yelp, but how can I support a charity that helps one group of people while supporting the genocide of another (the unborn)?

Anyone know of a Catholic charity that does emergency services like CRS that isn’t tied to pro-abortion groups?
 
So mad about this because I used to give CRS a good, healthy donation every year or during a major tragedy. I know they do good work in areas where people need the most yelp, but how can I support a charity that helps one group of people while supporting the genocide of another (the unborn)?

Anyone know of a Catholic charity that does emergency services like CRS that isn’t tied to pro-abortion groups?
Just playing devils advocate, but is CRS necessarily pro choice. These employees might just happen to be pro choice.
 
So mad about this because I used to give CRS a good, healthy donation every year or during a major tragedy. I know they do good work in areas where people need the most yelp, but how can I support a charity that helps one group of people while supporting the genocide of another (the unborn)?

Anyone know of a Catholic charity that does emergency services like CRS that isn’t tied to pro-abortion groups?
Caritas does work itself and funds other Catholic Services that are in line with the teaching of the Magisterium that do work that it doesn’t
 
Wouldn’t this be considered “old news”? The headline refers to an incident that happened in January 2011.

I’m generally skeptical of LSN. What reputable news source runs a piece based solely on their ability to surf LinkedIn for incriminating associations?
 
Wouldn’t this be considered “old news”? The headline refers to an incident that happened in January 2011.

I’m generally skeptical of LSN. What reputable news source runs a piece based solely on their ability to surf LinkedIn for incriminating associations?
There are lots of articles and news publications that refer back to old information when they find something new. How many news outlets referred to George Bush’s reading of the goat story during the 9-11 attacks as far as 6 or 7 years after the fact, whenever they ran a piece calling his competence into question? This kind of story is not unusual, especially given that A) LSN is actively investigating and reporting on Catholic Relief Services’ funding and partnership practices, and B) this is new information on a story that LSN reported on that is relevant to its mission … reporting on matters pertaining to the war on Life. Would you be as skeptical if the revelation pointed out that Glassman worked for Mitt Romney, rather than working for CRS? The story would be no more or less relevant.

As for the linkedin reference … when someone puts their curriculum vitae online, it becomes a source of public knowledge, and therefore will be used by researchers. But the article went well beyond linkedin.
 
Caritas has its own special set of issues.
What I found interesting is that the new guidelines that the Vatican issued for Catholic charities it says, "From now on, all Caritas Internationalis statements — particularly “any text with doctrinal or moral content or orientations” — and activities will have to be authorized in advance by the Vatican, except in case of “grave humanitarian emergencies.”
“Cor Unum” will also appoint an ecclesiastical assistant tasked with promoting the “Catholic identity” of Caritas Internationalis, and the Vatican’s Secretariat of State will closely supervise the confederation’s contacts with foreign governments.** "**

It was said that that the new rules would not directly affect Catholic Relief Services. ***“But Cardinal Robert Sarah, president of the pontifical council, explained in L’Osservatore Romano, the Vatican’s semiofficial newspaper, that bishops could be “inspired” by the new rules to revise the statutes of national Catholic charities.” ***And CRS has done that. They have incorporated into their mission statement:
“As a part of the Universal Church, Catholic institutions are our partners of preference in our work. To reach all those who need our help, we also participate in humanitarian initiatives undertaken by a wide range of groups, such as governments, other faith communities and secular institutions. Although some positions and practices of these institutions are not always consistent with the full range of Catholic teaching, CRS’ association with them is always and only focused on activities that are fully consistent with Catholic teaching. Furthermore, CRS neither facilitates, endorses nor enables any violation of those teachings. CRS and its board of bishops and laypersons have a careful review system to ensure fidelity to Catholic moral teaching and to ensure that all funds under CRS’ direct control are used only for purposes complying with that teaching.”
 
What I found interesting is that the new guidelines that the Vatican issued for Catholic charities it says, "From now on, all Caritas Internationalis statements — particularly “any text with doctrinal or moral content or orientations” — and activities will have to be authorized in advance by the Vatican, except in case of “grave humanitarian emergencies.”
“Cor Unum” will also appoint an ecclesiastical assistant tasked with promoting the “Catholic identity” of Caritas Internationalis, and the Vatican’s Secretariat of State will closely supervise the confederation’s contacts with foreign governments.** "**

It was said that that the new rules would not directly affect Catholic Relief Services. ***“But Cardinal Robert Sarah, president of the pontifical council, explained in L’Osservatore Romano, the Vatican’s semiofficial newspaper, that bishops could be “inspired” by the new rules to revise the statutes of national Catholic charities.” ***And CRS has done that. They have incorporated into their mission statement:
“As a part of the Universal Church, Catholic institutions are our partners of preference in our work. To reach all those who need our help, we also participate in humanitarian initiatives undertaken by a wide range of groups, such as governments, other faith communities and secular institutions. Although some positions and practices of these institutions are not always consistent with the full range of Catholic teaching, CRS’ association with them is always and only focused on activities that are fully consistent with Catholic teaching. Furthermore, CRS neither facilitates, endorses nor enables any violation of those teachings. CRS and its board of bishops and laypersons have a careful review system to ensure fidelity to Catholic moral teaching and to ensure that all funds under CRS’ direct control are used only for purposes complying with that teaching.”
shrug

CCHD’s been playing a shell-game with “revisions,” “reviews,” and “guidelines,” for decades, and it hasn’t changed a thing. As long as the wrong personnel are in place, and this recent LSN article sure is a good indication of that, then the problems that have been coming out of late will continue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top