Women participating during the mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yamato
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Y

Yamato

Guest
I have a friend who is a woman who constantly tells me that the Catholic church should not allow women to participate in any form during the church service. She then quotes 1 Corinthians 14: 34-35 “women should keep silent in the churches, for they are not allowed to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. But if they want to learn anything, they should ask their husbands at home. For it is improper for a woman to speak in the church.”

Could I have some help explaining to her what the Catholic Church believes on this? Thanks.
 
First of all is your friend Catholic?

Second, how does she equate the things that women are able to perform at Mass — EM, read the first two readings, cantor or sing in the choir, altar servers, or the occasional usher – with what St. Paul said about a teaching or prophesying role within the Mass?
 
I have a friend who is a woman who constantly tells me that the Catholic church should not allow women to participate in any form during the church service. She then quotes 1 Corinthians 14: 34-35 “women should keep silent in the churches, for they are not allowed to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. But if they want to learn anything, they should ask their husbands at home. For it is improper for a woman to speak in the church.”

Could I have some help explaining to her what the Catholic Church believes on this? Thanks.
I’m assuming here she is not Catholic and is a member of one of the fundamentalist Christian sects that believe women cannot preach because of 1Cor.? Clearly the Church doesn’t believe in such fundamentalist interpretation of the Bible for starters. Any look at the NT shows quite clearly that women were in positions of some authority in the early home churches. It must be remembered as well that Paul was writing to a specific church that was experiencing difficulties, perhaps from Hellenists or new Christians who had been hellenists who found women actively in the service just too strange for them. Paul may well have been giving a practical solution to the problem until the church was more firmly established. I would point out all the places where Jesus upholds women as well as those post resurrection stories in which women figure prominently in the Church to answer her.

Oh, and I would remind her as well that Paul was not writing what he knew was going to be one day called scripture. That would cut to him from time to time perhaps stating things in letters that were practical in nature and not meant to convey any “truth” about the Church.
 
I have a friend who is a woman who constantly tells me that the Catholic church should not allow women to participate in any form during the church service. She then quotes 1 Corinthians 14: 34-35 “women should keep silent in the churches, for they are not allowed to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. But if they want to learn anything, they should ask their husbands at home. For it is improper for a woman to speak in the church.”

Could I have some help explaining to her what the Catholic Church believes on this? Thanks.
Tell your friend she does not get to make the rules. And, ask HER if she is violating Paul’s words with HER OWN advice to Catholics?!?

Tell her you cant listen to her advice based on her scriptural citation.😛
 
First of all is your friend Catholic?

Second, how does she equate the things that women are able to perform at Mass — EM, read the first two readings, cantor or sing in the choir, altar servers, or the occasional usher – with what St. Paul said about a teaching or prophesying role within the Mass?
She is not Catholic and is part of a fundamentalist church. She believes that this scriptural reading is meant for everything. Singing, leading the choir, altar serving…everything. She believes that a woman should remain silent at all times and not participate during the service. I believe that she thinks it is not simply about teaching or preaching during the service but about everything. I am not sure how she believes that though…
 
She is not Catholic and is part of a fundamentalist church. She believes that this scriptural reading is meant for everything. Singing, leading the choir, altar serving…everything. She believes that a woman should remain silent at all times and not participate during the service. I believe that she thinks it is not simply about teaching or preaching during the service but about everything. I am not sure how she believes that though…
Thank her for her advice, and remind her that only the Pope gets to determine these things. When she starts spluttering about the papacy, remind her that you, as a Catholic, are obedient to him, not her. And remind her that she is happy in her church, as you are in yours, and you aren’t telling her how her church should run things.
 
She is not Catholic and is part of a fundamentalist church. She believes that this scriptural reading is meant for everything. Singing, leading the choir, altar serving…everything. She believes that a woman should remain silent at all times and not participate during the service. I believe that she thinks it is not simply about teaching or preaching during the service but about everything. I am not sure how she believes that though…
Assuming you wish to continue the friendship, I’d just smile and tell her that of course she is not required to believe what she doesnt wish to, as are you…and let it go. Fundamentalists are almost never amenable to changing their views, their entire faith is based on believing a very set list. If anything fails the entire faith fails. I have a very good friend who is fundamentalist in orientation. We agreed long ago not to discuss religion.
 
Thank her for her advice, and remind her that only the Pope gets to determine these things. When she starts spluttering about the papacy, remind her that you, as a Catholic, are obedient to him, not her. And remind her that she is happy in her church, as you are in yours, and you aren’t telling her how her church should run things.
Exellent reply.

However, I am surprised this is the only thing a fundamentalist would find fault with, as you say the Papacy is likely next, but lets face it- Mary, the communion of saints, Purgatory, there are a host of other things that would be objectionable to such a person, and I dont think she will stop at this smaller issue.

Maybe the OP can invite her to a Mass so she can see firsthand we are not as scary as she has been led to believe.
 
Well getting into a “Scripture Battle” is never a good idea, especiallly with fundamentalists who often have, um, interesting views of what the fundamental meaning of a passage is. But if you want, you can ask her what she thinks Paul meant in Galatians 4:27-29. Here is the King James version:
  1. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
  2. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
  3. And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.
Of course she will have half a dozen Paul cites to counter this with, so in the end, Spiritmeadow is probably right. You can agree to love and serve the Lord, and disagree about the best way to do so.
 
I do have to say that at least she is the most intellectually honest fundamentalist I’ve heard about.

Generally, the stick to the "Sola Scriptura’ model, that there is no higher authority than the Bible. Therefore, no earthly authority can legitimately claim that women ARE allowed to preach ( ala Joyce Meyer)

If fundamentalists really did hold to that, there women really would be silent in church and they would all wear headcoverings when they prayed.

We Catholics have an Authentic Magesterium who can rule on exactly what Scriputure means, but they do not.
 
Yamato… Where are you from? That makes a big difference in how to reply. I personally don’t think women should serve on the altar but I accept that we are allowed to by the Church. I don’t stop my dd from altar serving, but it would be a really cold day before I would act as a lector or EMHC. Many of my female friends do though… to each his own.

Also, you may want to remind your friend that she needs to look at historical significance too… there were lots of rules about what women could or couldn’t do at that time. The laws of purity kept women out of the temples for about half of their adult lives anyway. But lets think about it… lack of sanitation, lack of medical knowledge, Mediterranean climate… it was kind of necessary to preserve life to have such rules. We take so much for granted today. Sanitation was a huge problem… remember leprosy? Men had alot of limitations on them too in this regard… but not as many as women just because of the anatomy.
 
Greeting Blessed One - just curious, if you believe the prohibitions go back to the purity laws, sanitation, etc., why do you hold to them today?
 
Greeting Blessed One - just curious, if you believe the prohibitions go back to the purity laws, sanitation, etc., why do you hold to them today?
That is not my reason for not believing that women should serve on the altar… My reason is that the altar is reserved for the vocation of the priesthood. Therefore only men should serve as they are the only ones that may be priests. When women serve on the altar, they are in my opinion, taking that away from a man.

Before anyone jumps on me… I have already stated in my previous post that I accept the magesterium teaching that allows women to be altar servers, EMHC’s and lectors… it just isn’t for me.
 
I have a friend who is a woman who constantly tells me that the Catholic church should not allow women to participate in any form during the church service. She then quotes 1 Corinthians 14: 34-35 “women should keep silent in the churches, for they are not allowed to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. But if they want to learn anything, they should ask their husbands at home. For it is improper for a woman to speak in the church.”

Could I have some help explaining to her what the Catholic Church believes on this? Thanks.
Well, the first thing we believe is that Paul was a very important figure in the early Church, but not Jesus. So while Paul’s insights can be important, not every utterance is the literal word of God.

Second, we believe that it is dangerous to take sections of Holy Scripture out of context. Remember, the passages were written millenia ago in the context of cultures we would barely understand. This is why we consider our Magesterium, the teaching authority of the Church, to be so important. It lets us seperate historical baggage from Christ’s message.

1 Corinthians, which you can find with footnotes from the USCCB here:

usccb.org/nab/bible/1corinthians/1corinthians1.htm

Is actually a good example of these principles. First, as noted above, Paul was writing to Christians who were fractioning and were having not just problems of immodest attire by women (at least by Greek norms at the time), but also engaging in behaviors that Paul notes even pagans would not tolerate. So Paul is essentially picking sides in a local matter.

Second, Paul is defending his legitimacy as an apostle. As the footnotes above mention, there were aparently some charges of not ‘living as he preached’, in numerous ways, including his sexual conduct.

Sexual conduct, BTW, is one area where Paul was at seeming odds with most of the other early Christian leaders. As he notes in 1 Cor., Paul seemed to believe that the new world was imminent. So solo abstinance was the preferred lifestyle for a Christian. Marriage was only for the weak and lustful. This is reiterated in 1 Cor. in chapter 9. Any entanglement, including marriage, is an “obstacle to the Gospel of Christ”.

Had we followed Paul in this regard, we would presumably be extinct today.

Last, you might want to look at the footnotes to chapter 11. Paul viewed his legitimacy as an apostle of extreme importance because he also invisioned a strong heirarchal Church. Paul was likely using the roles of the sexes at the time at least in part to teach proper submission to a Church structure and to God.

You could, of course, ask your friend why so many in her faith abandon Paul and choose the lower, lustful state of marriage. I also always consider asking fundementalists why they defy the Bible and wear mixed blend clothing. But such confrontation is seldom fruitful, and often ends up being very un-neighborly, at least in the spirit of Christ’s teachings.

What you appear to be doing here, a personal challenge to dig deeper into your own faith, is probably the most constructive resposne.

Peace.
 
That is not my reason for not believing that women should serve on the altar… My reason is that the altar is reserved for the vocation of the priesthood. Therefore only men should serve as they are the only ones that may be priests. When women serve on the altar, they are in my opinion, taking that away from a man.

Before anyone jumps on me… I have already stated in my previous post that I accept the magesterium teaching that allows women to be altar servers, EMHC’s and lectors… it just isn’t for me.
you are to be commended for your honesty. I find it interesting that when issues such as this come up (they do come up among some very extreme fundamentalists sects as well who prohibit women from preaching), the persons who are most in favor of not letting women participate are women. Perhaps men feel they will be labeled for speaking so, I don’t know. But its a phenomenon I’ve witnessed about 3 times now.

It is most important that we all recognize what we feel suited for and what we do not. As Paul states, not all are given the same gifts.
Blessings.
 
you are to be commended for your honesty. I find it interesting that when issues such as this come up (they do come up among some very extreme fundamentalists sects as well who prohibit women from preaching), the persons who are most in favor of not letting women participate are women. Perhaps men feel they will be labeled for speaking so, I don’t know. But its a phenomenon I’ve witnessed about 3 times now.

It is most important that we all recognize what we feel suited for and what we do not. As Paul states, not all are given the same gifts.
Blessings.
That’s for sure. Joyce Meyer made 95 million last year according to a poster here. I think I wanna be a female preacher now too.
 
I guess we’d have to give up going to Mass altogether then because just by attending, we participate. All of the faithful who attend Mass, assist at Mass. We do not just sit there and are ministered to. We participate, we worship whether we are a Priest, a Reader, an EMHC or just an ordinary layperson in the pew.
 
That’s for sure. Joyce Meyer made 95 million last year according to a poster here. I think I wanna be a female preacher now too.
Wait a minute… she made that much??? hmmmm… eternal soul…millions…nope… I still don’t wanna, although I think I will apply for the position of personal assistant…surely she spreads the wealth???
 
Tell your friend that by her own interpretation, she has absolutely no authority to teach you. She should be “biblical” and stay quiet.
 
I have a friend who is a woman who constantly tells me that the Catholic church should not allow women to participate in any form during the church service. She then quotes 1 Corinthians 14: 34-35 “women should keep silent in the churches, for they are not allowed to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. But if they want to learn anything, they should ask their husbands at home. For it is improper for a woman to speak in the church.”

Could I have some help explaining to her what the Catholic Church believes on this? Thanks.
Hey, son! 👍 Remind her that Paul was writing specifically to address a particular problem in the church at Corinth. The Greeks were known for, let’s just say, some unusual practices from their pagan days. Some of that societal influence apparently crept into the early church there, necessitating an Apostolic tune up.

Also remind her that Paul mentioned it only in the first letter to the Corinthians. That particular concern is not in Romans, Galatians, Ephesians, etc. If it was meant to be a universal rule, it certainly would have been included in those letters as well. With all of these great responses, see why I spend so much time here?

Christ’s peace be always with you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top